Suppr超能文献

采用扫频源光学相干断层扫描的新型生物测量仪与采用部分相干干涉测量的传统生物测量仪的比较。

Comparison of a new biometer using swept-source optical coherence tomography and a conventional biometer using partial coherence interferometry.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Shiga, Japan.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Apr 24;13(4):e0196401. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196401. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the axial lengths (ALs) using a new biometer with swept-source optical coherence tomography (Argos) versus ALs using a conventional biometer with partial coherence interferometry (IOL Master, version 5). The ALs in 48 eyes of 48 cataract patients were measured with Argos using refractive indexes that correspond to the particular tissue and with IOL Master using a single refractive index. The eyes were divided into three subgroups by AL length: short-AL group (n = 16), <23.27 mm; intermediate-AL group (n = 16), 23.27-24.03 mm; long-AL group (n = 16), ≥24.04 mm. The ALs (mm) measured with the Argos and IOL Master biometers, respectively, were 22.77 ± 0.43 and 22.74 ± 0.44, 23.63 ± 0.21 and 23.62 ± 0.21, and 26.00 ± 1.61 and 26.05 ± 1.64 in the short-, intermediate-, and long-AL groups, respectively. The mean ALs with the Argos biometer were longer than those with the IOL Master biometer in the short-AL group (P = 0.002) There was no significant difference in the intermediate-AL groups (P = 0.14). In contrast, the mean ALs with the Argos biometer were shorter than those with the IOL Master biometer in the long-AL group (P < 0.001). Differences between the ALs measured with the two biometers were statistically significant in short- and long-AL subgroups. However, the differences might not be clinically significant.

摘要

本研究旨在比较使用新型生物测量仪(Argos)与扫频源光学相干断层扫描仪(Argos)测量的眼轴长度(AL)与使用传统生物测量仪(IOL Master,版本 5)测量的 AL。使用 Argos 测量了 48 例 48 眼白内障患者的 AL,折射率对应于特定组织,使用 IOL Master 测量了单一折射率。根据 AL 长度将眼睛分为三组:短 AL 组(n = 16),<23.27mm;中 AL 组(n = 16),23.27-24.03mm;长 AL 组(n = 16),≥24.04mm。Argos 和 IOL Master 生物测量仪分别测量的 AL(mm)分别为 22.77 ± 0.43 和 22.74 ± 0.44、23.63 ± 0.21 和 23.62 ± 0.21、26.00 ± 1.61 和 26.05 ± 1.64。短、中、长 AL 组中,Argos 生物测量仪的平均 AL 均长于 IOL Master 生物测量仪(P = 0.002)。中间 AL 组差异无统计学意义(P = 0.14)。相反,Argos 生物测量仪的平均 AL 短于 IOL Master 生物测量仪(P < 0.001)。两种生物测量仪测量的 AL 差异在短和长 AL 亚组中具有统计学意义。然而,这些差异可能没有临床意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/934b/5918161/505ae425636d/pone.0196401.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验