Dean of the Faculty of Health Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
IDS TILDA, University of Dublin Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 25;9(4):e025735. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025735.
To review systematically the evidence on how deinstitutionalisation affects quality of life (QoL) for adults with intellectual disabilities.
Systematic review.
Adults (aged 18 years and over) with intellectual disabilities.
A move from residential to community setting.
Studies were eligible if evaluating effect on QoL or life quality, as defined by study authors.
We searched MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CENTRAL, CINAHL, EconLit, Embase and Scopus to September 2017 and supplemented this with grey literature searches. We assessed study quality using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme suite of tools, excluding those judged to be of poor methodological quality.
Thirteen studies were included; eight quantitative studies, two qualitative, two mixed methods studies and one case study. There was substantial agreement across quantitative and qualitative studies that a move to community living was associated with improved QoL. QoL for people with any level of intellectual disabilities who move from any type of institutional setting to any type of community setting was increased at up to 1 year postmove (standardised mean difference [SMD] 2.03; 95% CI [1.21 to 2.85], five studies, 246 participants) and beyond 1 year postmove (SMD 2.34. 95% CI [0.49 to 4.20], three studies, 160 participants), with total QoL change scores higher at 24 months comparative to 12 months, regardless of QoL measure used.
Our systematic review demonstrated a consistent pattern that moving to the community was associated with improved QoL compared with the institution. It is recommended that gaps in the evidence base, for example, with regard to growing populations of older people with intellectual disability and complex needs are addressed.
CRD42018077406.
系统回顾非机构化如何影响智障成年人的生活质量(QoL)。
系统综述。
年龄在 18 岁及以上的智障成年人。
从居住环境到社区环境的转变。
如果研究评估了对生活质量的影响,则将其视为符合研究作者定义的 QoL。
我们检索了 MEDLINE、PsycINFO、CENTRAL、CINAHL、EconLit、Embase 和 Scopus,检索截至 2017 年 9 月,并补充了灰色文献检索。我们使用批判性评估技能计划工具套件评估了研究质量,排除了那些被认为方法质量较差的研究。
共纳入了 13 项研究,其中 8 项为定量研究,2 项为定性研究,2 项为混合方法研究,1 项为案例研究。定量和定性研究都有大量证据表明,搬到社区居住与生活质量的提高有关。从任何类型的机构环境搬到任何类型的社区环境的任何智力残疾程度的人,在搬迁后 1 年内(标准化均数差 [SMD] 2.03;95%置信区间 [1.21 至 2.85],5 项研究,246 名参与者)和 1 年以后(SMD 2.34;95%置信区间 [0.49 至 4.20],3 项研究,160 名参与者),生活质量得到提高,无论使用何种生活质量测量方法,24 个月的总体生活质量变化评分都高于 12 个月。
我们的系统综述表明,与机构相比,搬到社区与生活质量的提高有一致的关联。建议解决证据基础中的差距,例如,在智力残疾和复杂需求不断增长的老年人方面。
PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42018077406。