Das Namrata, Spence Jeffrey S, Aslan Sina, Vanneste Sven, Mudar Raksha, Rackley Audette, Quiceno Mary, Chapman Sandra Bond
Center for BrainHealth, The University of Texas at Dallas, Dallas, TX, United States.
Advance MRI, LLC, Frisco, TX, United States.
Front Neurosci. 2019 Apr 12;13:307. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00307. eCollection 2019.
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a non-invasive stimulation, represents a potential intervention to enhance cognition across clinical populations including Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). This randomized clinical trial in MCI investigated the effects of anodal tDCS (a-tDCS) delivered to left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) combined with gist-reasoning training (SMART) versus sham tDCS (s-tDCS) plus SMART on measures of cognitive and neural changes in resting cerebral blood flow (rCBF). We were also interested in SMART effects on cognitive performance regardless of the tDCS group.
Twenty-two MCI participants, who completed the baseline cognitive assessment (T1), were randomized into one of two groups: a-tDCS + SMART and s-tDCS + SMART. Of which, 20 participants completed resting pCASL MRI scan to measure rCBF. Eight SMART sessions were administered over 4 weeks with a-tDCS or s-tDCS stimulation for 20 min before each session. Participants were assessed immediately (T2) and 3-months after training (T3).
Significant group × time interactions showed cognitive gains at T2 in executive function (EF) measure of inhibition [DKEFS- Color word ( = 0.047)], innovation [TOSL ( = 0.01)] and on episodic memory [TOSL ( = 0.048)] in s-tDCS + SMART but not in a-tDCS + SMART group. Nonetheless, the gains did not persist for 3 months (T3) after the training. A voxel-based analysis showed significant increase in regional rCBF in the right middle frontal cortex (MFC) (cluster-wise = 0.05, = 1,168 mm) in a-tDCS + SMART compared to s-tDCS + SMART. No significant relationship was observed between the increased CBF with cognition. Irrespective of group, the combined MCI showed gains at T2 in EF of conceptual reasoning [DKEFS card sort ( = 0.033)] and category fluency [COWAT ( = 0.055)], along with gains at T3 in EF of verbal fluency [COWAT ( = 0.009)].
One intriguing finding is a-tDCS to left IFG plus SMART increased blood flow to right MFC, however, the stimulation seemingly blocked cognitive benefits of SMART on EF (inhibition and innovation) and episodic memory compared to s-tDCS + SMART group. Although the sample size is small, this paper contributes to growing evidence that cognitive training provides a way to significantly enhance cognitive performance in adults showing memory loss, where the role of a-tDCS in augmenting these effects need further study.
经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)是一种非侵入性刺激,是一种潜在的干预手段,可改善包括阿尔茨海默病和轻度认知障碍(MCI)在内的临床人群的认知能力。这项针对MCI的随机临床试验研究了将阳极tDCS(a-tDCS)应用于左侧额下回(IFG)并结合主旨推理训练(SMART)与假tDCS(s-tDCS)加SMART对静息脑血流量(rCBF)认知和神经变化指标的影响。我们还关注了无论tDCS组如何,SMART对认知表现的影响。
22名完成基线认知评估(T1)的MCI参与者被随机分为两组之一:a-tDCS + SMART组和s-tDCS + SMART组。其中,20名参与者完成了静息pCASL MRI扫描以测量rCBF。在4周内进行8次SMART训练,每次训练前进行20分钟的a-tDCS或s-tDCS刺激。在训练后立即(T2)和3个月后(T3)对参与者进行评估。
显著的组×时间交互作用显示,在T2时,s-tDCS + SMART组在执行功能(EF)的抑制[DKEFS-颜色词(= 0.047)]、创新[TOSL(= 0.01)]和情景记忆[TOSL(= 0.048)]方面有认知改善,而a-tDCS + SMART组没有。尽管如此,这些改善在训练后的3个月(T3)并未持续。基于体素的分析显示,与s-tDCS + SMART组相比,a-tDCS + SMART组右侧额中回(MFC)的局部rCBF显著增加(聚类校正p = 0.05,k = 1,168 mm)。未观察到CBF增加与认知之间的显著关系。无论组别如何,合并的MCI组在T2时概念推理[DKEFS卡片分类(= 0.033)]和类别流畅性[COWAT(= 0.055)]的EF方面有改善,在T3时言语流畅性[COWAT(= 0.009)]的EF方面有改善。
一个有趣的发现是,左侧IFG的a-tDCS加SMART增加了右侧MFC的血流量,然而,与s-tDCS + SMART组相比,这种刺激似乎阻碍了SMART对EF(抑制和创新)和情景记忆的认知益处。尽管样本量较小,但本文为越来越多的证据做出了贡献,即认知训练为显著提高有记忆丧失的成年人的认知表现提供了一种方法,其中a-tDCS在增强这些效果方面的作用需要进一步研究。