Center for Cognitive Studies, Tufts University,Medford,MA
Behav Brain Sci. 2018 Jan;41:e48. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X17000723.
We offer two kinds of constructive criticism in the spirit of support for Doris's socially scaffolded pluralism regarding agency. First: The skeptical force of potential "goofy influences" is not as straightforward as Doris argues. Second: Doris's positive theory must address more goofy influences due to social processes that appear to fall under his criteria for agency-promoting practices. Finally, we highlight "arms race" phenomena in Doris's social dynamics that invite closer attention in further development of his theory.
我们本着支持多丽丝关于能动作用的社会结构多元论的精神，提供了两种建设性的批评意见。第一：潜在的“愚蠢影响”的怀疑力量并不像多丽丝所认为的那样直接。第二：由于社会过程似乎符合他的促进能动作用实践的标准，因此多丽丝的积极理论必须解决更多的愚蠢影响。最后，我们强调了多丽丝社会动态中的“军备竞赛”现象，这在他的理论进一步发展中需要引起更多关注。
