Suppr超能文献

将最近推出的2种设备的眼轴长度、角膜曲率和前房深度测量值与已知的生物测量仪进行比较。

Comparison of Axial Length, Corneal Curvature, and Anterior Chamber Depth Measurements of 2 Recently Introduced Devices to a Known Biometer.

作者信息

Shajari Mehdi, Cremonese Carla, Petermann Kerstin, Singh Pankaj, Müller Michael, Kohnen Thomas

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Department of Ophthalmology, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

出版信息

Am J Ophthalmol. 2017 Jun;178:58-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2017.02.027. Epub 2017 Mar 2.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Evaluate agreement and repeatability of axial length (AL), corneal curvature, and anterior chamber depth measurements of 2 new devices, 1 using Scheimpflug technology combined with partial coherence interferometry (Pentacam AXL) and 1 using swept-source optical coherence tomography (IOL Master 700) to a widely used optical biometer (IOL Master 500).

DESIGN

Prospective, instrument reliability analysis.

METHODS

This study was conducted in the Department of Ophthalmology at Goethe-University, Frankfurt, Germany. Seventy-nine eyes in 79 patients were measured with the IOL Master 500, the IOL Master 700, and with the Pentacam AXL. All eyes were measured twice with each device. The results were statistically compared using Bland-Altman plots. Outcome measures included AL, corneal curvature, and the measurement of anterior chamber depth.

RESULTS

The Bland-Altman analysis of axial length measurements with the IOL Master 500 and IOL Master 700 showed a mean difference of 0.008 mm between the 2 devices, with a coefficient of repeatability (COR) of 0.044 (P = .05). For measurements with the IOL Master 500 and Pentacam AXL, a mean difference of 0.026 mm and COR of 0.055 (P = .75) was found. For measurements with Pentacam AXL and IOL Master 700, a mean difference of -0.019 mm and COR of 0.052 (P = .06) was found. In terms of repeatability, there was no significant difference in measurement of any variable with any device. Vector analysis showed no significant difference for corneal astigmatism measurements (P = .84).

CONCLUSION

There was no statistically significant difference in compared biometric parameters performed with all 3 devices.

摘要

目的

评估两种新设备轴向长度(AL)、角膜曲率和前房深度测量的一致性和可重复性,一种设备采用Scheimpflug技术结合部分相干干涉测量法(Pentacam AXL),另一种设备采用扫频光学相干断层扫描技术(IOL Master 700),并与广泛使用的光学生物测量仪(IOL Master 500)进行比较。

设计

前瞻性仪器可靠性分析。

方法

本研究在德国法兰克福歌德大学眼科进行。对79例患者的79只眼睛使用IOL Master 500、IOL Master 700和Pentacam AXL进行测量。每种设备对所有眼睛均测量两次。使用Bland-Altman图对结果进行统计学比较。观察指标包括轴向长度、角膜曲率和前房深度测量。

结果

IOL Master 500和IOL Master 700轴向长度测量的Bland-Altman分析显示,两种设备之间的平均差异为0.008毫米,可重复性系数(COR)为0.044(P = 0.05)。IOL Master 500和Pentacam AXL测量的平均差异为0.026毫米,COR为0.055(P = 0.75)。Pentacam AXL和IOL Master 700测量的平均差异为-0.019毫米,COR为0.052(P = 0.06)。在可重复性方面,任何设备对任何变量的测量均无显著差异。矢量分析显示角膜散光测量无显著差异(P = 0.84)。

结论

使用所有三种设备进行的生物测量参数比较在统计学上无显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验