• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种耐盐性不同芝麻基因型对盐胁迫响应的比较蛋白质组学分析。

Comparative proteomic analysis of two sesame genotypes with contrasting salinity tolerance in response to salt stress.

机构信息

Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Oil Crops, Ministry of Agriculture, Oil Crops Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan 430062, China; Cotton Research Center, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan 250100, China.

Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Oil Crops, Ministry of Agriculture, Oil Crops Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan 430062, China.

出版信息

J Proteomics. 2019 Jun 15;201:73-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2019.04.017. Epub 2019 Apr 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.jprot.2019.04.017
PMID:31009803
Abstract

Sesame is one of the most important oilseed crops and has high nutritional value. The yield and quality of sesame are severely affected by high salinity in coastal and semi-arid/arid regions. In this study, the phenotypic, physiological, and proteomic changes induced by salt treatment were analyzed in salt-tolerant (G441) and salt-sensitive (G358) seedlings. Phenotypic and physiological results indicated that G441 had an enhanced capacity to withstand salinity stress compared to G358. Proteomic analysis revealed a strong induction of salt-responsive protein species in sesame, mainly related to catalytic, hydrolase, oxidoreductase, and binding activities. Pathway enrichment analysis showed that more salt-responsive proteins in G441 were involved in tyrosine metabolism, carbon fixation in photosynthetic organisms, carbon metabolism, alpha-linolenic acid metabolism, biosynthesis of amino acids, photosynthesis, and glutathione metabolism. Furthermore, G441 displayed unique differentially accumulated proteins in seedlings functioning as heat shock proteins, abscisic acid receptor PYL2-like, calcium-dependent protein kinases, serine/threonine-protein phosphatases, nucleoredoxin, and antioxidant enzymes. Quantitative real-time PCR analysis revealed that some of the proteins were also regulated by salinity stress at the transcript level. Our findings provide important information on salinity responses in plants and may constitute useful resources for enhancing salinity tolerance in sesame. SIGNIFICANCE: Our study identified potential biological pathways and salt-responsive protein species related to transducing stress signals and scavenging reactive oxygen species under salt stress. These findings will provide possible participants/pathways/proteins that contribute to salt tolerance and may serve as the basis for improving salinity tolerance in sesame and other plants.

摘要

芝麻是最重要的油料作物之一,具有很高的营养价值。在沿海和半干旱/干旱地区,高盐度严重影响芝麻的产量和品质。本研究分析了耐盐(G441)和盐敏感(G358)幼苗在盐处理下的表型、生理和蛋白质组变化。表型和生理结果表明,G441 比 G358 具有更强的耐盐能力。蛋白质组分析显示,芝麻中强烈诱导了盐响应蛋白,主要与催化、水解酶、氧化还原酶和结合活性有关。途径富集分析表明,G441 中更多的盐响应蛋白参与了酪氨酸代谢、光合生物中的碳固定、碳代谢、α-亚麻酸代谢、氨基酸生物合成、光合作用和谷胱甘肽代谢。此外,G441 在幼苗中表现出独特的差异积累蛋白,这些蛋白作为热休克蛋白、ABA 受体 PYL2 样、钙依赖性蛋白激酶、丝氨酸/苏氨酸蛋白磷酸酶、核还原酶和抗氧化酶发挥作用。定量实时 PCR 分析显示,一些蛋白质在转录水平也受到盐胁迫的调节。我们的研究结果提供了植物对盐胁迫反应的重要信息,可能为提高芝麻的耐盐性提供有用的资源。意义:本研究鉴定了与在盐胁迫下传递胁迫信号和清除活性氧有关的潜在生物学途径和盐响应蛋白种类。这些发现将为耐盐性提供可能的参与者/途径/蛋白,并可能为提高芝麻和其他植物的耐盐性提供基础。

相似文献

1
Comparative proteomic analysis of two sesame genotypes with contrasting salinity tolerance in response to salt stress.两种耐盐性不同芝麻基因型对盐胁迫响应的比较蛋白质组学分析。
J Proteomics. 2019 Jun 15;201:73-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2019.04.017. Epub 2019 Apr 19.
2
Transcriptome and metabolome analyses of two contrasting sesame genotypes reveal the crucial biological pathways involved in rapid adaptive response to salt stress.两种差异显著的芝麻基因型的转录组和代谢组分析揭示了其快速适应盐胁迫的关键生物学途径。
BMC Plant Biol. 2019 Feb 11;19(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12870-019-1665-6.
3
Comparative Physiological and Proteomic Analysis of Two Sugar Beet Genotypes with Contrasting Salt Tolerance.两种耐盐性不同的甜菜基因型的比较生理和蛋白质组学分析。
J Agric Food Chem. 2019 May 29;67(21):6056-6073. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.9b00244. Epub 2019 May 16.
4
Comparative proteomics and gene expression analyses revealed responsive proteins and mechanisms for salt tolerance in chickpea genotypes.比较蛋白质组学和基因表达分析揭示了鹰嘴豆基因型耐盐的响应蛋白和机制。
BMC Plant Biol. 2019 Jul 9;19(1):300. doi: 10.1186/s12870-019-1793-z.
5
Comparative Proteomic Analysis Reveals the Regulatory Effects of HS on Salt Tolerance of Mangrove Plant .比较蛋白质组学分析揭示 HS 对红树植物耐盐性的调控作用。
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Dec 23;21(1):118. doi: 10.3390/ijms21010118.
6
Transcriptomic, biochemical and physio-anatomical investigations shed more light on responses to drought stress in two contrasting sesame genotypes.转录组学、生物化学和生理解剖学研究更深入地揭示了两个不同芝麻基因型对干旱胁迫的响应。
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 18;7(1):8755. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-09397-6.
7
Physiological and proteomic characterization of salt tolerance in a mangrove plant, Bruguiera gymnorrhiza (L.) Lam.盐生红树植物白骨壤(Bruguiera gymnorrhiza(L.)Lam.)耐盐的生理和蛋白质组学特性研究
Tree Physiol. 2012 Nov;32(11):1378-88. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tps097. Epub 2012 Oct 25.
8
A collection of transcriptomic and proteomic datasets from sesame in response to salt stress.一组来自芝麻响应盐胁迫的转录组和蛋白质组数据集。
Data Brief. 2020 Jul 31;32:106096. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.106096. eCollection 2020 Oct.
9
Transcriptome analysis and differential gene expression profiling of two contrasting quinoa genotypes in response to salt stress.转录组分析和两种耐盐性差异较大的藜麦基因型对盐胁迫的差异基因表达谱分析。
BMC Plant Biol. 2020 Dec 30;20(1):568. doi: 10.1186/s12870-020-02753-1.
10
Comparative proteomic analysis of salt-responsive proteins in canola roots by 2-DE and MALDI-TOF MS.利用 2-DE 和 MALDI-TOF MS 技术对油菜根中盐响应蛋白进行比较蛋白质组学分析。
Biochim Biophys Acta Proteins Proteom. 2019 Mar;1867(3):227-236. doi: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2018.12.009. Epub 2019 Jan 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Mapping proteomic response to salinity stress tolerance in oil crops: Towards enhanced plant resilience.绘制油料作物对盐胁迫耐受性的蛋白质组学反应图谱:迈向增强植物抗逆性
J Genet Eng Biotechnol. 2024 Dec;22(4):100432. doi: 10.1016/j.jgeb.2024.100432. Epub 2024 Oct 30.
2
Photosynthetic machinery under salinity stress: Trepidations and adaptive mechanisms.盐胁迫下的光合机制:担忧与适应机制
Photosynthetica. 2023 Mar 14;61(1):73-93. doi: 10.32615/ps.2023.002. eCollection 2023.
3
Comparative proteomic and metabolomic analyses reveal stress responses of hemp to salinity.
比较蛋白质组学和代谢组学分析揭示了大麻对盐胁迫的应激反应。
Plant Cell Rep. 2024 May 29;43(6):154. doi: 10.1007/s00299-024-03237-4.
4
Transcriptome Profiling Reveals Molecular Responses to Salt Stress in Common Vetch ( L.).转录组分析揭示了普通野豌豆(Vicia sativa L.)对盐胁迫的分子响应。
Plants (Basel). 2024 Mar 3;13(5):714. doi: 10.3390/plants13050714.
5
Responsive Alternative Splicing Events of Species against Salt Stress.物种对盐胁迫的响应性可变剪接事件
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Jan 19;25(2):1227. doi: 10.3390/ijms25021227.
6
Investigation of the response of Platycodongrandiflorus (Jacq.) A. DC to salt stress using combined transcriptomics and metabolomics.利用联合转录组学和代谢组学研究桔梗(Jacq.)A. DC 对盐胁迫的响应。
BMC Plant Biol. 2023 Nov 25;23(1):589. doi: 10.1186/s12870-023-04536-w.
7
VmPacC-mediated pH regulation of Valsa mali confers to host acidification identified by comparative proteomics analysis.通过比较蛋白质组学分析确定,VmPacC介导的苹果黑腐皮壳菌pH调节赋予宿主酸化作用。
Stress Biol. 2023 Jun 21;3(1):18. doi: 10.1007/s44154-023-00097-y.
8
Comparative transcriptome responses of leaf and root tissues to salt stress in wheat strains with different salinity tolerances.不同耐盐性小麦品系叶片和根系组织对盐胁迫的比较转录组反应
Front Genet. 2023 Feb 23;14:1015599. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1015599. eCollection 2023.
9
Current Progress, Applications and Challenges of Multi-Omics Approaches in Sesame Genetic Improvement.芝麻遗传改良中多组学方法的研究进展、应用及挑战
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Feb 4;24(4):3105. doi: 10.3390/ijms24043105.
10
Proteomics approach to investigating osmotic stress effects on pistachio.蛋白质组学方法研究渗透胁迫对阿月浑子的影响。
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Jan 25;13:1041649. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1041649. eCollection 2022.