• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实践语法:对《心理学的新逻辑基础》的阐述、一些补充以及对阿拉里克·科勒和亚历山大·波迪亚科夫的回应

A Grammar of Praxis: an Exposé of "A New Logical Foundation for Psychology", a Few Additions, and Replies to Alaric Kohler and Alexander Poddiakov.

作者信息

Mammen Jens

机构信息

Niels Bohr Professorship Centre for Cultural Psychology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.

出版信息

Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2019 Jun;53(2):223-237. doi: 10.1007/s12124-019-09487-2.

DOI:10.1007/s12124-019-09487-2
PMID:30895559
Abstract

Taking departure in the author's recent book "A New Logical Foundation for Psychology" the paper proposes a solution to the long-standing so-called crisis in psychology. The causes to this crisis are above all found in a ruling reductionist and mathematically supported mechanistic understanding of nature with roots in European Renaissance, and following that, of man's embedment in nature. This leaves no place for non-mechanistic relations to unique and irreplaceable persons and objects defining the human psyche or soul, and fundamental phenomena as love and grief are consequently not understood. No humanistic superstructure of language or systems of signs and concepts can repair this loss of a vital dimension in basic human practical relations to the world. However, it is just in modern mathematics and mathematical logic, that the reductions of mechanicism are surmounted, at the same time leaving a place for mechanicism within a broader conceptual frame and defining a rich practical basis for understanding the role of language and human concepts. The wider perspectives comprise a new union of natural and human sciences. Finally the paper presents replies to two important commentaries to the author's abovementioned book.

摘要

本文以作者最近出版的《心理学的新逻辑基础》为出发点,提出了一种解决心理学中长期存在的所谓危机的方法。这场危机的根源首先在于一种占主导地位的还原论以及在欧洲文艺复兴时期扎根并随之而来的对人类嵌入自然的数学支持的机械主义自然观。这使得与定义人类心理或灵魂的独特且不可替代的人和对象的非机械关系没有了立足之地,结果像爱和悲伤这样的基本现象就无法被理解。语言或符号与概念系统的任何人文主义上层建筑都无法弥补人类与世界基本实践关系中这一重要维度的缺失。然而,正是在现代数学和数理逻辑中,机械主义的还原被超越了,同时在更广泛的概念框架内为机械主义留出了空间,并为理解语言和人类概念的作用定义了丰富的实践基础。更广阔的视角包含了自然科学与人文科学的新结合。最后,本文对针对作者上述书籍的两篇重要评论做出了回应。

相似文献

1
A Grammar of Praxis: an Exposé of "A New Logical Foundation for Psychology", a Few Additions, and Replies to Alaric Kohler and Alexander Poddiakov.实践语法:对《心理学的新逻辑基础》的阐述、一些补充以及对阿拉里克·科勒和亚历山大·波迪亚科夫的回应
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2019 Jun;53(2):223-237. doi: 10.1007/s12124-019-09487-2.
2
Using a Topological Model in Psychology: Developing Sense and Choice Categories.在心理学中运用拓扑模型:发展意义与选择范畴
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2016 Jun;50(2):196-233. doi: 10.1007/s12124-016-9342-x.
3
Activity Theories and the Ontology of Psychology: Learning from Danish and Russian Experiences.活动理论与心理学本体论:借鉴丹麦和俄罗斯的经验
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2015 Dec;49(4):681-713. doi: 10.1007/s12124-015-9313-7.
4
A Plea for Scientific Ambitions: Reply to Commentaries from Martin Wieser, Nikolai Veresov, Asger Neumann, and Peter Krøjgaard.对科学抱负的呼吁:对马丁·维泽、尼古拉·韦列索夫、阿斯格·诺伊曼和彼得·克罗伊加德评论的回应
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2016 Sep;50(3):368-81. doi: 10.1007/s12124-016-9351-9.
5
A Relational Ontology for Psychology: Life as an Asymmetric Subjet-Object Choosing Relation : Review of A New Logical Foundation for Psychology, J. Mammen, Springer, 2017.一种心理学的关系本体论:作为不对称主客体选择关系的生命——评《心理学的新逻辑基础》,J. 马门著,施普林格出版社,2017年
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2019 Jun;53(2):189-198. doi: 10.1007/s12124-018-9460-8.
6
From computing with numbers to computing with words. From manipulation of measurements to manipulation of perceptions.从数字计算到词语计算。从测量操作到感知操作。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2001 Apr;929:221-52.
7
Exploring the conceptual universe.探索概念宇宙。
Psychol Rev. 2012 Oct;119(4):685-722. doi: 10.1037/a0029347. Epub 2012 Aug 27.
8
Looking for a Symphony: A Sort of Essay with a Perspective on Activity Theories and the Ontology of Psychology: Learning from Danish and Russian Experiences by Jens Mammen & Irina Mironenko.寻找一部交响曲:一篇带有对活动理论及心理学本体论观点的随笔:借鉴丹麦和俄罗斯的经验 作者:延斯·马门与伊琳娜·米罗年科
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2016 Jun;50(2):257-63. doi: 10.1007/s12124-015-9332-4.
9
Language, procedures, and the non-perceptual origin of number word meanings.语言、程序与数词意义的非感知起源
J Child Lang. 2017 May;44(3):553-590. doi: 10.1017/S0305000917000058. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
10
The foundation of Piaget's theories: mental and physical action.皮亚杰理论的基础:心理和身体行为。
Adv Child Dev Behav. 1999;27:221-46. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2407(08)60140-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Towards an Algebra of Existence and Development of Unique Subjects with Unique Minds: a Commentary to Jens Mammen's Book.
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2019 Jun;53(2):199-206. doi: 10.1007/s12124-018-9468-0.
2
A Relational Ontology for Psychology: Life as an Asymmetric Subjet-Object Choosing Relation : Review of A New Logical Foundation for Psychology, J. Mammen, Springer, 2017.一种心理学的关系本体论:作为不对称主客体选择关系的生命——评《心理学的新逻辑基础》,J. 马门著,施普林格出版社,2017年
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2019 Jun;53(2):189-198. doi: 10.1007/s12124-018-9460-8.
3
A Plea for Scientific Ambitions: Reply to Commentaries from Martin Wieser, Nikolai Veresov, Asger Neumann, and Peter Krøjgaard.对科学抱负的呼吁:对马丁·维泽、尼古拉·韦列索夫、阿斯格·诺伊曼和彼得·克罗伊加德评论的回应
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2016 Sep;50(3):368-81. doi: 10.1007/s12124-016-9351-9.
4
Activity Theories and the Ontology of Psychology: Learning from Danish and Russian Experiences.活动理论与心理学本体论:借鉴丹麦和俄罗斯的经验
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2015 Dec;49(4):681-713. doi: 10.1007/s12124-015-9313-7.