Phillips Christine B, Hurley Jane C, Angadi Siddhartha S, Todd Michael, Berardi Vincent, Hovell Melbourne F, Adams Marc A
College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University.
College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University.
Behav Med. 2020 Apr-Jun;46(2):142-152. doi: 10.1080/08964289.2019.1570071. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
Financial incentives can increase physical activity (PA), but differences in the immediacy of reward delivery and individual differences in delay discount rates (i.e., higher discount values associated with less tolerance for delayed rewards) may explain differential responding. The current study tested whether delay discount rate moderated the relative effectiveness of immediate financial rewards on increasing daily PA. Inactive, overweight adults (ages 18-60, N = 96) were randomized to receive either smaller, immediate goal-contingent rewards or larger, delayed rewards for participation. Delay discount rates were derived for those who completed the Monetary Choice Questionnaire (N = 85). Linear mixed models tested interactions between discount rate and intervention arm on changes in mean daily Fitbit-measured steps from baseline to intervention phases, and rates of change during the intervention phase. Across all groups, participants increased by 2258 steps/day on average from baseline to intervention and declined by 9 steps/day across the 4-month intervention phase. The mean increase in daily steps was greater for immediate reward-arm participants across all discount rates. Descriptive exploration of reward effects by delay discount rate suggested that the magnitude of reward effects decreased at higher discount rates. During the 4-month intervention phase, rates of decline in daily steps were similar in both reward arms, but declines became more pronounced at higher discount rates. Overall, intervention efficacy decreased with less tolerance for delays. The importance of financial reward immediacy for increasing PA appears to increase with greater delay discount rates.
经济激励措施可以增加身体活动(PA),但奖励发放的即时性差异以及延迟折扣率的个体差异(即较高的折扣值与对延迟奖励的较低容忍度相关)可能解释了不同的反应。本研究测试了延迟折扣率是否调节了即时经济奖励对增加每日身体活动的相对有效性。将不活跃的超重成年人(年龄18 - 60岁,N = 96)随机分组,一组为较小的即时目标达成奖励,另一组为较大的延迟奖励。对完成货币选择问卷的参与者(N = 85)计算延迟折扣率。线性混合模型测试了折扣率与干预组之间在从基线到干预阶段平均每日通过Fitbit测量的步数变化以及干预阶段变化率方面的相互作用。在所有组中,参与者从基线到干预阶段平均每天增加2258步,在4个月的干预阶段中每天减少9步。在所有折扣率下,即时奖励组参与者的每日步数平均增加幅度更大。按延迟折扣率对奖励效果进行的描述性探索表明,在较高折扣率下奖励效果的幅度会降低。在4个月的干预阶段,两个奖励组的每日步数下降率相似,但在较高折扣率下下降更为明显。总体而言,随着对延迟的容忍度降低,干预效果下降。经济奖励即时性对增加身体活动的重要性似乎随着延迟折扣率的增加而增加。