Curran Evonne T, Wilkinson Martyn, Bradley Tina
School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.
Hospital Infection Research Laboratory, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
J Infect Prev. 2019 Mar;20(2):76-82. doi: 10.1177/1757177419828139. Epub 2019 Mar 5.
In recent years, the number of disinfectants designed to decontaminate healthcare environments and reusable, non-invasive care equipment (NICE) has increased markedly, making the selection of the most appropriate disinfectant a somewhat daunting prospect. In addition to the microbial challenge, there are numerous factors to consider including: efficacy; range and speed of activity; stability of the ingredients; compatibility of the disinfectant with surfaces; inactivation of the disinfectant by organic matter; method of application; convenience; health and safety concerns; and cost. While the microbial challenge continues to evolve, and novel disinfectants continue to emerge, guidance updates have been notably absent. Most healthcare surfaces belong to a UK-defined category of 'low risk' for which guidance dictates 'cleaning and drying is usually sufficient'. This paper assesses the evidence and arguments regarding the use of disinfectants for low-risk healthcare surfaces. A novel subcategorisation of 'low risk' is presented to provide a more specific up-to-date disinfectant needs assessment.
近年来,旨在对医疗环境及可重复使用的非侵入性护理设备(NICE)进行消毒的消毒剂数量显著增加,这使得选择最合适的消毒剂成为一项颇具挑战性的任务。除了微生物方面的挑战外,还有许多因素需要考虑,包括:效力;活性范围和速度;成分稳定性;消毒剂与表面的兼容性;有机物对消毒剂的灭活作用;应用方法;便利性;健康和安全问题;以及成本。尽管微生物挑战不断演变,新型消毒剂也不断涌现,但显著缺乏指南更新。大多数医疗表面属于英国定义的“低风险”类别,对此类表面的指南规定“清洁和干燥通常就足够了”。本文评估了有关在低风险医疗表面使用消毒剂的证据和观点。提出了一种新的“低风险”子分类,以提供更具体的最新消毒剂需求评估。