Intensive Care Unit and Postgraduate Program, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.
Research Institute, HCor-Hospital do Coração, São Paulo, Brazil.
Crit Care. 2019 Jan 29;23(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2323-y.
Although light sedation levels are associated with several beneficial outcomes for critically ill patients on mechanical ventilation, the majority of patients are still deeply sedated. Organizational factors may play a role on adherence to light sedation levels. We aimed to identify organizational factors associated with a moderate to light sedation target on the first 48 h of mechanical ventilation, as well as the association between early achievement of within-target sedation and mortality.
This study is a secondary analysis of a multicenter two-phase study (prospective cohort followed by a cluster-randomized controlled trial) performed in 118 Brazilian ICUs. We included all critically ill patients who were on mechanical ventilation 48 h after ICU admission. A moderate to light level of sedation or being alert and calm (i.e., the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale of - 3 to 0) was the target for all patients on mechanical ventilation during the study period. We collected data on the type of hospital (public, private, profit and private, nonprofit), hospital teaching status, nursing and physician staffing, and presence of sedation, analgesia, and weaning protocols. We used multivariate random-effects regression with ICU and study phase as random-effects and correction for patients' Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment. We also performed a mediation analysis to explore whether sedation level was just a mediator of the association between organizational factors and mortality.
We included 5719 patients. Only 1710 (29.9%) were on target sedation levels on day 2. Board-certified intensivists on the morning and afternoon shifts were associated with an adequate sedation level on day 2 (OR = 2.43; CI 95%, 1.09-5.38). Target sedation levels were associated with reduced hospital mortality (OR = 0.63; CI 95%, 0.55-0.72). Mediation analysis also suggested such an association, but did not suggest a relationship between the physician staffing model and hospital mortality.
Board-certified intensivists on morning and afternoon shifts were associated with an increased number of patients achieving lighter sedation goals. These findings reinforce the importance of organizational factors, such as intensivists' presence, as a modifiable quality improvement target.
尽管轻度镇静水平与机械通气危重症患者的多项有益结果相关,但大多数患者仍处于深度镇静状态。组织因素可能对达到轻度镇静水平产生影响。我们旨在确定与机械通气前 48 小时内中度至轻度镇静目标相关的组织因素,以及早期达到目标镇静水平与死亡率之间的关联。
这是一项多中心两阶段研究(前瞻性队列研究后为聚类随机对照试验)的二次分析,在巴西 118 家 ICU 中进行。我们纳入了 ICU 入住后 48 小时内使用机械通气的所有危重症患者。所有机械通气患者的镇静目标为中度至轻度镇静或清醒镇静(即 Richmond 躁动-镇静量表评分为-3 至 0)。我们收集了医院类型(公立、私立、盈利性和非营利性)、医院教学状态、护理和医生人员配备,以及镇静、镇痛和撤机方案的相关数据。我们使用多变量随机效应回归模型,将 ICU 和研究阶段作为随机效应,并校正患者的简化急性生理学评分 3 和序贯器官衰竭评估。我们还进行了中介分析,以探讨镇静水平是否仅仅是组织因素与死亡率之间关联的中介因素。
我们纳入了 5719 名患者。仅有 1710 名(29.9%)患者在第 2 天达到目标镇静水平。上午和下午轮班的有资质的重症监护医师与第 2 天达到适当镇静水平相关(OR=2.43;95%CI,1.09-5.38)。达到目标镇静水平与降低医院死亡率相关(OR=0.63;95%CI,0.55-0.72)。中介分析也提示存在这种关联,但并未提示医生人员配备模式与医院死亡率之间存在关联。
上午和下午轮班的有资质的重症监护医师与达到更轻镇静目标的患者数量增加相关。这些发现强调了组织因素(如重症监护医师的存在)作为可改变的质量改进目标的重要性。