Suppr超能文献

理解情感性疾病风险中的情绪僵化:整合当前研究并探寻前进之路

Understanding Emotion Inflexibility in Risk for Affective Disease: Integrating Current Research and Finding a Path Forward.

作者信息

Coifman Karin G, Summers Christopher B

机构信息

Kent State University, Kent, OH, United States.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 27;10:392. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00392. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

Emotion-related disorders (e.g., depression, anxiety, stress, eating, substance and some personality disorders) include some of the most common, burdensome, and costly diseases worldwide. Central to many, if not all of these disorders, may be patterns of rigid or inflexible emotion responses. Indeed, theorists point to emotion in-flexibility as a potential cause or maintaining factor in emotion-related diseases. Despite the increasing prominence of emotion inflexibility in theories of affective disease, a comprehensive review of the developing empirical literature has not yet been conducted. Accordingly, this review will examine the three dominant lines of inquiry assessing emotion flexibility. These include: (1) the capacity to use and vary deliberate emotion regulation strategies, (2) the context sensitivity of spontaneous emotional responses, and (3) flexibility in the appraisal of emotional events and experiences. Moreover, current evidence suggests that each of these three lines of research may converge to suggest the interplay of two key biological dimensions in emotion inflexibility, threat sensitivity, and cognitive control, known to be impaired in patients with affective disorders. In short, this developing body of work suggests a path by which future research could explicate and even exploit the ties between emotion inflexibility and affective disease, contributing to the development of improved models of risk, assessment, and intervention, with broad implications for psychological health.

摘要

与情绪相关的障碍(如抑郁症、焦虑症、压力、饮食、物质使用及某些人格障碍)包括全球范围内一些最常见、最具负担且成本最高的疾病。许多(即便不是所有)这些障碍的核心可能是僵化或不灵活的情绪反应模式。事实上,理论家们指出情绪不灵活性是与情绪相关疾病的潜在病因或维持因素。尽管情绪不灵活性在情感疾病理论中日益突出,但尚未对不断发展的实证文献进行全面综述。因此,本综述将考察评估情绪灵活性的三条主要研究线索。这些包括:(1)运用和改变有意情绪调节策略的能力,(2)自发情绪反应的情境敏感性,以及(3)对情绪事件和经历评估的灵活性。此外,目前的证据表明,这三条研究线索中的每一条可能都趋于表明,在情绪不灵活性中两个关键生物学维度——威胁敏感性和认知控制——之间存在相互作用,而这两个维度在情感障碍患者中已知受损。简而言之,这一不断发展的研究成果为未来研究指明了一条路径,通过这条路径,未来研究可以阐明甚至利用情绪不灵活性与情感疾病之间的联系,为改进风险、评估和干预模型的发展做出贡献,对心理健康具有广泛影响。

相似文献

4
Cognitive deficits in bipolar disorders: Implications for emotion.双相情感障碍中的认知缺陷:对情绪的影响。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2018 Feb;59:126-136. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2017.11.006. Epub 2017 Nov 21.

引用本文的文献

9
The role of affective urgency and emotion regulation in vaping susceptibility.情感紧迫性和情绪调节在电子烟易感性中的作用。
Addict Behav Rep. 2021 May 27;14:100355. doi: 10.1016/j.abrep.2021.100355. eCollection 2021 Dec.
10
A continuum hypothesis of psychotomimetic rapid antidepressants.拟精神病性快速抗抑郁药的连续体假说。
Brain Neurosci Adv. 2021 May 3;5:23982128211007772. doi: 10.1177/23982128211007772. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.

本文引用的文献

4
Rumination and eating disorder psychopathology: A meta-analysis.反刍与进食障碍心理病理学:一项荟萃分析。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2018 Apr;61:9-23. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2018.03.004. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
6
The bipolarity of affect and depressive symptoms.情感的两极性与抑郁症状。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2018 Feb;114(2):323-341. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000186.
8
Neurocognitive assessment of emotional context sensitivity.情绪情境敏感性的神经认知评估。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2017 Oct;17(5):1058-1071. doi: 10.3758/s13415-017-0533-9.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验