• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电子病历的实时自动采样可预测医院死亡率。

Real-Time Automated Sampling of Electronic Medical Records Predicts Hospital Mortality.

作者信息

Khurana Hargobind S, Groves Robert H, Simons Michael P, Martin Mary, Stoffer Brenda, Kou Sherri, Gerkin Richard, Reiman Eric, Parthasarathy Sairam

机构信息

Banner TeleHealth, Mesa, Ariz; Care Management, Banner Health, Phoenix, Ariz; Health Management, Banner Health, Phoenix, Ariz.

Banner TeleHealth, Mesa, Ariz; Care Management, Banner Health, Phoenix, Ariz; Health Management, Banner Health, Phoenix, Ariz.

出版信息

Am J Med. 2016 Jul;129(7):688-698.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.02.037. Epub 2016 Mar 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.02.037
PMID:27019043
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4916370/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Real-time automated continuous sampling of electronic medical record data may expeditiously identify patients at risk for death and enable prompt life-saving interventions. We hypothesized that a real-time electronic medical record-based alert could identify hospitalized patients at risk for mortality.

METHODS

An automated alert was developed and implemented to continuously sample electronic medical record data and trigger when at least 2 of 4 systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria plus at least one of 14 acute organ dysfunction parameters was detected. The systemic inflammatory response syndrome and organ dysfunction alert was applied in real time to 312,214 patients in 24 hospitals and analyzed in 2 phases: training and validation datasets.

RESULTS

In the training phase, 29,317 (18.8%) triggered the alert and 5.2% of such patients died, whereas only 0.2% without the alert died (unadjusted odds ratio 30.1; 95% confidence interval, 26.1-34.5; P < .0001). In the validation phase, the sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve, and positive and negative likelihood ratios for predicting mortality were 0.86, 0.82, 0.84, 4.9, and 0.16, respectively. Multivariate Cox-proportional hazard regression model revealed greater hospital mortality when the alert was triggered (adjusted hazards ratio 4.0; 95% confidence interval, 3.3-4.9; P < .0001). Triggering the alert was associated with additional hospitalization days (+3.0 days) and ventilator days (+1.6 days; P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

An automated alert system that continuously samples electronic medical record data can be implemented, has excellent test characteristics, and can assist in the real-time identification of hospitalized patients at risk for death.

摘要

背景

对电子病历数据进行实时自动连续采样可迅速识别有死亡风险的患者,并能及时进行挽救生命的干预措施。我们推测基于电子病历的实时警报能够识别住院患者的死亡风险。

方法

开发并实施了一种自动警报,以持续采样电子病历数据,并在检测到4项全身炎症反应综合征标准中的至少2项以及14项急性器官功能障碍参数中的至少1项时触发警报。全身炎症反应综合征和器官功能障碍警报被实时应用于24家医院的312214名患者,并分两个阶段进行分析:训练数据集和验证数据集。

结果

在训练阶段,29317名(18.8%)患者触发了警报,此类患者中有5.2%死亡,而未触发警报的患者中只有0.2%死亡(未调整优势比为30.1;95%置信区间为26.1 - 34.5;P <.0001)。在验证阶段,预测死亡率的敏感性、特异性、曲线下面积、阳性和阴性似然比分别为0.86、0.82、0.84、4.9和0.16。多变量Cox比例风险回归模型显示,触发警报时医院死亡率更高(调整后风险比为4.0;95%置信区间为3.3 - 4.9;P <.0001)。触发警报与额外的住院天数(增加3.0天)和呼吸机使用天数(增加1.6天;P <.0001)相关。

结论

一种对电子病历数据进行连续采样的自动警报系统可以实施,具有出色的测试特征,并且能够协助实时识别有死亡风险的住院患者。

相似文献

1
Real-Time Automated Sampling of Electronic Medical Records Predicts Hospital Mortality.电子病历的实时自动采样可预测医院死亡率。
Am J Med. 2016 Jul;129(7):688-698.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.02.037. Epub 2016 Mar 24.
2
Does Use of Electronic Alerts for Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) to Identify Patients With Sepsis Improve Mortality?电子警报系统用于全身性炎症反应综合征 (SIRS) 以识别脓毒症患者是否能提高死亡率?
Am J Med. 2019 Jul;132(7):862-868. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.01.032. Epub 2019 Mar 2.
3
Quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment predicts 72-h mortality in patients with suspected infection.快速脓毒症相关器官衰竭评估预测疑似感染患者 72 小时死亡率。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2019 Oct;26(5):323-328. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000563.
4
Adaptation and Validation of a Pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score and Evaluation of the Sepsis-3 Definitions in Critically Ill Children.儿童序贯器官衰竭评估评分的适应性与验证及危重症儿童中脓毒症-3定义的评估
JAMA Pediatr. 2017 Oct 2;171(10):e172352. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.2352.
5
Influence of systemic inflammatory response syndrome and sepsis on outcome of critically ill infected patients.全身炎症反应综合征和脓毒症对重症感染患者预后的影响。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003 Jul 1;168(1):77-84. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200208-785OC. Epub 2003 Apr 17.
6
Time to Recognition of Sepsis in the Emergency Department Using Electronic Health Record Data: A Comparative Analysis of Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, and Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment.急诊科使用电子健康记录数据识别脓毒症的时间:全身炎症反应综合征、序贯器官衰竭评估和快速序贯器官衰竭评估的比较分析。
Crit Care Med. 2020 Feb;48(2):200-209. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004132.
7
The Combined SIRS + qSOFA (qSIRS) Score is More Accurate Than qSOFA Alone in Predicting Mortality in Patients with Surgical Sepsis in an LMIC Emergency Department.联合 SIRS + qSOFA(qSIRS)评分比单独 qSOFA 更能准确预测中低收入国家急诊外科脓毒症患者的死亡率。
World J Surg. 2020 Jan;44(1):21-29. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-05181-x.
8
Investigating the Impact of Different Suspicion of Infection Criteria on the Accuracy of Quick Sepsis-Related Organ Failure Assessment, Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, and Early Warning Scores.探讨不同感染怀疑标准对快速脓毒症相关器官功能衰竭评估、全身炎症反应综合征及预警评分准确性的影响。
Crit Care Med. 2017 Nov;45(11):1805-1812. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002648.
9
Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment and Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome Criteria as Predictors of Critical Care Intervention Among Patients With Suspected Infection.快速序贯器官衰竭评估和全身炎症反应综合征标准作为疑似感染患者重症监护干预预测指标的研究
Crit Care Med. 2017 Nov;45(11):1813-1819. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002622.
10
Quick sequential organ failure assessment compared to systemic inflammatory response syndrome for predicting sepsis in emergency department.快速序贯器官衰竭评估与全身炎症反应综合征对急诊科脓毒症的预测比较。
J Crit Care. 2017 Dec;42:12-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.06.020. Epub 2017 Jun 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving Unadjusted and Adjusted Mortality With an Early Warning Sepsis System in the Emergency Department and Inpatient Wards.在急诊科和住院病房使用早期预警脓毒症系统改善未经调整和调整后的死亡率。
Fed Pract. 2021 Nov;38(11):508-515b. doi: 10.12788/fp.0194.
2
Artificial intelligence with multi-functional machine learning platform development for better healthcare and precision medicine.开发具有多功能机器学习平台的人工智能,以实现更优质的医疗保健和精准医疗。
Database (Oxford). 2020 Jan 1;2020. doi: 10.1093/database/baaa010.
3
Emergency Department Visits and Subsequent Hospital Admission Trends for Patients with Chest Pain and a History of Coronary Artery Disease.有胸痛和冠状动脉疾病史患者的急诊科就诊及随后的住院趋势
Cardiol Ther. 2020 Jun;9(1):153-165. doi: 10.1007/s40119-020-00168-5. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
4
Prospective and External Evaluation of a Machine Learning Model to Predict In-Hospital Mortality of Adults at Time of Admission.机器学习模型对入院时成人院内死亡率的前瞻性和外部评估。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Feb 5;3(2):e1920733. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.20733.
5
Sepsis surveillance: an examination of parameter sensitivity and alert reliability.脓毒症监测:参数敏感性与警报可靠性的检验
JAMIA Open. 2019 Jun 11;2(3):339-345. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooz014. eCollection 2019 Oct.
6
An investigation of sepsis surveillance and emergency treatment on patient mortality outcomes: An observational cohort study.脓毒症监测与急诊治疗对患者死亡率影响的调查:一项观察性队列研究。
JAMIA Open. 2018 May 15;1(1):107-114. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooy013. eCollection 2018 Jul.
7
A Machine Learning Algorithm to Predict Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: Development, Implementation, and Impact on Clinical Practice.一种用于预测严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克的机器学习算法:开发、实施及其对临床实践的影响。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Nov;47(11):1485-1492. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003891.
8
Scalable and accurate deep learning with electronic health records.借助电子健康记录实现可扩展且准确的深度学习。
NPJ Digit Med. 2018 May 8;1:18. doi: 10.1038/s41746-018-0029-1. eCollection 2018.
9
Implementation of an automated early warning scoring system in a surgical ward: Practical use and effects on patient outcomes.在外科病房实施自动化早期预警评分系统:实际应用及对患者结局的影响。
PLoS One. 2019 May 8;14(5):e0213402. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213402. eCollection 2019.
10
A quality improvement project to improve the Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) sepsis bundle compliance rate in a large healthcare system.一项旨在提高大型医疗系统中医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)脓毒症综合治疗方案依从率的质量改进项目。
BMJ Open Qual. 2017 Oct 21;6(2):e000080. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000080. eCollection 2017.

本文引用的文献

1
A targeted real-time early warning score (TREWScore) for septic shock.针对脓毒性休克的靶向实时预警评分(TREWScore)。
Sci Transl Med. 2015 Aug 5;7(299):299ra122. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aab3719.
2
Association of Pioneer Accountable Care Organizations vs traditional Medicare fee for service with spending, utilization, and patient experience.先驱责任医疗组织与传统 Medicare 按服务收费制在支出、利用和患者体验方面的关联。
JAMA. 2015 Jun 2;313(21):2152-61. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.4930.
3
Systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria in defining severe sepsis.全身性炎症反应综合征标准在严重脓毒症中的应用。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Apr 23;372(17):1629-38. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1415236. Epub 2015 Mar 17.
4
Prognostic and Prediction Tools in Bladder Cancer: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature.膀胱癌的预后和预测工具:文献综述。
Eur Urol. 2015 Aug;68(2):238-53. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.01.032. Epub 2015 Feb 21.
5
Risk prediction models for postoperative delirium: a systematic review and meta-analysis.术后谵妄的风险预测模型:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014 Dec;62(12):2383-90. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13138.
6
Development, implementation, and impact of an automated early warning and response system for sepsis.脓毒症自动早期预警与反应系统的开发、实施及影响
J Hosp Med. 2015 Jan;10(1):26-31. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2259. Epub 2014 Sep 26.
7
Severe sepsis outcomes: how are we doing?*.
Crit Care Med. 2014 Sep;42(9):2126-7. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000443.
8
Scoring systems in the intensive care unit: A compendium.重症监护病房的评分系统:概要
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2014 Apr;18(4):220-8. doi: 10.4103/0972-5229.130573.
9
Continuous monitoring in an inpatient medical-surgical unit: a controlled clinical trial.在住院内科外科病房进行连续监测:一项对照临床试验。
Am J Med. 2014 Mar;127(3):226-32. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.12.004. Epub 2013 Dec 14.
10
Using electronic health record data to develop and validate a prediction model for adverse outcomes in the wards*.利用电子健康记录数据开发和验证病房不良结局预测模型*。
Crit Care Med. 2014 Apr;42(4):841-8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000038.