Odeh Mohammad, Levin Dmitry, Inziello Jim, Lobo Fenoglietto Fluvio, Mathur Moses, Hermsen Joshua, Stubbs Jack, Ripley Beth
Institute for Simulation and Training, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA.
Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
3D Print Med. 2019 Mar 29;5(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s41205-019-0043-1.
Medical 3D printing has brought the manufacturing world closer to the patient's bedside than ever before. This requires hospitals and their personnel to update their quality assurance program to more appropriately accommodate the 3D printing fabrication process and the challenges that come along with it.
In this paper, we explored different methods for verifying the accuracy of a 3D printed anatomical model. Methods included physical measurements, digital photographic measurements, surface scanning, photogrammetry, and computed tomography (CT) scans. The details of each verification method, as well as their benefits and challenges, are discussed.
There are multiple methods for model verification, each with benefits and drawbacks. The choice of which method to adopt into a quality assurance program is multifactorial and will depend on the type of 3D printed models being created, the training of personnel, and what resources are available within a 3D printed laboratory.
医学3D打印使制造业比以往任何时候都更接近患者床边。这要求医院及其工作人员更新其质量保证计划,以更适当地适应3D打印制造过程及其带来的挑战。
在本文中,我们探索了验证3D打印解剖模型准确性的不同方法。方法包括物理测量、数码摄影测量、表面扫描、摄影测量和计算机断层扫描(CT)。讨论了每种验证方法的细节及其优点和挑战。
有多种模型验证方法,每种方法都有优缺点。在质量保证计划中采用哪种方法的选择是多因素的,将取决于所创建的3D打印模型的类型、人员培训以及3D打印实验室中可用的资源。