• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肾移植和肝移植受者基于网络的患者门户网站使用情况中的种族、民族和社会经济差异:横断面研究

Racial, Ethnic, and Socioeconomic Disparities in Web-Based Patient Portal Usage Among Kidney and Liver Transplant Recipients: Cross-Sectional Study.

作者信息

Wedd Joel, Basu Mohua, Curtis Laura M, Smith Kayla, Lo Denise J, Serper Marina, Wolf Michael S, Parker Ruth, Patzer Rachel E

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.

Emory Transplant Center, Atlanta, GA, United States.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2019 Apr 22;21(4):e11864. doi: 10.2196/11864.

DOI:10.2196/11864
PMID:31008707
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6658258/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Kidney and liver transplant recipients must manage a complex care regimen after kidney transplant. Although the use of Web-based patient portals is known to improve patient-provider communication and health outcomes in chronic disease populations by helping patients manage posttransplant care, disparities in access to and use of portals have been reported. Little is known about portal usage and disparities among kidney and liver transplant recipients.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to examine patient racial/ethnic, socioeconomic, and clinical characteristics associated with portal usage among kidney and liver transplant recipients.

METHODS

The study included all adult kidney and liver transplant recipients (n=710) at a large academic transplant center in the Southeastern United States between March 2014 and November 2016. Electronic medical record data were linked with Cerner portal usage data. Patient portal use was defined as any portal activity (vs no activity) recorded in the Cerner Web-based portal, including viewing of health records, lab results, medication lists, and the use of secure messaging. Multivariable log-binomial regression was used to determine the patient demographic, clinical, and socioeconomic characteristics associated with portal usage, stratified by organ.

RESULTS

Among 710 transplant recipients (n=455 kidney, n=255 liver), 55.4% (252/455) of kidney recipients and 48.2% (123/255) of liver recipients used the patient portal. Black patients were less likely to use the portal versus white patients among both kidney (57% black vs 74% white) and liver (28% black vs 55% white) transplant recipients. In adjusted multivariable analyses, kidney transplant recipients were more likely to use the portal if they had higher education; among liver recipients, patients who were white versus black and had higher education were more likely to use the portal.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite studies showing that patient portals have the potential to benefit transplant recipients as a tool for health management, racial and socioeconomic disparities should be considered before widespread implementation. Transplant centers should include portal training and support to all patients to encourage use, given its potential to improve outcomes.

摘要

背景

肾移植和肝移植受者在肾移植后必须管理复杂的护理方案。虽然已知使用基于网络的患者门户通过帮助患者管理移植后护理来改善慢性病患者群体中的医患沟通和健康结局,但有关门户访问和使用方面的差异已有报道。关于肾移植和肝移植受者中门户使用情况及差异知之甚少。

目的

本研究的目的是检查肾移植和肝移植受者中与门户使用相关的患者种族/族裔、社会经济和临床特征。

方法

该研究纳入了2014年3月至2016年11月期间美国东南部一家大型学术移植中心的所有成年肾移植和肝移植受者(n = 710)。电子病历数据与Cerner门户使用数据相关联。患者门户使用被定义为Cerner基于网络的门户中记录的任何门户活动(与无活动相对),包括查看健康记录、实验室结果、用药清单以及使用安全消息传递。多变量对数二项回归用于确定与门户使用相关的患者人口统计学、临床和社会经济特征,并按器官分层。

结果

在710名移植受者中(n = 肾移植455例,n = 肝移植255例),55.4%(252/455)的肾移植受者和48.2%(123/255)的肝移植受者使用了患者门户。在肾移植(黑人57% 对白人74%)和肝移植(黑人28% 对白人55%)受者中黑人患者使用门户的可能性低于白人患者。在调整后的多变量分析中,肾移植受者如果受教育程度较高则更有可能使用门户;在肝移植受者中,白人患者比黑人患者且受教育程度较高者更有可能使用门户。

结论

尽管研究表明患者门户作为健康管理工具有可能使移植受者受益,但在广泛实施之前应考虑种族和社会经济差异。鉴于患者门户有改善结局的潜力,移植中心应向所有患者提供门户培训和支持以鼓励使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f412/6658258/96683f50f929/jmir_v21i4e11864_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f412/6658258/8c6ad796e937/jmir_v21i4e11864_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f412/6658258/96683f50f929/jmir_v21i4e11864_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f412/6658258/8c6ad796e937/jmir_v21i4e11864_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f412/6658258/96683f50f929/jmir_v21i4e11864_fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Racial, Ethnic, and Socioeconomic Disparities in Web-Based Patient Portal Usage Among Kidney and Liver Transplant Recipients: Cross-Sectional Study.肾移植和肝移植受者基于网络的患者门户网站使用情况中的种族、民族和社会经济差异:横断面研究
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Apr 22;21(4):e11864. doi: 10.2196/11864.
2
Disparities in Electronic Patient Portal Use in Prenatal Care: Retrospective Cohort Study.产前护理中电子患者门户使用情况的差异:回顾性队列研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Sep 23;21(9):e14445. doi: 10.2196/14445.
3
eHealth literacy and web-based patient portal usage among kidney and liver transplant recipients.电子健康素养与肾和肝移植受者的基于网络的患者门户使用情况。
Clin Transplant. 2021 Feb;35(2):e14184. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14184. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
4
Electronic Patient Portal Use After Kidney Transplant: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.电子患者门户在肾移植后的使用:一项单中心回顾性研究。
J Surg Res. 2023 Apr;284:252-263. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.11.043. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
5
Racial and ethnic disparities in access to and utilization of living donor liver transplants.活体供肝移植在获取和利用方面的种族和民族差异。
Liver Transpl. 2015 Jul;21(7):904-13. doi: 10.1002/lt.24147. Epub 2015 Jun 9.
6
Advance Care Planning and Palliative Care Consultation in Kidney Transplantation.肾移植中的预先护理计划与姑息治疗咨询
Am J Kidney Dis. 2024 Mar;83(3):318-328. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2023.07.018. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
7
Patient- and Provider-Level Factors Associated with Patient Portal Usage Among Medicaid Recipients.患者和提供者层面与医疗补助受助人使用患者门户相关的因素。
Telemed J E Health. 2024 Sep;30(9):2466-2476. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2024.0194. Epub 2024 Jun 28.
8
Differences in Access to and Preferences for Using Patient Portals and Other eHealth Technologies Based on Race, Ethnicity, and Age: A Database and Survey Study of Seniors in a Large Health Plan.基于种族、族裔和年龄的患者门户网站及其他电子健康技术的使用机会和偏好差异:一项针对大型健康计划中老年人的数据库及调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Mar 4;18(3):e50. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5105.
9
Evaluation of Community-Level Vulnerability and Racial Disparities in Living Donor Kidney Transplant.社区层面的脆弱性评估及活体供肾移植中的种族差异
JAMA Surg. 2021 Dec 1;156(12):1120-1129. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.4410.
10
Association of Race and Ethnicity With Live Donor Kidney Transplantation in the United States From 1995 to 2014.1995年至2014年美国种族与活体供肾移植的关联
JAMA. 2018 Jan 2;319(1):49-61. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.19152.

引用本文的文献

1
Sociodemographic and Socioeconomic Determinants for the Usage of Digital Patient Portals in Hospitals: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Digital Divide.医院数字患者门户网站使用情况的社会人口学和社会经济决定因素:关于数字鸿沟的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 3;27:e68091. doi: 10.2196/68091.
2
Examining Whether Patient Portal and Video Visit Use Differs by Race and Ethnicity Among Older Adults in a US Integrated Health Care Delivery System: Cross-Sectional Electronic Health Record and Survey-Based Study.考察在美国一体化医疗服务提供系统中,老年患者使用患者门户和视频访问的情况是否因种族和民族而异:基于电子健康记录和调查的横断面研究。
JMIR Aging. 2024 Nov 7;7:e63814. doi: 10.2196/63814.
3

本文引用的文献

1
OPTN/SRTR 2016 Annual Data Report: Kidney.OPTN/SRTR 2016 年度数据报告:肾脏。
Am J Transplant. 2018 Jan;18 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):18-113. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14557.
2
Transitions of care: Medication-related barriers identified by low socioeconomic patients of a federally qualified health center following hospital discharge.过渡期护理:一家联邦合格健康中心的低社会经济地位患者在出院后确定的与药物相关的障碍。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2018 Jan;14(1):26-30. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2016.12.007. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
3
OPTN/SRTR 2015 Annual Data Report: Liver.
Sociodemographic Factors Associated with the Utilization of Digital Health Technologies Among Informal Caregivers: A Nationwide Study in the USA, 2022.
美国非正式护理人员使用数字健康技术的社会人口学因素:2022年全国性研究
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024 Oct 28. doi: 10.1007/s40615-024-02219-2.
4
Self-Management Using eHealth Technologies for Liver Transplant Recipients: Scoping Review.使用电子健康技术进行肝移植受者自我管理:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jul 4;26:e56664. doi: 10.2196/56664.
5
A novel approach to patient portal activation data to power equity improvements.一种新颖的患者门户激活数据方法,可助力提升公平性。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Nov 1;31(11):2708-2715. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae152.
6
Patient Portal Use and Risk of Readmissions in Decompensated Cirrhosis: Retrospective Study.失代偿期肝硬化患者使用患者门户网站与再入院风险:回顾性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Dec 19;7:e47080. doi: 10.2196/47080.
7
Belatacept with time-limited tacrolimus coimmunosuppression modifies the 3-year risk of eplet mismatch in kidney transplantation.贝伐珠单抗联合限时他克莫司免疫抑制可改变肾移植 3 年内供者特异性抗体错配的风险。
Am J Transplant. 2024 Feb;24(2):260-270. doi: 10.1016/j.ajt.2023.09.011. Epub 2023 Sep 29.
8
Design and evaluation of an educational mobile program for liver transplant patients.肝移植患者教育移动程序的设计与评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Sep 9;23(1):974. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09989-1.
9
Assessing Equitable Recruitment in a Digital Health Trial for Asthma.评估哮喘数字健康试验中的公平招募
Appl Clin Inform. 2023 Aug;14(4):620-631. doi: 10.1055/a-2090-5745. Epub 2023 May 10.
10
A Multi-Level Analysis of Individual and Neighborhood Factors Associated with Patient Portal Use among Adult Emergency Department Patients with Multimorbidity.多水平分析个体和邻里因素与成年多病急诊患者使用患者门户的关联。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 10;20(2):1231. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021231.
器官获取与移植网络/器官共享联合网络2015年度数据报告:肝脏
Am J Transplant. 2017 Jan;17 Suppl 1:174-251. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14126.
4
Prospective single-arm interventional pilot study to assess a smartphone-based system for measuring and supporting adherence to medication.一项前瞻性单臂干预性试点研究,旨在评估一种基于智能手机的用于测量和支持药物依从性的系统。
BMJ Open. 2016 Dec 20;6(12):e014194. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014194.
5
The use of mobile applications to support self-management for people with asthma: a systematic review of controlled studies to identify features associated with clinical effectiveness and adherence.使用移动应用程序支持哮喘患者的自我管理:对对照研究的系统评价,以确定与临床疗效和依从性相关的特征。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 May 1;24(3):619-632. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw143.
6
A mobile application improves therapy-adherence rates in elderly patients undergoing rehabilitation: A crossover design study comparing documentation via iPad with paper-based control.一款移动应用程序提高了老年康复患者的治疗依从率:一项交叉设计研究,比较通过iPad记录与纸质对照记录的情况。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Sep;95(36):e4446. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004446.
7
Kidney transplant recipients' attitudes about using mobile health technology for managing and monitoring medication therapy.肾移植受者对于使用移动健康技术管理和监测药物治疗的态度。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2016 Jul-Aug;56(4):450-454.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2016.03.017.
8
Medication understanding, non-adherence, and clinical outcomes among adult kidney transplant recipients.成年肾移植受者的用药理解、依从性及临床结局
Clin Transplant. 2016 Oct;30(10):1294-1305. doi: 10.1111/ctr.12821. Epub 2016 Aug 29.
9
What do we know about mobile applications for diabetes self-management? A review of reviews.我们对用于糖尿病自我管理的移动应用程序了解多少?综述的综述。
J Behav Med. 2016 Dec;39(6):981-994. doi: 10.1007/s10865-016-9765-3. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
10
Immunosuppressive Medication Adherence in Liver Transplant Recipients.肝移植受者的免疫抑制药物依从性
Transplant Proc. 2016 May;48(4):1198-201. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.12.097.