Department of Culture, Media and Creative Industries, King's College.
Department of Sociology, London School of Economics.
Br J Sociol. 2019 Dec;70(5):2020-2041. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12657. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
Lighting is increasingly recognized as a significant social intervention by both lighting professionals and academic social scientists. However, what counts as 'the social' is diverse and contested, with consequences for what kind of 'social' is performed or invented. Based on a long-term research programme, we argue that collaboration between sociologists and lighting professionals requires negotiating discourses and practices of 'the social'. This paper explores the quality and kinds of spaces made for 'the social' in professional practices and academic collaborations, focusing on two case studies of urban lighting that demonstrate how the space of 'the social' is constrained and impoverished by an institutionalized division between technical and aesthetic lighting. We consider the potential role of sociologists in making more productive spaces for 'the social' in urban design, as part of the central sociological task of 'inventing the social' (Marres, Guggenheim and Wilkie 2018) in the process of studying it.
照明越来越被照明专业人员和学术社会科学家视为一种重要的社会干预手段。然而,什么是“社会”是多种多样的,存在争议的,这对什么样的“社会”能够发挥作用或被发明具有影响。基于一个长期的研究计划,我们认为,社会学家和照明专业人员之间的合作需要协商“社会”的话语和实践。本文探讨了在专业实践和学术合作中为“社会”创造的空间的质量和种类,重点关注两个城市照明的案例研究,这些案例研究表明,“社会”空间是如何受到技术和美学照明之间制度化分工的限制和贫困化的。我们考虑了社会学家在城市设计中为“社会”创造更富有成效的空间的潜在作用,这是社会学家在研究过程中“发明社会”(Marres、Guggenheim 和 Wilkie 2018)这一核心社会学任务的一部分。