Okuda Paola Matiko Martins, Pangelinan Melissa, Capellini Simone A, Cogo-Moreira Hugo
Departamento de Psiquiatria e Psicologia Médica, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
School of Kinesiology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA.
Trends Psychiatry Psychother. 2019 Jan-Mar;41(1):51-59. doi: 10.1590/2237-6089-2018-0014. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
To evaluate the construct validity and model-based reliability of general and specific contributions of the subscales of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2 (MABC-2) and Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency-2 (BOT-2) when evaluating motor skills across a range of psychiatric disorders.
Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and bifactor analysis were conducted on BOT-2 data from 187 elementary school students (grades 1 to 6) (mean age: 113 ± 20 months; boys: n = 117, 62.56%) and on MABC-2 data from 127 elementary school students (grade 1) (mean age: 76 ± 2 months; boys: n = 58, 45.67%).
The results of the CFA fit the data for multidimensionality for the BOT-2 and presented poor fit indices for the MABC-2. For both tests, the bifactor model showed that the reliability of the subscales was poor.
The BOT-2 exhibited factorial validity with a multidimensional structure among the current samples, but the MABC-2 showed poor fit indices, insufficient to confirm its multidimensional structure. For both tests, most of the reliable variance came from a general motor factor (M-factor), therefore the scoring and reporting of subscale scores were not justified for both tests.
评估儿童运动评估量表第二版（MABC - 2）和布鲁宁克斯 - 奥西瑞斯基运动技能测试第二版（BOT - 2）的分量表在评估一系列精神疾病患者的运动技能时的结构效度和基于模型的信度。
对187名小学生（1至6年级）（平均年龄：113±20个月；男孩：n = 117，62.56%）的BOT - 2数据以及127名一年级小学生（平均年龄：76±2个月；男孩：n = 58，45.67%）的MABC - 2数据进行验证性因素分析（CFA）和双因素分析。
CFA结果显示BOT - 2数据符合多维性，但MABC - 2的拟合指数较差。对于这两项测试，双因素模型表明分量表的信度较差。
BOT - 2在当前样本中呈现出具有多维结构的因素效度，但MABC - 2的拟合指数较差，不足以确认其多维结构。对于这两项测试，大部分可靠方差来自一般运动因素（M因素），因此这两项测试的分量表得分的计分和报告都不合理。
