Chai Shirlie, Kueh Yee Cheng, Yaacob Najib Majdi, Kuan Garry
Unit of Biostatistics and Research Methodology, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia.
Miri Hospital, Jalan Cahaya, 98000, Miri, Sarawak, Malaysia.
Malays J Med Sci. 2019 Jan;26(1):115-124. doi: 10.21315/mjms2019.26.1.11. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
Understanding the individual aspirations of exercise participation is important for promoting physical activity. However, there is a lack of evidence to validate a measurement instrument for exercise-based goal content among Malaysian populations. The purpose of this study was to determine the validity and reliability of the Malay version of the Goal Content in Exercise Questionnaire (GCEQ) for a sample of Malaysian undergraduates.
The original English version of the GCEQ underwent forward and backward translation into the Malay language. A cross-sectional study was conducted. The finalised Malay version was administered to 674 undergraduate students at the Health Campus of the Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM) with a mean age of 20.27 years (SD = 1.35 years). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted for the psychometric evaluation.
The measurement model consisted of 20 observed items and five latent factors. CFA demonstrated adequate fit to the data: comparative fit index = 0.929; standardised root mean square residual = 0.052; root mean square error of approximation = 0.061 (90% CI = 0.056, 0.067). The composite reliability coefficients for the five latent factors ranged from 0.777 to 0.851. All the correlations between the factors were less than 0.85, so discriminant validity was achieved.
The findings suggested that the Malay version of the GCEQ is valid and reliable for assessing goal content in the exercise context of undergraduates at the Health Campus, USM.
了解个体参与运动的愿望对于促进体育活动很重要。然而,缺乏证据来验证马来西亚人群中基于运动的目标内容测量工具。本研究的目的是确定马来语版运动问卷目标内容(GCEQ)在马来西亚大学生样本中的有效性和可靠性。
GCEQ的原始英文版经过正向和反向翻译为马来语。进行了一项横断面研究。最终确定的马来语版问卷被发放给马来西亚理科大学(USM)健康校区的674名本科生,他们的平均年龄为20.27岁(标准差 = 1.35岁)。进行验证性因素分析(CFA)以进行心理测量评估。
测量模型由20个观测项目和五个潜在因素组成。CFA表明数据拟合良好:比较拟合指数 = 0.929;标准化均方根残差 = 0.052;近似均方根误差 = 0.061(90%置信区间 = 0.056, 0.067)。五个潜在因素的组合信度系数范围为0.777至0.851。各因素之间的所有相关性均小于0.85,因此实现了区分效度。
研究结果表明,马来语版GCEQ在评估USM健康校区本科生运动背景下的目标内容方面是有效且可靠的。