Suppr超能文献

韩国老年人五种连线测验类型的比较

A Comparison of Five Types of Trail Making Test in Korean Elderly.

作者信息

Jang Jae-Won, Kim Karyeong, Baek Min Jae, Kim SangYun

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Kangwon National University Hospital, Chuncheon, Korea.

Clinical Neuroscience Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.

出版信息

Dement Neurocogn Disord. 2016 Dec;15(4):135-141. doi: 10.12779/dnd.2016.15.4.135. Epub 2016 Dec 31.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Previously developed Korean versions of the Trail Making Test (TMT) that replaced the English in part B, has been unsuccessful in Korea. The current study identifies the type of TMT tasks from the among multiple TMT versions, which practically and accurately detects the stage of cognitive decline.

METHODS

We applied five TMT versions, which include the original TMT, TMT-Korean letter (TMT-KL), TMT-Korean consonant (TMT-KC), TMT-black and white (TMT-B&W), and TMT-square and circle (TMT-S&C). A total of 168 participants were enrolled: 42 cognitively normal controls (NC), 72 patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and 54 patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). Two sets of TMT (set "A" including TMT, TMT-KL and TMT-B&W, and set "B" including TMT, TMT-KC, and TMT-S&C) were randomly administered to subjects within the contact of a fixed neuropsychological battery.

RESULTS

The completion times of TMT-B and TMT-B&W successfully distinguished NC from MCI and AD. TMT-B&W also showed a high correlation with other neuropsychological tests, and correlated well with the original TMT. The other TMT were frequently not successfully completed, nor could they differentiate the clinical groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Among the five TMT tasks, the original TMT and the TMT-B&W appeared to be most sensitive to the degree of cognitive impairment. TMT-B&W showed a pattern consistent with the original TMT; thus, this measure may be optimal in Korean older adults, where familiarity with the English alphabet is questionable.

摘要

背景与目的

先前开发的韩国版连线测验(TMT),其中B部分用韩语替代了英语,在韩国并不成功。本研究从多个TMT版本中确定能切实准确检测认知衰退阶段的TMT任务类型。

方法

我们应用了五个TMT版本,包括原始TMT、韩国字母版TMT(TMT-KL)、韩国辅音版TMT(TMT-KC)、黑白版TMT(TMT-B&W)和方形圆形版TMT(TMT-S&C)。共招募了168名参与者:42名认知正常对照者(NC)、72名轻度认知障碍患者(MCI)和54名阿尔茨海默病患者(AD)。在固定的神经心理测验组合中,随机向受试者施测两组TMT(A组包括TMT、TMT-KL和TMT-B&W,B组包括TMT、TMT-KC和TMT-S&C)。

结果

TMT-B和TMT-B&W的完成时间成功区分了NC与MCI及AD。TMT-B&W与其他神经心理测验也显示出高度相关性,且与原始TMT相关性良好。其他TMT常常无法成功完成,也不能区分临床组。

结论

在这五个TMT任务中,原始TMT和TMT-B&W似乎对认知障碍程度最为敏感。TMT-B&W呈现出与原始TMT一致的模式;因此,在对英语字母表熟悉程度存疑的韩国老年人中,该测量方法可能是最佳的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2505/6428017/4fdebb32f2fb/dnd-15-135-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验