Suppr超能文献

风湿性疾病患者破伤风/白喉疫苗接种的安全性和免疫原性:一项前瞻性多中心队列研究。

Safety and immunogenicity of tetanus/diphtheria vaccination in patients with rheumatic diseases-a prospective multi-centre cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Public Health/Division of Infectious Diseases, Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Department of Tropical Medicine, Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine & I. Department of Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Rheumatology (Oxford). 2019 Sep 1;58(9):1585-1596. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez045.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to assess the safety and immunogenicity of a diphtheria/tetanus vaccine booster dose in three different patient groups with rheumatic diseases on a variety of immunosuppressive/immunomodulatory medications compared with healthy controls (HCs).

METHODS

We conducted a multi-centre prospective cohort study in Switzerland. We enrolled patients with RA, axial SpA/PsA, vasculitis (Behçet's disease, ANCA-associated vasculitis) and HCs. Diphtheria/tetanus vaccination was administered according to the Swiss vaccination recommendations. Blood samples were drawn before vaccination, and 1 month and 3 months afterwards. Antibody concentrations against vaccine antigens were measured by ELISA. Immunogenicity was compared between patient and medication groups. A mixed model was applied for multivariate analysis. Missing data were dealt with using multiple imputation.

RESULTS

Between January 2014 and December 2015, we enrolled 284 patients with rheumatic diseases (131 RA, 114 SpA/PsA, 39 vasculitis) and 253 HCs. Of the patients, 89% were on immunosuppressive/immunomodulatory medication. Three months post-vaccination 100% of HCs vs 98% of patients were protected against tetanus and 84% vs 73% against diphtheria. HCs and SpA/PsA patients had significantly higher responses than RA and vasculitis patients. Assessing underlying diseases and medications in a multivariate model, rituximab was the only factor negatively influencing tetanus immunogenicity, whereas only MTX treatment had a negative influence on diphtheria antibody responses. No vaccine-related serious adverse events were recorded.

CONCLUSION

Diphtheria/tetanus booster vaccination was safe. Tetanus vaccination was immunogenic; the diphtheria component was less immunogenic. Vaccine responses were blunted by rituximab and MTX.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, http://clinicaltrials.gov, Identifier: NCT01947465.

摘要

目的

我们旨在评估在瑞士进行的一项多中心前瞻性队列研究中,与健康对照(HCs)相比,三组不同的风湿性疾病患者(类风湿关节炎、中轴型脊柱关节炎/银屑病关节炎、血管炎[贝赫切特病、抗中性粒细胞胞浆抗体相关性血管炎])接受不同免疫抑制剂/免疫调节剂治疗时,加强型白喉破伤风疫苗的安全性和免疫原性。我们根据瑞士疫苗接种建议对患者进行白喉破伤风疫苗接种。在接种前、接种后 1 个月和 3 个月采集血样,通过 ELISA 检测疫苗抗原的抗体浓度。比较患者和药物组之间的免疫原性。采用混合模型进行多变量分析。对于缺失数据,我们采用多重插补法进行处理。

结果

2014 年 1 月至 2015 年 12 月,我们共招募了 284 例风湿性疾病患者(131 例类风湿关节炎、114 例中轴型脊柱关节炎/银屑病关节炎、39 例血管炎)和 253 例 HCs。其中 89%的患者接受免疫抑制剂/免疫调节剂治疗。接种后 3 个月,100%的 HCs 对破伤风、98%的患者对破伤风具有保护作用,84%的 HCs 对白喉、73%的患者对白喉具有保护作用。HCs 和 SpA/PsA 患者的反应明显高于 RA 和血管炎患者。在多变量模型中评估基础疾病和药物时,利妥昔单抗是唯一对破伤风免疫原性产生负面影响的因素,而只有 MTX 治疗对白喉抗体反应有负面影响。未记录到与疫苗相关的严重不良事件。

结论

白喉破伤风加强疫苗接种安全。破伤风疫苗具有免疫原性;白喉成分的免疫原性较低。利妥昔单抗和 MTX 会削弱疫苗的反应。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov,http://clinicaltrials.gov,标识符:NCT01947465。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验