• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Misclassification of Myocardial Injury as Myocardial Infarction: Implications for Assessing Outcomes in Value-Based Programs.将心肌损伤误诊为心肌梗死:对基于价值的项目评估结果的影响。
JAMA Cardiol. 2019 May 1;4(5):460-464. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.0716.
2
Classification Algorithm to Distinguish Between Type 1 and Type 2 Myocardial Infarction in Administrative Claims Data.基于行政索赔数据的 1 型和 2 型心肌梗死鉴别分类算法。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2024 Feb;17(2):e009986. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.123.009986. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
3
Sex-based differences in clinical outcomes and resource utilization of type 2 myocardial infarction.2 型心肌梗死患者的临床结局和资源利用的性别差异。
Int J Cardiol. 2021 Sep 1;338:24-29. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.05.043. Epub 2021 May 29.
4
Use of objective evidence of myocardial ischemia to facilitate the diagnostic and prognostic distinction between type 2 myocardial infarction and myocardial injury.利用心肌缺血的客观证据来促进 2 型心肌梗死和心肌损伤的诊断和预后区分。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2020 Feb;9(1):62-69. doi: 10.1177/2048872618787796. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
5
Incidence, Trends, and Outcomes of Type 2 Myocardial Infarction in a Community Cohort.2 型心肌梗死在社区队列中的发病率、趋势和结局。
Circulation. 2020 Feb 11;141(6):454-463. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.043100. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
6
Wake Forest University long-term follow-up of type 2 myocardial infarction: The Wake-Up T2MI Registry.维克森林大学 2 型心肌梗死的长期随访:维克森林 T2MI 注册研究。
Clin Cardiol. 2019 Jun;42(6):592-604. doi: 10.1002/clc.23182. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
7
Type 2 Myocardial Infarction in a Sub-Saharan Africa Population: Challenging the Current Concepts-Data From REACTIV.撒哈拉以南非洲人群中的 2 型心肌梗死:挑战现有概念——REACTIV 研究的数据
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Jul 16;13(14):e032149. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.032149. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
8
Type 2 myocardial infarction: incidence, presentation, treatment and outcome in routine clinical practice.2型心肌梗死:常规临床实践中的发病率、临床表现、治疗及预后
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2017 May;18(5):341-347. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000000504.
9
Characteristics and occurrence of type 2 myocardial infarction in emergency department patients: a prospective study.急诊科患者 2 型心肌梗死的特征和发生情况:一项前瞻性研究。
Emerg Med J. 2018 Mar;35(3):169-175. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2017-206869. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
10
Discordance between ICD-Coded Myocardial Infarction and Diagnosis according to the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction.国际疾病分类(ICD)编码的心肌梗死与依据心肌梗死通用定义所做诊断之间的不一致性。
Clin Chem. 2017 Jan;63(1):415-419. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2016.263764. Epub 2016 Nov 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Liraglutide Treatment Restores Cardiac Function After Isoprenaline-Induced Myocardial Injury and Prevents Heart Failure in Rats.利拉鲁肽治疗可恢复异丙肾上腺素诱导的心肌损伤后大鼠的心功能并预防心力衰竭。
Life (Basel). 2025 Mar 12;15(3):443. doi: 10.3390/life15030443.
2
Utilization of Cardiovascular Procedures, Consultation Services, and Cardioprotective Medications Among Type 2 Myocardial Infarction Patients.2型心肌梗死患者心血管手术、会诊服务及心脏保护药物的使用情况
JACC Adv. 2025 Mar;4(3):101629. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101629. Epub 2025 Feb 20.
3
Defining myocardial infarction: grades of severity or different aetiology.定义心肌梗死:严重程度分级或不同病因
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2025 Mar 22;14(3):142-144. doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuaf025.
4
Management of Acute Coronary Syndrome in Elderly Patients: A Narrative Review through Decisional Crossroads.老年患者急性冠状动脉综合征的管理:通过决策十字路口的叙述性综述
J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 10;13(20):6034. doi: 10.3390/jcm13206034.
5
Cardiac Troponin Levels in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: "Markers of High Risk or Just Noise''?慢性肾病患者的心肌肌钙蛋白水平:“高风险标志物还是仅仅是干扰因素”?
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Oct 18;14(20):2316. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14202316.
6
Restrictive Versus Liberal Transfusion in Patients With Type 1 or Type 2 Myocardial Infarction: A Prespecified Analysis of the MINT Trial.1型或2型心肌梗死患者的限制性输血与自由输血:MINT试验的预先设定分析
Circulation. 2024 Dec 3;150(23):1826-1836. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.071208. Epub 2024 Aug 29.
7
COVID-19 and myocardial injury: Targeting elevated biomarkers for potential novel therapies.COVID-19 与心肌损伤:针对升高的生物标志物寻找潜在的新型治疗方法。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2024 Aug 27;79:100473. doi: 10.1016/j.clinsp.2024.100473. eCollection 2024.
8
Clinical Characteristics, Outcomes, and Epidemiological Trends of Patients Admitted With Type 2 Myocardial Infarction.2型心肌梗死患者的临床特征、结局及流行病学趋势
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2022 Jun 29;1(5):100395. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100395. eCollection 2022 Sep-Oct.
9
Readmissions for Myocardial Infarction Among Survivors of COVID-19 Hospitalization: Nationwide Analysis From Pandemic Year 2020.新冠病毒肺炎住院幸存者中心肌梗死再入院情况:2020年大流行年的全国性分析
JACC Adv. 2023 Jul 27;2(6):100453. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2023.100453. eCollection 2023 Aug.
10
Application of the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction in Clinical Practice in Scotland and Sweden.苏格兰和瑞典临床实践中应用通用心肌梗死定义。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Apr 1;7(4):e245853. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.5853.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical Profile of Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients Included in the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program.纳入医院再入院减少计划的急性心肌梗死患者的临床特征。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Aug 21;7(16):e009339. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009339.
2
Type 2 Myocardial Infarction and the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program.2型心肌梗死与医院再入院减少计划。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Sep 4;72(10):1166-1170. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.06.055.
3
Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (2018).心肌梗死的第四次全球定义(2018年)。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Oct 30;72(18):2231-2264. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.08.1038. Epub 2018 Aug 25.
4
Trends in 30-Day Readmission Rates for Medicare and Non-Medicare Patients in the Era of the Affordable Care Act.平价医疗法案时代 Medicare 和非 Medicare 患者 30 天再入院率的趋势。
Am J Med. 2018 Nov;131(11):1324-1331.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2018.06.013. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
5
Type 1 and 2 Myocardial Infarction and Myocardial Injury: Clinical Transition to High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I.1型和2型心肌梗死及心肌损伤:向高敏心肌肌钙蛋白I的临床转变
Am J Med. 2017 Dec;130(12):1431-1439.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.05.049. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
6
Predicting In-Hospital Mortality in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction.预测急性心肌梗死患者的住院死亡率。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Aug 9;68(6):626-635. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.05.049.

将心肌损伤误诊为心肌梗死:对基于价值的项目评估结果的影响。

Misclassification of Myocardial Injury as Myocardial Infarction: Implications for Assessing Outcomes in Value-Based Programs.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.

Department of Medicine, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut.

出版信息

JAMA Cardiol. 2019 May 1;4(5):460-464. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.0716.

DOI:10.1001/jamacardio.2019.0716
PMID:30879022
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6537800/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Similar to other patients with acute myocardial infarction, patients with type 2 myocardial infarction (T2MI) are included in several value-based programs, including the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program and the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Program. To our knowledge, whether nonischemic myocardial injury is being misclassified as T2MI is unknown and may have implications for these programs.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether patients with nonischemic myocardial injury are being miscoded as having T2MI and if this has implications for 30-day readmission and mortality rates.

DESIGN, SETTINGS, AND PARTICIPANTS: Using the new International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision code, we identified patients who were coded as having T2MI between October 2017 and May 2018 at Massachusetts General Hospital. Strict adjudication using the fourth universal definition of MI was then applied.

MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES

Clinical adjudication of T2MI and 30-day readmission and mortality rates as a function of T2MI or nonischemic myocardial injury.

RESULTS

Of 633 patients, 369 (58.3%) were men and 514 (81.2%) were white. After strict adjudication, 359 (56.7%) had T2MI, 265 (41.9%) had myocardial injury, 6 (0.9%) had type 1 MI, and 3 (0.5%) had unstable angina. Patients with T2MI had a higher prevalence of cardiovascular comorbidities than those with myocardial injury. Patients with T2MI and myocardial injury had high in-hospital mortality rates (10.6% and 8.7%, respectively; P = .50). Of those discharged alive (563 [88.9%]), 30-day readmission rates (22.7% vs 21.1%; P = .68) and mortality rates (4.4% vs 7.4%; P = .14) were comparable among patients with T2MI and myocardial injury.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

A substantial percentage of patients coded as having T2MI actually have myocardial injury. Both conditions have high 30-day readmission and mortality rates. Including patients with high-risk myocardial injury may have substantial implications for value-based programs.

摘要

重要性

与其他急性心肌梗死患者类似,2 型心肌梗死(T2MI)患者被纳入了多项基于价值的计划,包括住院患者再入院率降低计划和医院基于价值的采购计划。据我们所知,非缺血性心肌损伤是否被错误分类为 T2MI 尚不清楚,这可能对这些计划产生影响。

目的

确定是否有非缺血性心肌损伤患者被错误地归类为 T2MI,如果是这样,这是否对 30 天再入院率和死亡率有影响。

设计、地点和参与者:我们使用新的国际疾病分类和相关健康问题第十次修订版代码,确定了 2017 年 10 月至 2018 年 5 月期间马萨诸塞州综合医院被编码为 T2MI 的患者。然后,我们采用第四版心肌梗死的通用定义进行了严格的裁定。

主要结果和措施

T2MI 的临床裁定以及作为 T2MI 或非缺血性心肌损伤函数的 30 天再入院率和死亡率。

结果

在 633 名患者中,369 名(58.3%)为男性,514 名(81.2%)为白人。经过严格的裁定,359 名(56.7%)患者患有 T2MI,265 名(41.9%)患者患有心肌损伤,6 名(0.9%)患者患有 1 型 MI,3 名(0.5%)患者患有不稳定型心绞痛。患有 T2MI 的患者比患有心肌损伤的患者更常见心血管合并症。患有 T2MI 和心肌损伤的患者住院期间死亡率较高(分别为 10.6%和 8.7%;P = .50)。在那些存活出院的患者中(563 [88.9%]),T2MI 和心肌损伤患者的 30 天再入院率(分别为 22.7%和 21.1%;P = .68)和死亡率(分别为 4.4%和 7.4%;P = .14)相似。

结论和相关性

被编码为 T2MI 的患者中有相当大比例的患者实际上患有心肌损伤。这两种情况的 30 天再入院率和死亡率都很高。包括高风险心肌损伤患者可能对基于价值的计划产生重大影响。