• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较正交自然语言处理方法在前列腺癌患者临床表型和骨扫描利用评估中的应用。

Comparison of orthogonal NLP methods for clinical phenotyping and assessment of bone scan utilization among prostate cancer patients.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.

出版信息

J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jun;94:103184. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103184. Epub 2019 Apr 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103184
PMID:31014980
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6584041/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Clinical care guidelines recommend that newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients at high risk for metastatic spread receive a bone scan prior to treatment and that low risk patients not receive it. The objective was to develop an automated pipeline to interrogate heterogeneous data to evaluate the use of bone scans using a two different Natural Language Processing (NLP) approaches.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Our cohort was divided into risk groups based on Electronic Health Records (EHR). Information on bone scan utilization was identified in both structured data and free text from clinical notes. Our pipeline annotated sentences with a combination of a rule-based method using the ConText algorithm (a generalization of NegEx) and a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) method using word2vec to produce word embeddings.

RESULTS

A total of 5500 patients and 369,764 notes were included in the study. A total of 39% of patients were high-risk and 73% of these received a bone scan; of the 18% low risk patients, 10% received one. The accuracy of CNN model outperformed the rule-based model one (F-measure = 0.918 and 0.897 respectively). We demonstrate a combination of both models could maximize precision or recall, based on the study question.

CONCLUSION

Using structured data, we accurately classified patients' cancer risk group, identified bone scan documentation with two NLP methods, and evaluated guideline adherence. Our pipeline can be used to provide concrete feedback to clinicians and guide treatment decisions.

摘要

目的

临床护理指南建议,对有转移扩散高风险的新诊断前列腺癌患者,在治疗前进行骨扫描,而低风险患者则无需进行骨扫描。本研究旨在开发一个自动分析异构数据的管道,使用两种不同的自然语言处理(NLP)方法来评估骨扫描的使用情况。

材料与方法

我们的队列根据电子健康记录(EHR)分为风险组。骨扫描使用情况的信息是从临床记录的结构化数据和自由文本中识别出来的。我们的管道使用基于 ConText 算法(NegEx 的泛化)的规则方法和使用 word2vec 生成词向量的卷积神经网络(CNN)方法相结合,对句子进行注释。

结果

共纳入 5500 名患者和 369764 份病历。共有 39%的患者为高危,其中 73%的患者接受了骨扫描;18%的低危患者中,有 10%接受了骨扫描。CNN 模型的准确性优于基于规则的模型(F 度量分别为 0.918 和 0.897)。我们展示了可以根据研究问题,结合使用这两种模型来最大化精度或召回率。

结论

使用结构化数据,我们准确地对患者的癌症风险组进行分类,使用两种 NLP 方法识别骨扫描文档,并评估指南的依从性。我们的管道可以为临床医生提供具体的反馈,并指导治疗决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdf3/6584041/08eae93c2834/nihms-1527601-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdf3/6584041/5a66fdc06750/nihms-1527601-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdf3/6584041/e4f1f3ce8c4e/nihms-1527601-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdf3/6584041/17375552394e/nihms-1527601-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdf3/6584041/08eae93c2834/nihms-1527601-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdf3/6584041/5a66fdc06750/nihms-1527601-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdf3/6584041/e4f1f3ce8c4e/nihms-1527601-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdf3/6584041/17375552394e/nihms-1527601-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdf3/6584041/08eae93c2834/nihms-1527601-f0005.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of orthogonal NLP methods for clinical phenotyping and assessment of bone scan utilization among prostate cancer patients.比较正交自然语言处理方法在前列腺癌患者临床表型和骨扫描利用评估中的应用。
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jun;94:103184. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103184. Epub 2019 Apr 20.
2
Identification of patients' smoking status using an explainable AI approach: a Danish electronic health records case study.利用可解释 AI 方法识别患者的吸烟状况:丹麦电子健康记录案例研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 May 17;24(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02231-4.
3
Negation recognition in clinical natural language processing using a combination of the NegEx algorithm and a convolutional neural network.使用 NegEx 算法和卷积神经网络相结合的方法进行临床自然语言处理中的否定识别。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Oct 13;23(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02301-5.
4
Development of a generalizable natural language processing pipeline to extract physician-reported pain from clinical reports: Generated using publicly-available datasets and tested on institutional clinical reports for cancer patients with bone metastases.开发一种可推广的自然语言处理管道,从临床报告中提取医生报告的疼痛:使用公开可用的数据集生成,并在患有骨转移的癌症患者的机构临床报告上进行测试。
J Biomed Inform. 2021 Aug;120:103864. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2021.103864. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
5
An Automated Feature Engineering for Digital Rectal Examination Documentation using Natural Language Processing.一种使用自然语言处理技术对直肠指检文档进行自动特征工程的方法。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2018 Dec 5;2018:288-294. eCollection 2018.
6
Artificial Intelligence Learning Semantics via External Resources for Classifying Diagnosis Codes in Discharge Notes.人工智能通过外部资源学习语义以对出院小结中的诊断代码进行分类。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Nov 6;19(11):e380. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8344.
7
Identification of Preanesthetic History Elements by a Natural Language Processing Engine.基于自然语言处理引擎识别麻醉前病史元素。
Anesth Analg. 2022 Dec 1;135(6):1162-1171. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006152. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
8
Automatically identifying social isolation from clinical narratives for patients with prostate Cancer.自动识别前列腺癌患者临床叙述中的社会孤立现象。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Mar 14;19(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0795-y.
9
More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using F-PSMA PET/CT.使用F-PSMA PET/CT检测前列腺癌骨和软组织转移方面有更多优势。
Hell J Nucl Med. 2019 Jan-Apr;22(1):6-9. doi: 10.1967/s002449910952. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
10
Analytic Validation of the Automated Bone Scan Index as an Imaging Biomarker to Standardize Quantitative Changes in Bone Scans of Patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer.自动化骨扫描指数的分析验证:作为一种成像生物标志物,用于标准化转移性前列腺癌患者骨扫描的定量变化。
J Nucl Med. 2016 Jan;57(1):41-5. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.160085. Epub 2015 Aug 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Performance of Natural Language Processing for Information Extraction From Electronic Health Records Within Cancer: Systematic Review.自然语言处理在癌症电子健康记录信息提取中的性能:系统评价
JMIR Med Inform. 2025 Sep 12;13:e68707. doi: 10.2196/68707.
2
Clinical applications of large language models in medicine and surgery: A scoping review.大型语言模型在医学与外科中的临床应用:一项范围综述
J Int Med Res. 2025 Jul;53(7):3000605251347556. doi: 10.1177/03000605251347556. Epub 2025 Jul 4.
3
Applying Natural Language Processing to Textual Data From Clinical Data Warehouses: Systematic Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Advances in Electronic Phenotyping: From Rule-Based Definitions to Machine Learning Models.电子表型分析的进展:从基于规则的定义到机器学习模型
Annu Rev Biomed Data Sci. 2018 Jul;1:53-68. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-080917-013315. Epub 2018 May 23.
2
Using clinical Natural Language Processing for health outcomes research: Overview and actionable suggestions for future advances.使用临床自然语言处理进行健康结果研究:未来进展的概述和可行建议。
J Biomed Inform. 2018 Dec;88:11-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2018.10.005. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
3
Utilization of Prostate Cancer Quality Metrics for Research and Quality Improvement: A Structured Review.
将自然语言处理应用于临床数据仓库中的文本数据:系统评价。
JMIR Med Inform. 2023 Dec 15;11:e42477. doi: 10.2196/42477.
4
The Coming of Age of AI/ML in Drug Discovery, Development, Clinical Testing, and Manufacturing: The FDA Perspectives.人工智能/机器学习在药物发现、开发、临床测试和制造中的崭露头角:FDA 的观点。
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2023 Sep 6;17:2691-2725. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S424991. eCollection 2023.
5
A cross-institutional evaluation on breast cancer phenotyping NLP algorithms on electronic health records.一项关于电子健康记录中乳腺癌表型自然语言处理算法的跨机构评估。
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2023 Aug 22;22:32-40. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2023.08.018. eCollection 2023.
6
Assessment of Electronic Health Record for Cancer Research and Patient Care Through a Scoping Review of Cancer Natural Language Processing.通过癌症自然语言处理的范围综述评估癌症研究和患者护理的电子健康记录。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2022 Jul;6:e2200006. doi: 10.1200/CCI.22.00006.
7
Expanding the Secondary Use of Prostate Cancer Real World Data: Automated Classifiers for Clinical and Pathological Stage.拓展前列腺癌真实世界数据的二次利用:临床和病理分期的自动分类器
Front Digit Health. 2022 Jun 2;4:793316. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.793316. eCollection 2022.
8
Phenotyping severity of patient-centered outcomes using clinical notes: A prostate cancer use case.利用临床记录对以患者为中心的结局的严重程度进行表型分析:一个前列腺癌的应用案例。
Learn Health Syst. 2020 Jul 17;4(4):e10237. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10237. eCollection 2020 Oct.
9
Leveraging Digital Data to Inform and Improve Quality Cancer Care.利用数字数据为癌症优质护理提供信息并加以改善。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020 Apr;29(4):816-822. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-19-0873. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
前列腺癌质量指标在研究和质量改进中的应用:一项结构化综述。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2019 Mar;45(3):217-226. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2018.06.004. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
4
Architecture and Implementation of a Clinical Research Data Warehouse for Prostate Cancer.前列腺癌临床研究数据仓库的架构与实现
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2018 Jun 1;6(1):13. doi: 10.5334/egems.234.
5
A systematic study of the class imbalance problem in convolutional neural networks.卷积神经网络中类不平衡问题的系统研究。
Neural Netw. 2018 Oct;106:249-259. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2018.07.011. Epub 2018 Jul 29.
6
Opportunities and challenges in developing deep learning models using electronic health records data: a systematic review.利用电子健康记录数据开发深度学习模型的机遇与挑战:系统综述。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Oct 1;25(10):1419-1428. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocy068.
7
Quality of care and economic considerations of active surveillance of men with prostate cancer.前列腺癌男性主动监测的护理质量与经济考量
Transl Androl Urol. 2018 Apr;7(2):203-213. doi: 10.21037/tau.2017.08.08.
8
Secondary use of electronic medical records for clinical research: Challenges and Opportunities.电子病历在临床研究中的二次利用:挑战与机遇
Converg Sci Phys Oncol. 2018 Mar;4(1). doi: 10.1088/2057-1739/aaa905. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
9
The Research Implications of Prostate Specific Antigen Registry Errors: Data from the Veterans Health Administration.前列腺特异性抗原登记错误的研究意义:来自退伍军人健康管理局的数据。
J Urol. 2018 Sep;200(3):541-548. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.03.127. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
10
A clinician-centred programme for behaviour change in the optimal use of staging investigations for newly diagnosed prostate cancer.以临床医生为中心的方案,用于改变新诊断前列腺癌分期检查的最佳使用行为。
BJU Int. 2018 May;121 Suppl 3:22-27. doi: 10.1111/bju.14144. Epub 2018 Feb 16.