Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Centro Hospitalar S. João EPE, Porto, Portugal.
CINTESIS - Center for Health Technology and Services Research, Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto, Portugal.
J Med Microbiol. 2019 May;68(5):778-784. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.000966. Epub 2019 Mar 25.
Clinical epidemiological data about the distinct Malassezia species remain scarce. The recurrence of Malassezia-related skin diseases, despite long-term use of antifungals, raises concern about the hypothetical emergence of antifungal resistance. We aimed to assess the distribution of Malassezia species among patients from a University Hospital with pityriasis versicolor, seborrheic dermatitis and healthy volunteers, and to evaluate the susceptibility profile to classic antifungals and over-the-counter compounds, searching for clinical associations.
The enrollment of volunteers was conducted at the Dermatology Department of a University Hospital over a 3 year period. Malassezia culture isolates were identified to the species-level by sequencing. The drug susceptibility profile was assessed according to a broth microdilution assay, as recommended by the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute.
A total of 86 Malassezia isolates were recovered from 182 volunteers. Malassezia sympodialis was the most frequent isolated species. We found high MIC values and a wide MIC range in the case of tested azoles, and very low terbinafine MIC values against most isolates. Previous topical corticosteroid therapy was associated with a significant increase of MIC values of fluconazole and of terbinafine.
Conversely to other European studies, M. sympodialis was the most common isolated species, which might be related to geographic reasons. The impact of previous topical corticotherapy upon the antifungal susceptibility profile was hereby demonstrated. In vitro susceptibility test results suggest that terbinafine might be a valid alternative for Malassezia-related skin diseases nonresponsive to azoles.
关于不同马拉色菌物种的临床流行病学数据仍然很少。尽管长期使用抗真菌药物,但马拉色菌相关皮肤病的复发引起了人们对抗真菌药物耐药性出现的假设的关注。我们旨在评估来自一家大学医院患有花斑癣、脂溢性皮炎和健康志愿者的患者中马拉色菌物种的分布,并评估对经典抗真菌药物和非处方化合物的敏感性谱,寻找临床关联。
在大学医院皮肤科进行志愿者招募,时间为 3 年。通过测序将马拉色菌培养分离株鉴定到种水平。根据临床实验室标准研究所推荐的肉汤微量稀释法评估药物敏感性谱。
从 182 名志愿者中总共回收了 86 株马拉色菌分离株。副枝孢菌是最常见的分离物种。我们发现测试唑类药物的 MIC 值较高且范围较宽,而大多数分离株的特比萘芬 MIC 值非常低。先前的局部皮质类固醇治疗与氟康唑和特比萘芬 MIC 值的显著增加相关。
与其他欧洲研究相反,副枝孢菌是最常见的分离物种,这可能与地理位置有关。本文证明了先前局部皮质激素治疗对抗真菌药物敏感性谱的影响。体外药敏试验结果表明,特比萘芬可能是对唑类药物反应不佳的马拉色菌相关皮肤病的有效替代药物。