Chem Res Toxicol. 2019 Apr 15;32(4):536-547. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.8b00393. Epub 2019 Mar 25.
In 2016, the Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act became the first US legislation to advance chemical safety evaluations by utilizing novel testing approaches that reduce the testing of vertebrate animals. Central to this mission is the advancement of computational toxicology and artificial intelligence approaches to implementing innovative testing methods. In the current big data era, the terms volume (amount of data), velocity (growth of data), and variety (the diversity of sources) have been used to characterize the currently available chemical, in vitro, and in vivo data for toxicity modeling purposes. Furthermore, as suggested by various scientists, the variability (internal consistency or lack thereof) of publicly available data pools, such as PubChem, also presents significant computational challenges. The development of novel artificial intelligence approaches based on public massive toxicity data is urgently needed to generate new predictive models for chemical toxicity evaluations and make the developed models applicable as alternatives for evaluating untested compounds. In this procedure, traditional approaches (e.g., QSAR) purely based on chemical structures have been replaced by newly designed data-driven and mechanism-driven modeling. The resulting models realize the concept of adverse outcome pathway (AOP), which can not only directly evaluate toxicity potentials of new compounds, but also illustrate relevant toxicity mechanisms. The recent advancement of computational toxicology in the big data era has paved the road to future toxicity testing, which will significantly impact on the public health.
2016 年,《21 世纪弗兰克·R·劳滕伯格化学安全法案》成为第一项推进化学安全评估的美国立法,该法案利用减少脊椎动物测试的新型测试方法。这项任务的核心是推进计算毒理学和人工智能方法,以实施创新的测试方法。在当前的大数据时代,术语“量(数据量)”、“速(数据增长)”和“多样性(来源多样性)”已被用于描述目前可用于毒性建模目的的化学、体外和体内数据。此外,正如多位科学家所建议的,PubChem 等公共数据池的可变性(内部一致性或缺乏内部一致性)也带来了重大的计算挑战。迫切需要基于公共海量毒性数据开发新的人工智能方法,以生成新的化学毒性评估预测模型,并使开发的模型能够作为评估未测试化合物的替代方法。在这个过程中,传统的方法(例如,QSAR)纯粹基于化学结构,已经被新设计的数据驱动和机制驱动的建模所取代。由此产生的模型实现了不良结局途径(AOP)的概念,不仅可以直接评估新化合物的毒性潜力,还可以说明相关的毒性机制。计算毒理学在大数据时代的最新进展为未来的毒性测试铺平了道路,这将对公众健康产生重大影响。