• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国家产科质量改进小组的建议

Recommendations From a National Panel on Quality Improvement in Obstetrics.

作者信息

Lefebvre Guylaine, Calder Lisa A, De Gorter Ria, Bowman Cara L, Bell Douglas, Bow Michael

机构信息

The Canadian Medical Protective Association, Ottawa, ON.

The Canadian Medical Protective Association, Ottawa, ON; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON.

出版信息

J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019 May;41(5):653-659. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2019.02.011. Epub 2019 Mar 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.jogc.2019.02.011
PMID:30871815
Abstract

This paper describes the recommendations of a national panel on quality improvement in obstetrics to identify priorities for action among five areas of greatest medico-legal risk. Using previously conducted medico-legal data analyses and a systematic literature review, the panel reviewed existing data and developed recommendations for areas of focus in quality improvement in five obstetrical high-risk areas. The panel recommended clarification of definitions in some areas, identified needs for data collection and standardization of practices in others. The most promising interventions to improve care in the five areas were grouped into: standardized processes (such as protocols and communication tools), checklists, audit and feedback, mentoring and coaching, inter-professional communication, simulation and training, and shared decision making guides. This national panel of experts created 18 action-oriented recommendations focused on quality improvement to reduce medico-legal risk and improve the safety of care for Canadian mothers and babies.

摘要

本文介绍了一个全国产科质量改进小组的建议,以确定五个最大医疗法律风险领域中的行动重点。该小组利用先前进行的医疗法律数据分析和系统的文献综述,审查了现有数据,并针对五个产科高风险领域的质量改进重点领域制定了建议。该小组建议在某些领域澄清定义,在其他领域确定数据收集需求和实践标准化需求。在这五个领域改善护理的最有前景的干预措施分为:标准化流程(如方案和沟通工具)、检查表、审核与反馈、指导与辅导、跨专业沟通、模拟与培训以及共同决策指南。这个全国专家小组提出了18项以行动为导向的建议,重点是质量改进,以降低医疗法律风险,提高加拿大母婴护理的安全性。

相似文献

1
Recommendations From a National Panel on Quality Improvement in Obstetrics.国家产科质量改进小组的建议
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019 May;41(5):653-659. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2019.02.011. Epub 2019 Mar 11.
2
Obstetric Safety and Quality.产科安全与质量
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jul;126(1):196-206. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000918.
3
Improving the quality of obstetric care for women with obstructed labour in the national referral hospital in Uganda: lessons learnt from criteria based audit.提高乌干达国家转诊医院中梗阻性分娩妇女的产科护理质量:基于标准审核的经验教训
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Jul 11;16(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-0949-1.
4
Vaginal delivery of breech presentation.臀位的阴道分娩
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2009 Jun;31(6):557-566. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34221-9.
5
Improved obstetric safety through programmatic collaboration.通过项目协作提高产科安全性。
J Healthc Risk Manag. 2014;33(3):14-22. doi: 10.1002/jhrm.21131.
6
Implementing Obstetrics Quality Improvement, Driven by Medico-legal Risk, is Associated With Improved Workplace Culture.医疗法制风险驱动的产科质量改进与改善工作场所文化相关联。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2020 Jan;42(1):38-47.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2019.05.011. Epub 2019 Aug 13.
7
No. 367-2019 Canadian Guideline for Physical Activity throughout Pregnancy.第367 - 2019号《加拿大孕期体育活动指南》
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2018 Nov;40(11):1528-1537. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2018.07.001. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
8
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 526: Standardization of practice to improve outcomes.美国妇产科医师学会委员会意见 No.526:规范实践以改善结局。
Obstet Gynecol. 2012 May;119(5):1081-2. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31825649ad.
9
Safe deliveries.安全分娩
Hosp Health Netw. 2004 Nov;78(11):56-8, 60, 1.
10
Quality Improvement and Patient Safety on Labor and Delivery.分娩过程中的质量改进和患者安全。
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2017 Dec;44(4):667-678. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2017.08.002.

引用本文的文献

1
"Nothing Comes to Mind…": Challenges With Identifying One's Own Role in Preventable Adverse Outcomes in Interprofessional Birthing Unit Teams, and the Implications for Quality Improvement Initiatives.“毫无头绪……”:跨专业分娩单元团队中确定自身在可预防不良结局中的角色面临的挑战及其对质量改进举措的影响
Perspect Med Educ. 2025 May 7;14(1):243-254. doi: 10.5334/pme.1651. eCollection 2025.
2
Addressing obstetric violence: a scoping review of interventions in healthcare and their impact on maternal care quality.解决产科暴力问题:医疗保健干预措施及其对母婴护理质量影响的范围综述。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jun 24;12:1388858. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1388858. eCollection 2024.
3
Impact of an intrapartum care quality improvement intervention in Brazilian private hospitals on care safety measures and adverse outcomes.
巴西私立医院产时护理质量改进干预对护理安全措施和不良结局的影响。
Reprod Health. 2023 Feb 2;20(Suppl 2):27. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01541-4.
4
Obstetric Violence in Spain (Part III): Healthcare Professionals, Times, and Areas.西班牙的产科暴力(第三部分):医疗保健专业人员、时间和地点。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 24;18(7):3359. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073359.