• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非转移性前列腺癌诊断时的个体预后:PREDICT Prostate 多变量模型的建立和外部验证。

Individual prognosis at diagnosis in nonmetastatic prostate cancer: Development and external validation of the PREDICT Prostate multivariable model.

机构信息

Academic Urology Group, Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Department of Urology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS Med. 2019 Mar 12;16(3):e1002758. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002758. eCollection 2019 Mar.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002758
PMID:30860997
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6413892/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prognostic stratification is the cornerstone of management in nonmetastatic prostate cancer (PCa). However, existing prognostic models are inadequate-often using treatment outcomes rather than survival, stratifying by broad heterogeneous groups and using heavily treated cohorts. To address this unmet need, we developed an individualised prognostic model that contextualises PCa-specific mortality (PCSM) against other cause mortality, and estimates the impact of treatment on survival.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

Using records from the United Kingdom National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service (NCRAS), data were collated for 10,089 men diagnosed with nonmetastatic PCa between 2000 and 2010 in Eastern England. Median follow-up was 9.8 years with 3,829 deaths (1,202 PCa specific). Totals of 19.8%, 14.1%, 34.6%, and 31.5% of men underwent conservative management, prostatectomy, radiotherapy (RT), and androgen deprivation monotherapy, respectively. A total of 2,546 men diagnosed in Singapore over a similar time period represented an external validation cohort. Data were randomly split 70:30 into model development and validation cohorts. Fifteen-year PCSM and non-PCa mortality (NPCM) were explored using separate multivariable Cox models within a competing risks framework. Fractional polynomials (FPs) were utilised to fit continuous variables and baseline hazards. Model accuracy was assessed by discrimination and calibration using the Harrell C-index and chi-squared goodness of fit, respectively, within both validation cohorts. A multivariable model estimating individualised 10- and 15-year survival outcomes was constructed combining age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), histological grade, biopsy core involvement, stage, and primary treatment, which were each independent prognostic factors for PCSM, and age and comorbidity, which were prognostic for NPCM. The model demonstrated good discrimination, with a C-index of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.82-0.86) and 0.84 (95% CI: 0.80-0.87) for 15-year PCSM in the UK and Singapore validation cohorts, respectively, comparing favourably to international risk-stratification criteria. Discrimination was maintained for overall mortality, with C-index 0.77 (95% CI: 0.75-0.78) and 0.76 (95% CI: 0.73-0.78). The model was well calibrated with no significant difference between predicted and observed PCa-specific (p = 0.19) or overall deaths (p = 0.43) in the UK cohort. Key study limitations were a relatively small external validation cohort, an inability to account for delayed changes to treatment beyond 12 months, and an absence of tumour-stage subclassifications.

CONCLUSIONS

'PREDICT Prostate' is an individualised multivariable PCa prognostic model built from baseline diagnostic information and the first to our knowledge that models potential treatment benefits on overall survival. Prognostic power is high despite using only routinely collected clinicopathological information.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65cc/6413892/0476a251f81a/pmed.1002758.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65cc/6413892/c8a14a0215ee/pmed.1002758.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65cc/6413892/b7a88a30b253/pmed.1002758.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65cc/6413892/0476a251f81a/pmed.1002758.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65cc/6413892/c8a14a0215ee/pmed.1002758.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65cc/6413892/b7a88a30b253/pmed.1002758.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65cc/6413892/0476a251f81a/pmed.1002758.g003.jpg
摘要

背景

预后分层是非转移性前列腺癌(PCa)管理的基石。然而,现有的预后模型并不完善,通常使用治疗结果而不是生存情况进行分层,使用广泛的异质群体进行分层,并使用经过大量治疗的队列。为了解决这一未满足的需求,我们开发了一种个体化的预后模型,该模型将 PCa 特异性死亡率(PCSM)与其他原因死亡率进行对比,并估计治疗对生存的影响。

方法和发现

利用英国国家癌症登记和分析服务(NCRAS)的数据,我们对 2000 年至 2010 年期间在英格兰东部被诊断为非转移性 PCa 的 10089 名男性患者的数据进行了汇总。中位随访时间为 9.8 年,共有 3829 人死亡(1202 人死于 PCa)。分别有 19.8%、14.1%、34.6%和 31.5%的男性接受了保守治疗、前列腺切除术、放疗(RT)和雄激素剥夺单药治疗。新加坡在相似的时间段内诊断出的 2546 名男性代表了一个外部验证队列。数据被随机分为 70:30 的模型开发和验证队列。我们在竞争风险框架内使用单独的多变量 Cox 模型来探索 15 年的 PCSM 和非 PCa 死亡率(NPCM)。使用分数多项式(FP)拟合连续变量和基线风险。我们分别使用 Harrell C 指数和卡方拟合优度检验来评估模型在两个验证队列中的准确性。我们构建了一个多变量模型,该模型通过结合年龄、前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)、组织学分级、活检核心受累、分期和主要治疗来估计个体 10 年和 15 年的生存结果,这些因素都是 PCSM 的独立预后因素,而年龄和合并症是 NPCM 的预后因素。该模型具有良好的判别能力,在英国和新加坡验证队列中,15 年 PCSM 的 C 指数分别为 0.84(95%CI:0.82-0.86)和 0.84(95%CI:0.80-0.87),与国际风险分层标准相比表现良好。对于总死亡率,判别能力也得到了保持,C 指数分别为 0.77(95%CI:0.75-0.78)和 0.76(95%CI:0.73-0.78)。该模型具有良好的校准能力,在英国队列中,预测的 PCa 特异性(p=0.19)或总死亡(p=0.43)与观察结果之间没有显著差异。研究的主要局限性是外部验证队列相对较小,无法考虑 12 个月后治疗的延迟变化,以及缺乏肿瘤分期亚分类。

结论

“PREDICT Prostate”是一种基于基线诊断信息的个体化多变量 PCa 预后模型,是第一个我们所知的能够预测整体生存中潜在治疗益处的模型。尽管只使用了常规收集的临床病理信息,但预后能力仍然很高。

相似文献

1
Individual prognosis at diagnosis in nonmetastatic prostate cancer: Development and external validation of the PREDICT Prostate multivariable model.非转移性前列腺癌诊断时的个体预后:PREDICT Prostate 多变量模型的建立和外部验证。
PLoS Med. 2019 Mar 12;16(3):e1002758. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002758. eCollection 2019 Mar.
2
Improving Clinical Risk Stratification at Diagnosis in Primary Prostate Cancer: A Prognostic Modelling Study.改善原发性前列腺癌诊断时的临床风险分层:一项预后建模研究。
PLoS Med. 2016 Aug 2;13(8):e1002063. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002063. eCollection 2016 Aug.
3
Comparative performance and external validation of the multivariable PREDICT Prostate tool for non-metastatic prostate cancer: a study in 69,206 men from Prostate Cancer data Base Sweden (PCBaSe).多变量 PREDICT Prostate 工具在非转移性前列腺癌中的比较性能和外部验证:来自前列腺癌数据库瑞典(PCBaSe)的 69206 名男性的研究。
BMC Med. 2020 Jun 16;18(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01606-w.
4
Development and Validation of a Clinical Prognostic Stage Group System for Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer Using Disease-Specific Mortality Results From the International Staging Collaboration for Cancer of the Prostate.国际前列腺癌分期协作组基于疾病特异性死亡率数据制定和验证非转移性前列腺癌临床预后分期系统。
JAMA Oncol. 2020 Dec 1;6(12):1912-1920. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.4922.
5
6
Long-term Prostate Cancer-specific Mortality After Prostatectomy, Brachytherapy, External Beam Radiation Therapy, Hormonal Therapy, or Monitoring for Localized Prostate Cancer.前列腺癌根治术后、近距离放射治疗、外照射治疗、激素治疗或局部前列腺癌监测后的长期前列腺癌特异性死亡率。
Eur Urol. 2024 Jun;85(6):565-573. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.09.024. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
7
Radical prostatectomy in Denmark: Survival analysis and temporal trends in clinicopathological parameters with up to 20 years of follow-up.丹麦的根治性前列腺切除术:长达20年随访的生存分析及临床病理参数的时间趋势
Surg Oncol. 2017 Mar;26(1):21-27. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2016.12.002. Epub 2016 Dec 8.
8
Nomogram Predicting Prostate Cancer-specific Mortality for Men with Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy.预测前列腺癌根治术后生化复发男性前列腺癌特异性死亡率的列线图
Eur Urol. 2015 Jun;67(6):1160-1167. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.09.019. Epub 2014 Oct 6.
9
The Cambridge Prognostic Groups for improved prediction of disease mortality at diagnosis in primary non-metastatic prostate cancer: a validation study.剑桥预后分组可改善原发性非转移性前列腺癌诊断时疾病死亡率的预测:验证性研究。
BMC Med. 2018 Feb 28;16(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12916-018-1019-5.
10
Ability of a Genomic Classifier to Predict Metastasis and Prostate Cancer-specific Mortality after Radiation or Surgery based on Needle Biopsy Specimens.基于针吸活检标本的基因组分类器预测放射或手术后转移和前列腺癌特异性死亡率的能力。
Eur Urol. 2017 Nov;72(5):845-852. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.05.009. Epub 2017 May 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Adaption of the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Nomograms for the Prediction of Prostate Cancer-specific Death in Sweden: A Population-based Cohort Study.纪念斯隆凯特琳癌症中心列线图在瑞典预测前列腺癌特异性死亡中的应用:一项基于人群的队列研究
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2025 Jul 14;78:41-50. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2025.06.003. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
The natural history of prostate cancer.前列腺癌的自然病史。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2025 Aug;19(8):275-281. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.9117.
3
Survival After Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer: Development of a Fair Machine Learning Model.

本文引用的文献

1
Survivorship, Version 2.2018, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.生存状况,第 2.2018 版,NCCN 肿瘤学临床实践指南。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2018 Oct;16(10):1216-1247. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2018.0078.
2
MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis.MRI 靶向或标准活检用于前列腺癌诊断。
N Engl J Med. 2018 May 10;378(19):1767-1777. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1801993. Epub 2018 Mar 18.
3
The Cambridge Prognostic Groups for improved prediction of disease mortality at diagnosis in primary non-metastatic prostate cancer: a validation study.
膀胱癌根治性膀胱切除术后的生存情况:一种合理的机器学习模型的开发
JMIR Med Inform. 2024 Dec 13;12:e63289. doi: 10.2196/63289.
4
Prostate cancer genotyping for risk stratification and precision treatment.用于风险分层和精准治疗的前列腺癌基因分型
Curr Urol. 2024 Jun;18(2):87-97. doi: 10.1097/CU9.0000000000000222. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
5
Utilisation and impact of predict prostate on decision-making among clinicians and patients in a specialist tertiary referral centre: A retrospective cohort study.预测前列腺指标在专科三级转诊中心临床医生和患者决策中的应用及影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
BJUI Compass. 2023 Nov 20;5(4):489-496. doi: 10.1002/bco2.311. eCollection 2024 Apr.
6
What Affects Perceived Trustworthiness of Online Medical Information and Subsequent Treatment Decision Making? Randomized Trials on the Role of Uncertainty and Institutional Cues.什么影响在线医疗信息的感知可信度及后续治疗决策?关于不确定性和机构线索作用的随机试验。
MDM Policy Pract. 2024 Feb 15;9(1):23814683241226660. doi: 10.1177/23814683241226660. eCollection 2024 Jan-Jun.
7
Cohort profile: the Turin prostate cancer prognostication (TPCP) cohort.队列简介:都灵前列腺癌预后(TPCP)队列。
Front Oncol. 2023 Oct 6;13:1242639. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1242639. eCollection 2023.
8
Artificial intelligence in theranostics of gastric cancer, a review.人工智能在胃癌诊疗一体化中的应用综述
Med Rev (2021). 2023 Jul 27;3(3):214-229. doi: 10.1515/mr-2022-0042. eCollection 2023 Jun.
9
Using temporal recalibration to improve the calibration of risk prediction models in competing risk settings when there are trends in survival over time.利用时变校准来改进风险预测模型在竞争风险环境中的校准,当存在随时间变化的生存趋势时。
Stat Med. 2023 Nov 30;42(27):5007-5024. doi: 10.1002/sim.9898. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
10
Artificial intelligence applications in pediatric oncology diagnosis.人工智能在儿科肿瘤诊断中的应用。
Explor Target Antitumor Ther. 2023;4(1):157-169. doi: 10.37349/etat.2023.00127. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
剑桥预后分组可改善原发性非转移性前列腺癌诊断时疾病死亡率的预测:验证性研究。
BMC Med. 2018 Feb 28;16(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12916-018-1019-5.
4
Development and External Validation of Prediction Models for 10-Year Survival of Invasive Breast Cancer. Comparison with PREDICT and CancerMath.发展和验证预测浸润性乳腺癌 10 年生存率的模型,并与 PREDICT 和 CancerMath 进行比较。
Clin Cancer Res. 2018 May 1;24(9):2110-2115. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-3542. Epub 2018 Feb 14.
5
Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO Guideline. Part I: Risk Stratification, Shared Decision Making, and Care Options.临床局限性前列腺癌:AUA/ASTRO/SUO 指南。第 I 部分:风险分层、共同决策和治疗选择。
J Urol. 2018 Mar;199(3):683-690. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.11.095. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
6
Genomic Markers in Prostate Cancer Decision Making.前列腺癌决策中的基因组标志物。
Eur Urol. 2018 Apr;73(4):572-582. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.10.036. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
7
Whom to Treat: Postdiagnostic Risk Assessment with Gleason Score, Risk Models, and Genomic Classifier.治疗对象:基于Gleason评分、风险模型和基因组分类器的诊断后风险评估
Urol Clin North Am. 2017 Nov;44(4):547-555. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2017.07.003.
8
Prolaris Cell Cycle Progression Test for Localized Prostate Cancer: A Health Technology Assessment.局限性前列腺癌的Prolaris细胞周期进展检测:一项卫生技术评估
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2017 May 1;17(6):1-75. eCollection 2017.
9
An updated PREDICT breast cancer prognostication and treatment benefit prediction model with independent validation.一种经过更新且具有独立验证的PREDICT乳腺癌预后及治疗获益预测模型。
Breast Cancer Res. 2017 May 22;19(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s13058-017-0852-3.
10
Treatment Decision Regret Among Long-Term Survivors of Localized Prostate Cancer: Results From the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study.局限性前列腺癌长期幸存者的治疗决策遗憾:前列腺癌结局研究结果
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jul 10;35(20):2306-2314. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.70.6317. Epub 2017 May 11.