Department of Infectious Diseases, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
Department of Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA.
Integr Comp Biol. 2019 Nov 1;59(5):1138-1149. doi: 10.1093/icb/icz023.
Regeneration is rare in mammals, but spiny mice (Acomys spp.) naturally regenerate skin and ear holes. Inflammation is thought to inhibit regeneration during wound healing, but aspects of inflammation contribute to both regeneration and pathogen defense. We compared neutrophil traits among uninjured, regeneration-competent (Acomys: A. cahirinus, A. kempi, A. percivali) and -incompetent (Mus musculus: Swiss Webster, wild-caught strains) murids to test for constitutive differences in neutrophil quantity and function between these groups. Neutrophil quantity differed significantly among species. In blood, Acomys had lower percentages of circulating neutrophils than Mus; and in bone marrow, Acomys had higher percentages of band neutrophils and lower percentages of segmented neutrophils. Functionally, Acomys and Mus neutrophils did not differ in their ability to migrate or produce reactive oxygen species, but Acomys neutrophils phagocytosed more fungal zymosan. Despite this enhanced phagocytosis activity, Acomys neutrophils were not more effective than Mus neutrophils at killing Escherichia coli. Interestingly, whole blood bacteria killing was dominated by serum in Acomys versus neutrophils only or neutrophils and serum in Mus, suggesting that Acomys primarily rely on serum to kill bacteria whereas Mus do not. These subtle differences in neutrophil traits may allow regeneration-competent species to offset damaging effects of inflammation without compromising pathogen defense.
哺乳动物的再生能力很罕见,但沙鼠(Acomys spp.)可以自然再生皮肤和耳孔。炎症被认为会抑制伤口愈合过程中的再生,但炎症的某些方面既有助于再生,也有助于抵御病原体。我们比较了未受伤的、具有再生能力的(Acomys:A. cahirinus、A. kempi、A. percivali)和无再生能力的(Mus musculus:瑞士韦伯斯特、野生种群)鼠类中性粒细胞的特征,以检验这些群体之间中性粒细胞数量和功能的先天差异。中性粒细胞数量在不同物种之间存在显著差异。在血液中,Acomys 循环中的中性粒细胞百分比低于 Mus;而在骨髓中,Acomys 的带型中性粒细胞百分比较高,分叶型中性粒细胞百分比较低。在功能上,Acomys 和 Mus 中性粒细胞在迁移或产生活性氧物种的能力上没有差异,但 Acomys 中性粒细胞吞噬真菌zymosan 的能力更强。尽管这种吞噬活性增强,但 Acomys 中性粒细胞在杀死大肠杆菌方面不如 Mus 中性粒细胞有效。有趣的是,在 Acomys 中,全血细菌杀伤主要由血清主导,而在 Mus 中,仅由中性粒细胞或中性粒细胞和血清主导,这表明 Acomys 主要依赖血清来杀死细菌,而 Mus 则不然。这些中性粒细胞特征的细微差异可能使具有再生能力的物种能够抵消炎症的破坏性影响,而不会损害病原体防御。