• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较用于儿童的运动评估量表与布鲁因inks - 奥塞瑞斯基运动技能测验在患精神分裂症和未患精神分裂症青少年中的应用。

Comparing the Movement Assessment Battery for Children with the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency in adolescents with and without schizophrenia.

作者信息

Byrial Pernille, Clausen Loa, Nyboe Lene

机构信息

Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark.

Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus N, Denmark.

出版信息

Physiother Res Int. 2023 Apr;28(2):e1980. doi: 10.1002/pri.1980. Epub 2022 Nov 9.

DOI:10.1002/pri.1980
PMID:36349933
Abstract

BACKGROUND

As motor impairments have implications for health and functioning, they need to be addressed early, not only in childhood but also in adolescence, the period in which mental disorders as schizophrenia, typically develops. Further, the possible prognostic value of motor impairments in schizophrenia highlights the importance. The Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency (BOT-2) and the Movement Assessment Battery for Children (MABC-2) assess adolescent motor performance. However, MABC-2 is not valid past age 16 and has no sex-norms. Further, while the concurrent validity between the tests and their ability to distinguish between clinical and non-clinical groups has been established in children, however they have not been established in adolescence.

PURPOSE

To compare the ability of MABC-2 and BOT-2 to distinguish between adolescents with and without schizophrenia, to examine the concurrent validity between tests, to examine the agreement between tests in classifying adolescents "at risk" or scoring "below average" and to examine the influence of age and sex on MABC-2.

METHOD

Motor performance assessed by BOT-2 and MABC-2 was compared in 25 adolescents with schizophrenia (14-18) and age- and sex-matched controls using t-test, Cohen's D and false discovery rate's q-value. The associations between tests were assessed using Pearson's correlation and Lin's concordance correlation coefficient. The Kappa coefficient was used to assess the agreement between tests in classifying "risk/below average" and linear regression was adopted to assess the influence of age/sex on MABC-2.

RESULTS

MABC-2 and BOT-2 significantly distinguished adolescents with schizophrenia from controls with large effect size. A strong association (p > 0.001) was found between the tests. The tests revealed moderate agreement in identifying "risk" or scoring "below average". Only sex influenced MABC-2 scores.

CONCLUSION

MABC-2 and BOT-2 are both useful for assessing motor performance and distinguishing between adolescents with and without schizophrenia, although BOT-2 provides a more detailed picture of the challenges in adolescent with schizophrenia.

摘要

背景

由于运动障碍会影响健康和功能,因此需要尽早解决,不仅在儿童期,而且在青少年期,精神分裂症等精神障碍通常在这一时期发病。此外,运动障碍在精神分裂症中的可能预后价值凸显了其重要性。布鲁因inks - 奥塞雷茨基运动能力测试(BOT - 2)和儿童运动评估量表(MABC - 2)用于评估青少年的运动表现。然而,MABC - 2在16岁以后无效且没有性别常模。此外,虽然在儿童中已经确立了这些测试之间的同时效度以及它们区分临床组和非临床组的能力,但在青少年中尚未确立。

目的

比较MABC - 2和BOT - 2区分有精神分裂症和无精神分裂症青少年的能力,检验测试之间的同时效度,检验测试在对“有风险”青少年进行分类或“低于平均水平”评分方面的一致性,并检验年龄和性别对MABC - 2的影响。

方法

使用t检验、科恩d值和错误发现率的q值,比较25名患有精神分裂症的青少年(14 - 18岁)以及年龄和性别匹配的对照组通过BOT - 2和MABC - 2评估的运动表现。使用皮尔逊相关系数和林氏一致性相关系数评估测试之间的关联。kappa系数用于评估测试在分类“风险/低于平均水平”方面的一致性,采用线性回归评估年龄/性别对MABC - 2的影响。

结果

MABC - 2和BOT - 2显著区分了患有精神分裂症的青少年和对照组,效应量较大。测试之间发现了很强的关联(p > 0.001)。测试在识别“风险”或评分“低于平均水平”方面显示出中等一致性。只有性别影响MABC - 2得分。

结论

MABC - 2和BOT - 2都有助于评估运动表现并区分有精神分裂症和无精神分裂症的青少年,尽管BOT - 2能更详细地呈现患有精神分裂症青少年所面临的挑战。

相似文献

1
Comparing the Movement Assessment Battery for Children with the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency in adolescents with and without schizophrenia.比较用于儿童的运动评估量表与布鲁因inks - 奥塞瑞斯基运动技能测验在患精神分裂症和未患精神分裂症青少年中的应用。
Physiother Res Int. 2023 Apr;28(2):e1980. doi: 10.1002/pri.1980. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
2
Convergent validity of two motor skill tests used to assess school-age children.用于评估学龄儿童的两项运动技能测试的收敛效度。
Scand J Occup Ther. 2015 May;22(3):161-72. doi: 10.3109/11038128.2014.969308. Epub 2014 Oct 20.
3
Exploring Cultural Bias in Two Different Motor Competence Test Batteries When Used in African Children.探索两种不同运动能力测试组合在用于非洲儿童时的文化偏见。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 1;19(11):6788. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116788.
4
Motor skills assessments: support for a general motor factor for the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2 and the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency-2.运动技能评估:对儿童运动评估量表第二版(Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2)和布吕尼inks-奥泽斯基运动熟练度测试第二版(Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency-2)的一般运动因素的支持。
Trends Psychiatry Psychother. 2019 Jan-Mar;41(1):51-59. doi: 10.1590/2237-6089-2018-0014. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
5
Ecological validity of the German Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency - 2nd Edition.德国布鲁因inks - 奥塞列茨基运动能力测验第二版的生态效度
Hum Mov Sci. 2017 Jun;53:45-54. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2016.10.005. Epub 2016 Nov 7.
6
Comparing a parent-report and a performance-based measure of children's motor skill abilities: are they associated?比较基于家长报告和基于表现的儿童运动技能能力测量方法:它们之间有关联吗?
Occup Ther Health Care. 2014 Oct;28(4):371-81. doi: 10.3109/07380577.2014.933381. Epub 2014 Jul 22.
7
Movement difficulties in children with ADHD: Comparing the long- and short-form Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency-Second Edition (BOT-2).儿童注意缺陷多动障碍的运动困难:比较长式和短式布鲁金斯-奥塞尔斯基运动技能测试第二版(BOT-2)。
Aust Occup Ther J. 2020 Apr;67(2):153-161. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12641. Epub 2020 Jan 16.
8
Psychometric properties of gross motor assessment tools for children: a systematic review.儿童粗大运动评估工具的心理测量特性:一项系统综述
BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 27;8(10):e021734. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021734.
9
Do We Drop the Ball When We Measure Ball Skills Using Standardized Motor Performance Tests?当我们使用标准化运动表现测试来衡量球类技能时,我们是否失职了?
Children (Basel). 2022 Mar 6;9(3):367. doi: 10.3390/children9030367.
10
Top-down and bottom-up approaches to motor skill assessment of children: are child-report and parent-report perceptions predictive of children's performance-based assessment results?儿童运动技能评估的自上而下和自下而上方法:儿童报告和家长报告的认知能否预测基于儿童表现的评估结果?
Scand J Occup Ther. 2013 Jan;20(1):45-53. doi: 10.3109/11038128.2012.693944. Epub 2012 May 31.