Suppr超能文献

大口径抽吸导管性能的实验评估

Experimental evaluation of the performance of large bore aspiration catheters.

作者信息

Reymond Philippe, Brina Olivier, Girdhar Gaurav, Bolanos Oscar, Lovblad Karl-Olof, Machi Paolo

机构信息

Division of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Geneva University Hospitals, 4 rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil, Geneva CH-1205, Switzerland.

Neurovascular Division, Medtronic, Irvine, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Neuroradiol. 2023 Feb;50(1):74-78. doi: 10.1016/j.neurad.2022.02.007. Epub 2022 Feb 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Mechanical thrombectomy using an aspiration catheter (AC) is widely performed in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion. AC diameter directly impacts aspiration performance, which has led device companies to develop large bore ACs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the in vitro performance of several commercially available large bore ACs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conceived an experimental set up to assess tracking force, aspiration flow rate, and distal end tensile force pre- and post-thrombectomy of ACs including Sofia 6 (Microvention Inc., California, USA), React 71 (Medtronic Neurovascular, Irvine, California, USA), Jet 7 (Penumbra Inc, Alameda, California, USA), Catalyst 7 (Stryker Neurovascular, Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA) and Embovac 071 (Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd, UK).

RESULTS

React 71 and Sofia 6 had significantly lower trackability force compared to the other ACs tested. Distal AC segment tensile force was highest for React 71 and lowest for Jet 7. Jet 7 had the highest internal diameter and the highest aspiration flow rate.

CONCLUSION

The data from this comparative analysis may assist clinicians in selecting the appropriate AC and highlights the need for key performance criteria during the development of next-generation large-bore ACs for optimal AC performance.

摘要

背景与目的

对于因大血管闭塞导致的急性缺血性卒中患者,使用抽吸导管(AC)进行机械取栓术已广泛开展。AC的直径直接影响抽吸性能,这促使器械公司研发大口径AC。本研究的目的是评估几种市售大口径AC的体外性能。

材料与方法

我们设计了一个实验装置,以评估包括Sofia 6(美国加利福尼亚州Microvention公司)、React 71(美国加利福尼亚州尔湾市美敦力神经血管公司)、Jet 7(美国加利福尼亚州阿拉米达市Penumbra公司)、Catalyst 7(美国密歇根州卡拉马祖市史赛克神经血管公司)和Embovac 071(英国强生医疗有限公司)在内的AC在血栓切除术前后的追踪力、抽吸流速和远端拉伸力。

结果

与其他测试的AC相比,React 71和Sofia 6的可追踪力显著更低。React 71的AC远端节段拉伸力最高,Jet 7的最低。Jet 7的内径最大,抽吸流速也最高。

结论

该对比分析的数据可能有助于临床医生选择合适的AC,并突出了在开发下一代大口径AC以实现最佳AC性能时关键性能标准的必要性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验