Wheeler David C, Ward Mary H, Waller Lance A
Department of Biostatistics, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Address: One Capitol Square, 7th Floor, Room 733; 830 East Main Street; P.O. Box 980032; Richmond, VA 23298-0032,
Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Address: 6120 Executive Boulevard; Executive Plaza South, Room 8006; Bethesda, MD 20892-7335,
Ann Assoc Am Geogr. 2012;102(5):1049-1052. doi: 10.1080/00045608.2012.671131. Epub 2012 Apr 26.
Exploring spatial-temporal patterns of disease incidence identifies areas of significantly elevated risk and can lead to discoveries of disease risk factors. One popular way to investigate patterns in risk over space and time is spatial-temporal cluster detection analysis. The identification of significant clusters may lead to etiological hypotheses to explain the pattern of elevated risk and to additional epidemiologic studies to explore these hypotheses. Several methodological issues and data challenges that arise in space-time cluster analysis of chronic diseases, such as cancer, include poor spatial precision of residence locations, long disease latencies, and adjustment for known risk factors. This paper reviews the key challenges faced when performing cluster analyses of chronic diseases and presents a spatial-temporal analysis of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) risk addressing these challenges. Residential histories, collected as part of a population-based case-control study of NHL (the National Cancer Institute [NCI]-Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results [SEER] NHL study) in four SEER centers (Detroit metropolitan area, Los Angeles, California, Seattle metropolitan area, and Iowa) were geocoded. In this analysis, we explored previously detected spatial-temporal clusters and adjusted for exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and genetic polymorphisms in four genes, previously found to be associated with NHL, using a generalized additive model framework. We found that the genetic factors and PCB exposure did not fully explain previously detected areas of elevated risk.
探索疾病发病率的时空模式可识别出风险显著升高的区域,并可能带来疾病风险因素的发现。一种研究风险在空间和时间上模式的常用方法是时空聚类检测分析。识别出显著聚类可能会引出病因假设以解释风险升高的模式,并引发更多流行病学研究来探索这些假设。在对癌症等慢性病进行时空聚类分析时出现的几个方法学问题和数据挑战,包括居住地点的空间精度差、疾病潜伏期长以及对已知风险因素的调整。本文回顾了在对慢性病进行聚类分析时面临的关键挑战,并针对这些挑战对非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)风险进行了时空分析。作为在四个监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)中心(底特律都会区、加利福尼亚州洛杉矶、西雅图都会区和爱荷华州)进行的基于人群的NHL病例对照研究(国家癌症研究所[NCI]-SEER NHL研究)的一部分收集的居住史进行了地理编码。在这项分析中,我们探索了先前检测到的时空聚类,并使用广义相加模型框架对先前发现与NHL相关的四种基因中的多氯联苯(PCB)暴露和基因多态性进行了调整。我们发现遗传因素和PCB暴露并不能完全解释先前检测到的风险升高区域。