Suppr超能文献

理解工作中的幸福感:幸福论工作场所幸福感量表的编制与验证。

Understanding well-being at work: Development and validation of the eudaimonic workplace well-being scale.

机构信息

Department of Management, College of Business, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, United States of America.

Thunderbird School of Global Management, Arizona State University, Glendale, Arizona, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 Apr 25;14(4):e0215957. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215957. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

Given the amount of time and effort individuals pour into work, scholars and practitioners alike have spent considerable time and resources trying to understand well-being in the workplace. Unfortunately, much of the current research and measurement focuses on workplace well-being from only one perspective (i.e. hedonic well-being rather than eudaimonic well-being) or by generalizing between workplace well-being and general well-being. In this study, we sought to integrate the workplace context into the current eudaimonic perspective to develop an 8-item measure of eudaimonic workplace well-being. Using multi-wave data, we developed and validated a reliable, two-dimensional eudaimonic workplace well-being scale (EWWS). The measure replicated over seven samples and across 1346 participants and showed strong convergent, discriminant, and predictive validity. Furthermore, we combined EWWS with an existing measure of hedonic workplace well-being and the resulting model of overall workplace well-being explained a significant amount of variance in key organizational constructs over and above existing hedonic well-being measures. Overall, the present study suggests that the EWWS is a valuable and valid measure and, when taken together with hedonic workplace well-being, captures what it means to have a holistic sense of well-being at work.

摘要

鉴于个人在工作中投入的大量时间和精力,学者和从业者都花费了相当多的时间和资源来试图理解工作场所的幸福感。不幸的是,目前的许多研究和衡量标准都只从一个角度(即享乐幸福感而不是幸福论幸福感)关注工作场所幸福感,或者将工作场所幸福感和一般幸福感进行概括。在这项研究中,我们试图将工作场所背景纳入当前的幸福论视角,开发一种 8 项的幸福论工作场所幸福感衡量标准。我们使用多波数据开发并验证了一个可靠的、二维的幸福论工作场所幸福感量表(EWWS)。该衡量标准在七个样本和 1346 名参与者中得到了复制,表现出了强大的聚合、区别和预测效度。此外,我们将 EWWS 与现有的享乐工作场所幸福感衡量标准相结合,结果表明,整体工作场所幸福感模型在现有享乐幸福感衡量标准的基础上,对关键组织结构的解释具有显著的增量效度。总的来说,本研究表明 EWWS 是一种有价值且有效的衡量标准,当与享乐工作场所幸福感相结合时,它可以捕捉到在工作中拥有整体幸福感的含义。

相似文献

7
A practical scale for Multi-Faceted Organizational Health Climate Assessment.多层面组织健康气候评估实用量表。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2016 Apr;21(2):250-9. doi: 10.1037/a0039895. Epub 2015 Nov 16.
9
The Development and Validation of the Sexual and Relationship Distress Scale.性与关系困扰量表的编制与验证。
J Sex Med. 2018 Aug;15(8):1167-1179. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.06.004. Epub 2018 Jul 20.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Beyond Money: Toward an Economy of Well-Being.超越金钱:走向幸福经济。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2004 Jul;5(1):1-31. doi: 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00501001.x. Epub 2004 Jul 1.
4
The hierarchical structure of well-being.幸福的层次结构。
J Pers. 2009 Aug;77(4):1025-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00573.x. Epub 2009 May 18.
10
The Satisfaction With Life Scale.生活满意度量表。
J Pers Assess. 1985 Feb;49(1):71-5. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验