Department of Ophthalmology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Sci Rep. 2019 Apr 25;9(1):6557. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-42968-3.
This study compared the axial length (AL), central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), mean anterior corneal radius of curvature (Rm), and postoperative refractive outcomes obtained from two different swept-source optical coherence biometers, the ARGOS (Movu, Nagoya, Japan), which uses the segmental refractive index for each segment, and the IOLMaster 700 (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany), which uses an equivalent refractive index for the entire eye. One hundred and six eyes of 106 patients with cataracts were included. The refractive outcomes using the Barrett Universal II, Haigis, Hoffer Q, and SRK/T formulas were evaluated. The mean AL, CCT, ACD, and Rm differed significantly (P < 0.001) with the IOLMaster 700 (25.22 mm, 559 µm, 3.23 mm, and 7.69 mm) compared with the ARGOS (25.14 mm, 533 µm, 3.33 mm, and 7.66 mm). The mean LTs did not differ significantly. The percentages of eyes within ±0.50 and ±1.00 diopter of the predicted refraction did not differ significantly (P > 0.05). The accuracy of the intraocular lens power calculations was clinically acceptable with both biometers, although the ocular biometry using these two biometers exhibited certain differences.
本研究比较了两种不同的扫频源光相干生物测量仪(ARGOS,Movu,Nagoya,日本,其采用各节段分段折射率;IOLMaster 700,Carl Zeiss Meditec,Jena,德国,其采用整个眼球等效折射率)获得的眼轴长度(AL)、中央角膜厚度(CCT)、前房深度(ACD)、晶状体厚度(LT)、平均角膜前表面曲率半径(Rm)和术后屈光结果。纳入了 106 例白内障患者的 106 只眼。评估了使用 Barrett Universal II、Haigis、Hoffer Q 和 SRK/T 公式的屈光结果。与 ARGOS(25.14mm、533μm、3.33mm 和 7.66mm)相比,IOLMaster 700(25.22mm、559μm、3.23mm 和 7.69mm)的平均 AL、CCT、ACD 和 Rm 差异均有统计学意义(P<0.001)。平均 LT 无显著差异。预测屈光度±0.50 和±1.00 屈光度范围内的眼比例差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。尽管这两种生物测量仪的眼生物学存在一定差异,但两种生物测量仪的人工晶状体屈光度计算的准确性均具有临床可接受性。