Cox Rebecca J, Nol Pauline, Ellis Christine K, Palmer Mitchell V
National Animal Disease Center, National Veterinary Service Laboratories and Center for Veterinary Biologics, National Centers for Animal Health, United States Department of Agriculture, Ames, Iowa.
Center for Epidemiology and Animal Health.
ILAR J. 2019 Dec 31;60(1):66-73. doi: 10.1093/ilar/ilz006.
In fiscal year 2016, agricultural animals such as swine, sheep, goats, and cattle represented 10% of the 820 812 animals used in USDA-regulated research. In addition to traditional agricultural animals, research studies using captive wildlife are becoming increasingly important as human and livestock populations encroach upon, and thus expand interactions with, wildlife populations on the landscape. Optimum healthcare of both livestock and captive wildlife in a research setting requires proper husbandry, management, and veterinary care. Regardless of animal species, proper care and management are essential for animal well-being, valid research data, and the health and safety of animal care personnel. Using wildlife in research presents unique challenges as there is generally limited peer-reviewed research on wildlife welfare, husbandry, and nutrition. Animals often become excited during handling or transport, and care must be taken to avoid injury. When severe injuries do occur, differences may exist in methods of euthanasia. Many wildlife species are evolutionarily programmed to conceal signs of illness, making assessment of their condition difficult; moreover, attending veterinarians are often not as experienced in the care of wildlife as they are in the care of traditional laboratory animals or livestock. These differences are further magnified in the context of wildlife field research. The concepts of replace, reduce, and refine are as valid in livestock and wildlife research as in biomedical research, and investigators should work closely with their Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees to ensure humane animal care. The Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee is centrally important in providing guidelines relative to ethical use of animal subjects for research and can serve as a valuable resource for research accountability.
在2016财年,猪、羊、山羊和牛等农业动物占美国农业部监管研究中使用的820812只动物的10%。除了传统的农业动物,随着人类和牲畜数量的增加,与野生动物的互动增多,使用圈养野生动物的研究变得越来越重要。在研究环境中,对牲畜和圈养野生动物进行最佳医疗保健需要适当的饲养、管理和兽医护理。无论动物种类如何,适当的护理和管理对于动物的福祉、有效的研究数据以及动物护理人员的健康和安全都是至关重要的。在研究中使用野生动物带来了独特的挑战,因为关于野生动物福利、饲养和营养的同行评审研究通常有限。动物在处理或运输过程中往往会变得兴奋,必须小心避免受伤。当确实发生严重伤害时,安乐死方法可能存在差异。许多野生动物在进化过程中会隐藏疾病迹象,这使得评估它们的状况变得困难;此外,主治兽医在照顾野生动物方面的经验往往不如照顾传统实验动物或牲畜丰富。在野生动物野外研究的背景下,这些差异会进一步放大。替代、减少和优化的概念在牲畜和野生动物研究中与生物医学研究中同样有效,研究人员应与他们所在机构的动物护理和使用委员会密切合作,以确保人道地对待动物。机构动物护理和使用委员会在提供有关研究中动物受试者伦理使用的指导方针方面至关重要,并且可以作为研究问责制的宝贵资源。