Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Surrey, GU2 7XH, UK.
Surrey Sleep Research Centre, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, GU2 7XP, UK.
Curr Biol. 2019 Apr 22;29(8):R278-R279. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.03.014.
Adequate synchronisation of endogenous circadian rhythms to external time is beneficial for human health [1]. But how circadian time (biological time) and the numbers on the clock (clock time) are related is tricky to understand, as many of us experience when we change from standard time (ST) to daylight saving time (DST), and during jet-lag. How confused we can be is also exemplified by two bills currently making their way through the California state legislature. Senate Bill SB-328 Pupil Attendance: School Start Time [2] prohibits middle and high schools from starting earlier than 8:30 in the morning. Senate Bill AB-807 Daylight Saving Time [3] would result in a switch to permanent DST. Similar debates on school start times and DST are happening throughout North America and Europe. Here we explain why a switch to permanent DST could negate any beneficial effects of delaying school start times.
内源性生物钟与外部时间同步是有益的[1]。但是,生物钟(生物时间)和时钟上的数字(时钟时间)之间的关系很难理解,当我们从标准时间(ST)切换到夏令时(DST)时,以及在倒时差时,我们很多人都会经历这种情况。加州州立法机构正在审议的两项法案也说明了我们可能会感到多么困惑。参议院法案 SB-328 学生出勤:上学时间[2]禁止中学和高中在早上 8:30 之前开始上课。参议院法案 AB-807 夏令时[3]将导致永久 DST 的转换。北美和欧洲各地都在就学校开始时间和夏令时进行类似的辩论。在这里,我们解释一下为什么切换到永久夏令时可能会抵消推迟上学时间的任何有益效果。