• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[2015 - 2017年荷兰精神科患者的安乐死情况]

[Euthanasia of Dutch psychiatric patients in 2015-2017].

作者信息

van Veen S M P, Weerheim F W, Mostert M, van Delden J J M

出版信息

Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2019;61(4):241-247.

PMID:31017282
Abstract

The Netherlands is one of the few countries in the world that allows euthanasia and assisted suicide (EAS) due to psychiatric suffering. METHODS In 2015-2017 the Dutch regional euthanasia review committees published 43 case summaries online. Of these, 35 were suitable for analysis regarding patient characteristics and physician involvement, and 3 cases were described in detail.
RESULTS: In total, 77% of the patients were women and 51% were aged 50-70 years. Major depression disorder and personality disorders were present in almost half of the patients. All patients were considered mentally competent. CONCLUSIONS Although the incidence of psychiatric EAS cases is rising, we found no shift in patient characteristics. The division between psychiatric and somatic suffering may prove more complicated than expected. Patients dying from suicide differ in various ways from patients dying through EAS. The fact that all patients are considered competent could mean that they are unjustly seen as being vulnerable or that the competence assessment lacks due diligence.

摘要

荷兰是世界上少数几个允许因精神痛苦而实施安乐死和协助自杀(EAS)的国家之一。方法:2015年至2017年,荷兰地区安乐死审查委员会在网上公布了43例病例摘要。其中,35例适合就患者特征和医生参与情况进行分析,3例进行了详细描述。结果:总体而言,77%的患者为女性,51%的患者年龄在50至70岁之间。近一半的患者患有重度抑郁症和人格障碍。所有患者都被认为具有精神行为能力。结论:尽管精神疾病安乐死和协助自杀病例的发生率在上升,但我们发现患者特征没有变化。精神痛苦和躯体痛苦之间的区分可能比预期的更为复杂。死于自杀的患者与通过安乐死和协助自杀死亡的患者在各种方面存在差异。所有患者都被认为具有行为能力这一事实可能意味着他们被不公正地视为弱势群体,或者行为能力评估缺乏应有的审慎。

相似文献

1
[Euthanasia of Dutch psychiatric patients in 2015-2017].[2015 - 2017年荷兰精神科患者的安乐死情况]
Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2019;61(4):241-247.
2
Euthanasia and assisted suicide for people with an intellectual disability and/or autism spectrum disorder: an examination of nine relevant euthanasia cases in the Netherlands (2012-2016).针对智障人士和/或自闭症谱系障碍患者的安乐死与协助自杀:对荷兰九起相关安乐死案例的审视(2012 - 2016年)
BMC Med Ethics. 2018 Mar 5;19(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0257-6.
3
Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide of Patients With Psychiatric Disorders in the Netherlands 2011 to 2014.2011年至2014年荷兰精神疾病患者的安乐死与协助自杀情况
JAMA Psychiatry. 2016 Apr;73(4):362-8. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.2887.
4
Capacity Evaluations of Psychiatric Patients Requesting Assisted Death in the Netherlands.荷兰申请协助死亡的精神病患者的能力评估。
Psychosomatics. 2016 Nov-Dec;57(6):556-565. doi: 10.1016/j.psym.2016.06.005. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
5
Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide in patients suffering from psychiatric disorders: a cross-sectional study exploring the experiences of Dutch psychiatrists.精神障碍患者的安乐死和医师协助自杀:一项横断面研究,旨在探索荷兰精神科医生的相关经验。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Feb 19;19(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2053-3.
6
Euthanasia and assisted suicide in the context of psychiatric disorders: sharing experiences from the Low Countries.精神障碍患者的安乐死和协助自杀:分享来自低地国家的经验。
Psychiatr Pol. 2020 Aug 31;54(4):661-672. doi: 10.12740/PP/124078.
7
Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide not meeting due care criteria in the Netherlands: a qualitative review of review committee judgements.荷兰不符合适当关怀标准的安乐死和医师协助自杀:审查委员会判决的定性审查。
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 25;7(10):e017628. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017628.
8
Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide of Persons With Dementia in the Netherlands.荷兰痴呆症患者的安乐死和协助自杀。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2020 Apr;28(4):466-477. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2019.08.015. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
9
The involvement of family in the Dutch practice of euthanasia and physician assisted suicide: a systematic mixed studies review.家庭在荷兰安乐死和医师协助自杀实践中的参与:系统混合研究综述。
BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Apr 5;20(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0361-2.
10
[Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide for patients with psychiatric illnesses: opinions of residents in psychiatry].[精神疾病患者的安乐死与医生协助自杀:精神科住院医师的观点]
Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2019;61(4):248-256.

引用本文的文献

1
The Dutch practice of euthanasia and assisted suicide in patients suffering from psychiatric disorders: a qualitative case review study.荷兰针对患有精神疾病患者实施安乐死和协助自杀的做法:一项定性病例回顾研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Oct 28;15:1452835. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1452835. eCollection 2024.
2
Capacity assessment for euthanasia in dementia: A qualitative study of 60 Dutch cases.痴呆症患者安乐死的能力评估:对60例荷兰案例的定性研究。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2025 Jan;73(1):112-122. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19218. Epub 2024 Oct 21.
3
Case report: Organ donation after euthanasia for psychiatric suffering: some of the practical and ethical lessons Martijn taught us.
病例报告:因精神痛苦实施安乐死后的器官捐献:马丁给我们带来的一些实践与伦理教训
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Mar 5;15:1234741. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1234741. eCollection 2024.
4
Improving control over euthanasia of persons with psychiatric illness: Lessons from the first Belgian criminal court case concerning euthanasia.加强对精神病患者安乐死的管控:比利时首例涉及安乐死的刑事法庭案件带来的启示
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 19;13:933748. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.933748. eCollection 2022.
5
Physician Assisted Death for Psychiatric Suffering: Experiences in the Netherlands.针对精神痛苦的医生协助死亡:荷兰的经验
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jun 20;13:895387. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.895387. eCollection 2022.
6
Establishing irremediable psychiatric suffering in the context of medical assistance in dying in the Netherlands: a qualitative study.在荷兰的协助死亡中确立不可挽回的精神痛苦:一项定性研究。
CMAJ. 2022 Apr 4;194(13):E485-E491. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.210929. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
7
Psychiatric euthanasia, suicide and the role of gender.精神科安乐死、自杀与性别角色。
Br J Psychiatry. 2022 Jan;220(1):10-13. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2021.95.
8
Medical Assistance in Dying for Patients with Borderline Personality Disorder: Considerations and Concerns.为边缘型人格障碍患者提供医疗协助死亡:考量与担忧
Can J Psychiatry. 2022 Jan;67(1):16-20. doi: 10.1177/0706743721993645. Epub 2021 Feb 12.