Calandra T, Glauser M P
Am J Med. 1986 May 30;80(5C):45-52.
Studies of various models of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in neutropenic animals have demonstrated the superiority of the combination of beta-lactam and aminoglycoside antibiotics when compared with a single drug alone. A limited number of studies carried out in models of Klebsiella pneumoniae infections in neutropenic animals have shown similar results. The efficacy of double beta-lactam combinations for the treatment of gram-negative bacillary infections has not been studied as extensively; the few available reports did not show any benefit over a single beta-lactam treatment. Most studies of combined therapy in gram-positive infections have been performed in the experimental endocarditis model. Experiments in Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus viridans, and Streptococcus faecalis endocarditis have shown a clear-cut advantage for combined beta-lactam/aminoglycoside treatment over single beta-lactam therapy, as predicted by in vitro tests. The enhanced efficacy of combined beta-lactam/aminoglycoside treatment in both gram-negative bacillary and gram-positive coccal infections appears to result in most studies in increased and faster killing of the bacteria. With P. aeruginosa infections, however, experiments in neutropenic mice suggest that in addition to increased killing, the beta-lactam arm of the combined treatment prevents the emergence of the small colony variants that lead to treatment failures during therapy with aminoglycoside alone. For both gram-negative bacillary and gram-positive coccal infections, in vitro tests that demonstrated synergism for the combined antibiotics generally predicted enhanced therapeutic efficacy in vivo. Conversely, when no synergism was demonstrated in vitro, there was generally no increased efficacy of combined treatment in vivo. Animal models add a dimension to our understanding of the efficacy of antibiotics, both singly and in combination, that is not always apparent from the results of in vitro tests alone. These in vivo tests can be of value when planning clinical trials.
对中性粒细胞减少动物的各种铜绿假单胞菌感染模型的研究表明,与单一药物相比,β-内酰胺类抗生素和氨基糖苷类抗生素联合使用具有优越性。在中性粒细胞减少动物的肺炎克雷伯菌感染模型中进行的有限数量的研究也显示了类似的结果。双β-内酰胺联合用药治疗革兰氏阴性杆菌感染的疗效尚未得到广泛研究;现有的少数报告未显示出比单一β-内酰胺治疗有任何优势。大多数革兰氏阳性菌感染联合治疗的研究是在实验性心内膜炎模型中进行的。对金黄色葡萄球菌、草绿色链球菌和粪肠球菌心内膜炎的实验表明,正如体外试验所预测的那样,联合β-内酰胺/氨基糖苷治疗比单一β-内酰胺治疗具有明显优势。在大多数研究中,联合β-内酰胺/氨基糖苷治疗在革兰氏阴性杆菌和革兰氏阳性球菌感染中的疗效增强似乎导致细菌的杀灭增加且更快。然而,对于铜绿假单胞菌感染,中性粒细胞减少小鼠的实验表明,除了杀灭增加外,联合治疗中的β-内酰胺部分还可防止小菌落变异体的出现,而这些变异体会导致单独使用氨基糖苷治疗期间出现治疗失败。对于革兰氏阴性杆菌和革兰氏阳性球菌感染,证明联合抗生素具有协同作用的体外试验通常可预测体内治疗效果增强。相反,当体外未显示协同作用时,联合治疗在体内通常没有疗效增加。动物模型为我们理解抗生素单独和联合使用的疗效增加了一个维度,这并不总是仅从体外试验结果中就能明显看出的。这些体内试验在规划临床试验时可能有价值。