Department of Anaesthesiology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Patient Care & Measurements, Philips Research, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2019 May 8;14(5):e0213402. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213402. eCollection 2019.
Early warning scores (EWS) are being increasingly embedded in hospitals over the world due to their promise to reduce adverse events and improve the outcomes of clinical patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical use of an automated modified EWS (MEWS) for patients after surgery.
This study conducted retrospective before-and-after comparative analysis of non-automated and automated MEWS for patients admitted to the surgical high-dependency unit in a tertiary hospital. Operational outcomes included number of recorded assessments of the individual MEWS elements, number of complete MEWS assessments, as well as adherence rate to related protocols. Clinical outcomes included hospital length of stay, in-hospital and 28-day mortality, and ICU readmission rate.
Recordings in the electronic medical record from the control period contained 7929 assessments of MEWS elements and were performed in 320 patients. Recordings from the intervention period contained 8781 assessments of MEWS elements in 273 patients, of which 3418 were performed with the automated EWS system. During the control period, 199 (2.5%) complete MEWS were recorded versus 3991 (45.5%) during intervention period. With the automated MEWS systems, the percentage of missing assessments and the time until the next assessment for patients with a MEWS of ≥2 decreased significantly. The protocol adherence improved from 1.1% during the control period to 25.4% when the automated MEWS system was involved. There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes.
Implementation of an automated EWS system on a surgical high dependency unit improves the number of complete MEWS assessments, registered vital signs, and adherence to the EWS hospital protocol. However, this positive effect did not translate into a significant decrease in mortality, hospital length of stay, or ICU readmissions. Future research and development on automated EWS systems should focus on data management and technology interoperability.
由于早期预警评分(EWS)有望减少不良事件并改善临床患者的结局,因此它在世界范围内的医院中得到了越来越多的应用。本研究旨在评估用于手术后患者的自动化改良 EWS(MEWS)的临床应用。
本研究对一家三级医院外科高依赖病房的非自动化和自动化 MEWS 进行了回顾性前后对照分析。操作结果包括记录的个体 MEWS 元素评估次数、完整 MEWS 评估次数以及对相关方案的遵守率。临床结果包括住院时间、院内和 28 天死亡率以及 ICU 再入院率。
对照期电子病历中的记录包含 7929 次 MEWS 元素评估,涉及 320 名患者;干预期的记录包含 273 名患者的 8781 次 MEWS 元素评估,其中 3418 次是使用自动化 EWS 系统进行的。在对照期,记录了 199 次(2.5%)完整的 MEWS,而在干预期则记录了 3991 次(45.5%)。使用自动化 MEWS 系统后,MEWS≥2 的患者缺失评估和下一次评估之间的时间明显减少。当使用自动化 MEWS 系统时,方案的遵守率从对照期的 1.1%提高到 25.4%。临床结局没有显著差异。
在外科高依赖病房实施自动化 EWS 系统可增加完整 MEWS 评估次数、登记的生命体征和对 EWS 医院方案的遵守率。然而,这种积极影响并未转化为死亡率、住院时间或 ICU 再入院率的显著降低。未来对自动化 EWS 系统的研究和开发应侧重于数据管理和技术互操作性。