• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

北美大众媒体中的 CRISPR。

CRISPR in the North American popular press.

机构信息

Health Law Institute, Faculty of Law, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

Biomedical Ethics Research Program and Center for Regenerative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

出版信息

Genet Med. 2019 Oct;21(10):2184-2189. doi: 10.1038/s41436-019-0482-5. Epub 2019 Apr 12.

DOI:10.1038/s41436-019-0482-5
PMID:30976097
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6774996/
Abstract

PURPOSE

CRISPR is often called one of the century's most important discoveries and is commonly discussed in terms of its momentous potential impacts. This study analyzed how CRISPR is discussed in the North American popular press, including how it is defined, and which benefits and risks/concerns are attributed to the technology.

METHODS

Using the Factiva database, we identified 228 relevant, nonduplicated articles containing either "CRISPR" or "C.R.I.S.P.R.," published in popular US and Canadian news sources between 1 January 2012 and 12 July 2017. Content analysis was performed on the articles.

RESULTS

CRISPR is most often discussed in the context of human health (83.8%), compared with animals (26.3%) and plants (20.6%). Nearly all articles (96.1%) presented CRISPR's potential benefits; 61.4% of articles presented CRISPR-related risks/concerns, the vast majority of which focused on the uncertainty surrounding CRISPR, specifically with respect to germline modifications.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the discourse suggests a strong promotion of CRISPR, but an element of caution is also evident. Technical as well as ethical, legal, and social risks/concerns play a prominent role. This media portrayal of CRISPR might help facilitate more sophisticated and balanced policy responses, where the scientific potential of the technology is highlighted alongside broader social considerations.

摘要

目的

CRISPR 常被誉为本世纪最重要的发现之一,其具有重大潜在影响,这一点被广泛讨论。本研究分析了北美大众媒体对 CRISPR 的讨论方式,包括如何对其进行定义,以及该技术被认为具有哪些益处和风险/关注点。

方法

我们使用 Factiva 数据库,确定了 2012 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 7 月 12 日期间在北美流行新闻来源中发表的 228 篇非重复相关文章,其中包含“CRISPR”或“C.R.I.S.P.R.”。对文章进行内容分析。

结果

与动物(26.3%)和植物(20.6%)相比,CRISPR 最常被讨论用于人类健康(83.8%)。几乎所有文章(96.1%)都介绍了 CRISPR 的潜在益处;61.4%的文章介绍了与 CRISPR 相关的风险/关注点,其中绝大多数关注的是围绕 CRISPR 的不确定性,特别是在生殖系修饰方面。

结论

总体而言,这一论述表明对 CRISPR 的大力推广,但也存在一定程度的谨慎。技术以及伦理、法律和社会风险/关注点发挥了突出作用。媒体对 CRISPR 的这种描述可能有助于促成更复杂和平衡的政策反应,在强调该技术的科学潜力的同时,还考虑到更广泛的社会因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97a1/6774996/5425ba545c89/41436_2019_482_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97a1/6774996/0fac511b3d2e/41436_2019_482_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97a1/6774996/5425ba545c89/41436_2019_482_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97a1/6774996/0fac511b3d2e/41436_2019_482_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97a1/6774996/5425ba545c89/41436_2019_482_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
CRISPR in the North American popular press.北美大众媒体中的 CRISPR。
Genet Med. 2019 Oct;21(10):2184-2189. doi: 10.1038/s41436-019-0482-5. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
2
CRISPR off-targets: a question of context.CRISPR的脱靶效应:背景问题
Cell Biol Toxicol. 2020 Feb;36(1):5-9. doi: 10.1007/s10565-019-09497-1. Epub 2019 Nov 16.
3
Therapeutic and diagnostic relevance of Crispr technology.CRISPR 技术的治疗和诊断相关性。
Biomed Pharmacother. 2021 Jun;138:111487. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2021.111487. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
4
Playing God? Media coverage of CRISPR in the United States.扮演上帝?美国媒体对 CRISPR 的报道。
Public Underst Sci. 2023 May;32(4):504-521. doi: 10.1177/09636625221138953. Epub 2022 Dec 17.
5
CRISPR: express delivery to any DNA address.CRISPR:向任何DNA地址的快速递送。
Oral Dis. 2017 Jan;23(1):5-11. doi: 10.1111/odi.12487. Epub 2016 May 17.
6
Starting the conversation: CRISPR's role in India.开启对话:CRISPR在印度的作用。
Indian J Med Ethics. 2019 Oct-Dec;4 (NS)(4):300-303. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2019.016. Epub 2019 Apr 18.
7
[Crispr-Cas9 Gene Editing Revolution and the Its Ethical and Legal Challenges].[CRISPR-Cas9基因编辑革命及其伦理和法律挑战]
Cuad Bioet. 2016 May-Aug;27(90):223-39.
8
The Promise of CRISPR for Human Germline Editing and the Perils of "Playing God".CRISPR 技术用于人类生殖系编辑的承诺与“扮演上帝”的危险。
CRISPR J. 2020 Feb;3(1):27-31. doi: 10.1089/crispr.2019.0033.
9
Development and application of CRISPR/Cas9 technologies in genomic editing.CRISPR/Cas9 技术在基因组编辑中的发展与应用。
Hum Mol Genet. 2018 Aug 1;27(R2):R79-R88. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddy120.
10
Five big mysteries about CRISPR's origins.关于CRISPR起源的五大谜团。
Nature. 2017 Jan 12;541(7637):280-282. doi: 10.1038/541280a.

引用本文的文献

1
Descriptions of Scientific Evidence and Uncertainty of Unproven COVID-19 Therapies in US News: Content Analysis Study.美国新闻中未经证实的 COVID-19 疗法的科学证据和不确定性描述:内容分析研究。
JMIR Infodemiology. 2024 Aug 29;4:e51328. doi: 10.2196/51328.
2
Wikipedia as a tool for contemporary history of science: A case study on CRISPR.维基百科作为科学当代史的工具:以 CRISPR 为例。
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 13;18(9):e0290827. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290827. eCollection 2023.
3
The Gene-Edited Babies Controversy: Reactions in the Scientific Community, Social Media, and the Press.

本文引用的文献

1
Ethical Issues of Using CRISPR Technologies for Research on Military Enhancement.将CRISPR技术用于军事增强研究的伦理问题。
J Bioeth Inq. 2018 Sep;15(3):327-335. doi: 10.1007/s11673-018-9865-6. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
2
Representing a "revolution": how the popular press has portrayed personalized medicine.代表“革命”:大众媒体如何描述个性化医学。
Genet Med. 2018 Sep;20(9):950-956. doi: 10.1038/gim.2017.217. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
3
Examining the Gap between Science and Public Opinion about Genetically Modified Food and Global Warming.
基因编辑婴儿争议:科学界、社交媒体和媒体的反应。
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2023;1429:191-204. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-33325-5_11.
4
Exploring the Impact of Tensions in Stakeholder Norms on Designing for Value Change: The Case of Biosafety in Industrial Biotechnology.探讨利益相关者规范中的紧张关系对价值变革设计的影响:以工业生物技术中的生物安全为例。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2023 Mar 7;29(2):9. doi: 10.1007/s11948-023-00432-6.
5
Polygenic risk scoring of human embryos: a qualitative study of media coverage.多基因风险评分在人类胚胎中的应用:媒体报道的定性研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Sep 18;22(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00694-4.
6
'Gut health' and the microbiome in the popular press: a content analysis.“肠道健康”和大众媒体中的微生物组:内容分析。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 29;11(7):e052446. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052446.
7
Assessing Public Opinion on CRISPR-Cas9: Combining Crowdsourcing and Deep Learning.评估公众对 CRISPR-Cas9 的看法:众包与深度学习相结合。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 31;22(8):e17830. doi: 10.2196/17830.
审视科学与公众对转基因食品和全球变暖的看法之间的差距。
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 9;11(11):e0166140. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166140. eCollection 2016.
4
Applications of CRISPR technologies in research and beyond.CRISPR技术在研究及其他领域的应用。
Nat Biotechnol. 2016;34(9):933-941. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3659. Epub 2016 Sep 8.
5
Ethics and germline gene editing.伦理与生殖系基因编辑。
EMBO Rep. 2015 Aug;16(8):879-80. doi: 10.15252/embr.201540879. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
6
CRISPR germline engineering--the community speaks.CRISPR种系工程——学界发声。
Nat Biotechnol. 2015 May;33(5):478-86. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3227.
7
Stem cell hype: media portrayal of therapy translation.干细胞热:媒体对疗法转化的描述。
Sci Transl Med. 2015 Mar 11;7(278):278ps4. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3010496.
8
Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic.组内一致性:kappa 统计量。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012;22(3):276-82.
9
Myriad and the mass media: the covering of a gene patent controversy.麦利亚德公司与大众媒体:一场基因专利争议的报道
Genet Med. 2007 Dec;9(12):850-5. doi: 10.1097/gim.0b013e31815bf965.
10
Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.定性内容分析的三种方法。
Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88. doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687.