Culver Heidi R, Peppas Nicholas A
Institute for Biomaterials, Drug Delivery, and Regenerative Medicine, C0800, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, United States.
Department of Biomedical Engineering, C0800, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, United States.
Chem Mater. 2017 Jul 25;29(14):5753-5761. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b01936. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
The potential to develop materials with antibody-like molecular recognition properties has helped sustain interest in protein-imprinted polymers over the past several decades. Unfortunately, despite persistent research, the field of noncovalent protein imprinting has seen limited success in terms of achieving materials with high selectivity and high affinity. In this Perspective, important yet sometimes overlooked aspects of the imprinting and binding processes are reviewed to help understand why there has been limited success. In particular, the imprinting and binding processes are viewed through the scope of free radical polymerization and hydrogel swelling theories to underscore the complexity of the synthesis and behavior of protein-imprinted polymers. Additionally, we review the metrics of success commonly used in protein imprinting literature (i.e., adsorption capacity, imprinting factor, and selectivity factor) and consider the relevance of each to the characterization of an imprinted polymer's recognition characteristics. Throughout, common shortcomings are highlighted, and experiments that could help verify or disprove the efficacy of noncovalent protein imprinting are discussed.
在过去几十年里,开发具有类似抗体分子识别特性材料的潜力一直推动着人们对蛋白质印迹聚合物保持兴趣。遗憾的是,尽管进行了持续研究,但在实现具有高选择性和高亲和力的材料方面,非共价蛋白质印迹领域取得的成功有限。在这篇观点文章中,我们回顾了印迹和结合过程中重要但有时被忽视的方面,以帮助理解为何成功有限。特别是,从自由基聚合和水凝胶溶胀理论的角度审视印迹和结合过程,以强调蛋白质印迹聚合物合成及行为的复杂性。此外,我们还回顾了蛋白质印迹文献中常用的成功指标(即吸附容量、印迹因子和选择性因子),并考虑了每个指标与印迹聚合物识别特性表征的相关性。文中自始至终都突出了常见的不足之处,并讨论了有助于验证或反驳非共价蛋白质印迹有效性的实验。