University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, The Neurological Institute, Department of Neurosurgery, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, 44106 OH, USA; Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, 2109 Adelbert Road, Cleveland, 44106 OH, USA.
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, The Neurological Institute, Department of Neurosurgery, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, 44106 OH, USA; Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, 2109 Adelbert Road, Cleveland, 44106 OH, USA.
J Neuroradiol. 2022 May;49(3):305-308. doi: 10.1016/j.neurad.2019.03.013. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
Given the high morbidity and mortality of stroke, there remains a demand for techniques that provide rapid and safe intervention while improving time to recanalization. The direct aspiration first pass technique (ADAPT) uses force and aspiration for clot removal without the aid of separators or retrievers. In this study, we compare the force and aspiration qualities of commercially available catheters.
Four different catheters with varying inner diameters were set up in a bench top model to test catheter tip pressure and flow rate. Catheter tip pressure was measured by attaching the catheter to a vacuum pressure gauge and an aspiration pump. The flow rate was calculated by measuring the volume of room temperature water aspirated through each catheter over a given time.
The Microvention Sofia catheter generated the greatest tip force (21.32 g), and the Stryker AXS Catalyst 6 catheter generated the smallest tip force (15.88 g). The Penumbra ACE 068 catheter and Medtronic ARC catheter measured 20.87 g and 16.78 g respectively. The ACE 068 had highest rate of aspiration at 289 mL/min, and the Catalyst 6 catheter had the lowest rate at 214. The Microvention Sofia catheter had the second highest rate while the ARC had the third highest rate, measuring 285 mL/min and 256 mL/min, respectively.
When using the ADAPT technique, knowledge of the tip force and catheter flow rate of newer catheters with larger distal inner diameters may guide selection of aspiration catheters. While this study demonstrates differences in tip force and flow rate of different commercially available catheters, clinical translation will require further testing and evaluation.
鉴于中风的高发病率和死亡率,仍然需要技术来提供快速和安全的干预,同时提高再通时间。直接抽吸首过技术(ADAPT)使用力和抽吸来清除血栓,而无需分离器或取栓器的帮助。在这项研究中,我们比较了几种市售导管的力和抽吸性能。
将四种不同内径的导管在台式模型中进行设置,以测试导管尖端压力和流速。通过将导管连接到真空压力表和抽吸泵来测量导管尖端压力。通过测量在给定时间内通过每个导管抽吸的室温水的体积来计算流速。
Microvention Sofia 导管产生的尖端力最大(21.32g),而 Stryker AXS Catalyst 6 导管产生的尖端力最小(15.88g)。Penumbra ACE 068 导管和 Medtronic ARC 导管分别测量为 20.87g 和 16.78g。ACE 068 的抽吸速度最高,为 289mL/min,而 Catalyst 6 导管的抽吸速度最低,为 214mL/min。Microvention Sofia 导管的抽吸速度第二高,而 ARC 导管的抽吸速度第三高,分别为 285mL/min 和 256mL/min。
在使用 ADAPT 技术时,了解具有较大远端内径的新型导管的尖端力和导管流速,可以指导抽吸导管的选择。虽然这项研究表明了不同市售导管的尖端力和流速存在差异,但临床转化还需要进一步的测试和评估。