Suppr超能文献

夏令时:美国睡眠医学学会立场声明。

Daylight saving time: an American Academy of Sleep Medicine position statement.

作者信息

Rishi Muhammad Adeel, Ahmed Omer, Barrantes Perez Jairo H, Berneking Michael, Dombrowsky Joseph, Flynn-Evans Erin E, Santiago Vicente, Sullivan Shannon S, Upender Raghu, Yuen Kin, Abbasi-Feinberg Fariha, Aurora R Nisha, Carden Kelly A, Kirsch Douglas B, Kristo David A, Malhotra Raman K, Martin Jennifer L, Olson Eric J, Ramar Kannan, Rosen Carol L, Rowley James A, Shelgikar Anita V, Gurubhagavatula Indira

机构信息

Department of Pulmonology, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Eau Claire, Wisconsin.

Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York.

出版信息

J Clin Sleep Med. 2020 Oct 15;16(10):1781-1784. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.8780.

Abstract

The last several years have seen intense debate about the issue of transitioning between standard and daylight saving time. In the United States, the annual advance to daylight saving time in spring, and fall back to standard time in autumn, is required by law (although some exceptions are allowed under the statute). An abundance of accumulated evidence indicates that the acute transition from standard time to daylight saving time incurs significant public health and safety risks, including increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events, mood disorders, and motor vehicle crashes. Although chronic effects of remaining in daylight saving time year-round have not been well studied, daylight saving time is less aligned with human circadian biology-which, due to the impacts of the delayed natural light/dark cycle on human activity, could result in circadian misalignment, which has been associated in some studies with increased cardiovascular disease risk, metabolic syndrome and other health risks. It is, therefore, the position of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine that these seasonal time changes should be abolished in favor of a fixed, national, year-round standard time.

摘要

在过去几年里,关于标准时间和夏令时之间转换的问题一直存在激烈的争论。在美国,法律规定每年春天要提前到夏令时,秋天要恢复到标准时间(不过该法规允许一些例外情况)。大量积累的证据表明,从标准时间到夏令时的急剧转变会带来重大的公共健康和安全风险,包括心血管不良事件、情绪障碍和机动车事故风险增加。虽然全年保持夏令时的长期影响尚未得到充分研究,但夏令时与人类昼夜节律生物学的契合度较低——由于自然光/暗周期延迟对人类活动的影响,这可能导致昼夜节律失调,在一些研究中,这与心血管疾病风险增加、代谢综合征和其他健康风险有关。因此,美国睡眠医学学会的立场是,应该废除这些季节性的时间变化,转而采用固定的、全国性的、全年的标准时间。

相似文献

5
Taking to "heart" the proposed legislation for permanent daylight saving time.支持永久夏令时的立法。
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2022 Jul 1;323(1):H100-H102. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00218.2022. Epub 2022 May 27.
8
Daylight saving time transitions and road traffic accidents.夏令时转换与道路交通事。
J Environ Public Health. 2010;2010:657167. doi: 10.1155/2010/657167. Epub 2010 Jun 27.
9
A chronobiological evaluation of the risks of canceling daylight saving time.关于取消夏令时风险的生物节律学评估。
Chronobiol Int. 2022 Jan;39(1):1-4. doi: 10.1080/07420528.2021.1963760. Epub 2021 Aug 5.

引用本文的文献

7
Medical malpractice litigation and daylight saving time.医疗事故诉讼与夏令时。
J Clin Sleep Med. 2024 Jun 1;20(6):933-940. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.11038.
8
Daylight saving time and mortality-proceed with caution.夏令时与死亡率——谨慎行事。
Nat Commun. 2024 Feb 21;15(1):1576. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-45837-4.
10

本文引用的文献

4
Are Daylight Saving Time Changes Bad for the Brain?夏令时的变化对大脑有害吗?
JAMA Neurol. 2020 Jan 1;77(1):9-10. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.3780.
6
Why Should We Abolish Daylight Saving Time?我们为何要废除夏令时?
J Biol Rhythms. 2019 Jun;34(3):227-230. doi: 10.1177/0748730419854197.
10
Missed medical appointments during shifts to and from daylight saving time.在夏令时转换期间错过的医疗预约。
Chronobiol Int. 2018 Apr;35(4):584-588. doi: 10.1080/07420528.2017.1417313. Epub 2017 Dec 28.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验