• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)在脑卒中康复中的反应性、最小临床重要差异及效度

Responsiveness, Minimal Clinically Important Difference, and Validity of the MoCA in Stroke Rehabilitation.

作者信息

Wu Ching-Yi, Hung Shuan-Ju, Lin Keh-Chung, Chen Kai-Hua, Chen Poyu, Tsay Pei-Kwei

机构信息

Department of Occupational Therapy and Graduate Institute of Behavioral Sciences, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

出版信息

Occup Ther Int. 2019 Apr 14;2019:2517658. doi: 10.1155/2019/2517658. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1155/2019/2517658
PMID:31097928
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6487084/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Persons with stroke frequently suffer from cognitive impairment. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), a recently developed screening tool, is sensitive to poststroke cognitive deficits. The present study assessed its psychometric and clinimetric properties (i.e., responsiveness, minimal clinically important difference (MCID), and criterion validity) in stroke survivors receiving rehabilitative therapy.

METHOD

The MoCA and the Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) were administered to 65 stroke survivors before and after 4 to 5 weeks of therapy. The effect size and standardized response mean (SRM) were calculated for responsiveness. Anchor- and distribution-based methods were used to estimate the MCID. Criterion validity was measured with the Spearman correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

The responsiveness of the MoCA was moderate (SRM = 0.67). Participants exceeding the MCID according to the anchor- and distribution-based approaches were 33 (50.77%) and 20 (30.77%), respectively. Fair to good concurrent validity was reported between the MoCA and the SIS communication subscale. The MoCA had satisfactory predictive validity with the SIS communication and memory subscales.

CONCLUSION

This study may support the responsiveness, MCID, and criterion validity of the MoCA in stroke populations. Future studies with larger sample sizes are needed to validate the current findings.

摘要

目的

中风患者常伴有认知障碍。蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)是一种最近开发的筛查工具,对中风后认知缺陷敏感。本研究评估了其在接受康复治疗的中风幸存者中的心理测量和临床测量特性(即反应性、最小临床重要差异(MCID)和效标效度)。

方法

在治疗4至5周前后,对65名中风幸存者进行MoCA和中风影响量表(SIS)评估。计算效应量和标准化反应均值(SRM)以评估反应性。采用基于锚定和分布的方法估计MCID。用Spearman相关系数测量效标效度。

结果

MoCA的反应性中等(SRM = 0.67)。根据基于锚定和分布的方法,超过MCID的参与者分别为33人(50.77%)和20人(30.77%)。MoCA与SIS沟通子量表之间的同时效度为中等至良好。MoCA与SIS沟通和记忆子量表具有良好的预测效度。

结论

本研究可能支持MoCA在中风人群中的反应性、MCID和效标效度。需要未来更大样本量的研究来验证当前的研究结果。

相似文献

1
Responsiveness, Minimal Clinically Important Difference, and Validity of the MoCA in Stroke Rehabilitation.蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)在脑卒中康复中的反应性、最小临床重要差异及效度
Occup Ther Int. 2019 Apr 14;2019:2517658. doi: 10.1155/2019/2517658. eCollection 2019.
2
Validity, responsiveness, and minimal clinically important difference of EQ-5D-5L in stroke patients undergoing rehabilitation.EQ-5D-5L在接受康复治疗的中风患者中的效度、反应度及最小临床重要差异
Qual Life Res. 2016 Jun;25(6):1585-96. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-1196-z. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
3
Psychometric comparisons of the Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 and Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale. Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 与 Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale 的心理测量学比较。
Qual Life Res. 2010 Apr;19(3):435-43. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9597-5. Epub 2010 Feb 4.
4
Is the difference real, is the difference relevant: the minimal detectable and clinically important changes in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment.差异是真实存在的吗,差异有意义吗:蒙特利尔认知评估中的最小可检测变化及临床重要变化
Cereb Circ Cogn Behav. 2024 May 3;6:100222. doi: 10.1016/j.cccb.2024.100222. eCollection 2024.
5
Concurrent validity of the short version of Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) for patients with stroke.蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)短版对脑卒中患者的同时效度。
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 30;11(1):7204. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86615-2.
6
Screening and facilitating further assessment for cognitive impairment after stroke: application of a shortened Montreal Cognitive Assessment (miniMoCA).中风后认知障碍的筛查及促进进一步评估:简短版蒙特利尔认知评估量表(miniMoCA)的应用
Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(6):601-4. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1047968. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
7
Criterion and convergent validity of the Montreal cognitive assessment with screening and standardized neuropsychological testing.蒙特利尔认知评估量表与筛查和标准化神经心理学测试的效标和 convergent 效度。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013 Dec;61(12):2181-2185. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12541. Epub 2013 Dec 9.
8
Validity and reliability of the Persian version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA-P) scale among subjects with Parkinson's disease.帕金森病患者中蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA-P)波斯语版本的有效性和可靠性。
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2020 Sep-Oct;27(5):431-439. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2019.1565762. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
9
Psychometrics and diagnostic properties of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment 5-min protocol in screening for Mild Cognitive Impairment and dementia among older adults in Tanzania: A validation study.《在坦桑尼亚老年人中使用蒙特利尔认知评估 5 分钟方案进行轻度认知障碍和痴呆筛查的心理测量学和诊断特性:一项验证研究》
Int J Older People Nurs. 2021 Jan;16(1):e12348. doi: 10.1111/opn.12348. Epub 2020 Sep 13.
10
The diagnostic accuracy of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in inpatient stroke rehabilitation.蒙特利尔认知评估在住院脑卒中康复中的诊断准确性。
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2019 Sep;29(8):1163-1176. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2017.1372297. Epub 2017 Sep 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Prospective Evaluation of Neurocognition in Patients Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后患者神经认知功能的前瞻性评估
Struct Heart. 2025 Apr 4;9(9):100468. doi: 10.1016/j.shj.2025.100468. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
The Potential of Virtual Reality-Based Multisensory Interventions in Enhancing Cognitive Function in Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review.基于虚拟现实的多感官干预对改善轻度认知障碍患者认知功能的潜力:一项系统综述。
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 4;14(15):5475. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155475.
3
Interventions to improve cognitive performance in chronic kidney disease: A scoping review.改善慢性肾脏病认知功能的干预措施:一项范围综述
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 7;20(8):e0329815. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329815. eCollection 2025.
4
Enhancing cognitive and physical performance in older adults through wearable sensor-based interactive cognitive-motor training: a randomized clinical trial.通过基于可穿戴传感器的交互式认知运动训练提高老年人的认知和身体表现:一项随机临床试验。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 28;15(1):18604. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-03725-x.
5
PEMOCS: effects of a concept-guided, PErsonalized, MOtor-Cognitive exergame training on cognitive functions and gait in chronic Stroke-a randomized, controlled trial.PEMOCS:一项概念引导、个性化、运动认知型电子游戏训练对慢性卒中患者认知功能和步态影响的随机对照试验
Front Aging Neurosci. 2025 Mar 13;17:1514594. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2025.1514594. eCollection 2025.
6
Virtually assisted home rehabilitation after acute stroke (VAST-rehab): A descriptive pilot study for young and underserved stroke survivors.急性卒中后虚拟辅助居家康复(VAST-rehab):针对年轻及服务不足的卒中幸存者的描述性试点研究。
Digit Health. 2025 Mar 17;11:20552076251324443. doi: 10.1177/20552076251324443. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
7
Randomized crossover trial on motor and non-motor outcome of directional deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease.帕金森病定向深部脑刺激运动和非运动结果的随机交叉试验。
NPJ Parkinsons Dis. 2024 Oct 26;10(1):204. doi: 10.1038/s41531-024-00812-0.
8
Cognitive prehabilitation for older adults undergoing elective surgery: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.择期手术老年患者的认知预康复:系统评价与叙述性综合分析
Front Aging Neurosci. 2024 Oct 4;16:1474504. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2024.1474504. eCollection 2024.
9
Examination of the proportion and characteristics of cognitive function changes during hospitalization in patients with cardiovascular diseases.检查心血管疾病患者住院期间认知功能变化的比例和特征。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 22;19(8):e0309306. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309306. eCollection 2024.
10
Genetic Variation and Stroke Recovery: The STRONG Study.遗传变异与中风康复:STRONG 研究。
Stroke. 2024 Aug;55(8):2094-2102. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.047643. Epub 2024 Jul 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Cross-Cultural Applicability of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA): A Systematic Review.蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)的跨文化适用性:一项系统综述
J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;58(3):789-801. doi: 10.3233/JAD-161042.
2
Temporal stability and responsiveness of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment following acquired brain injury.脑损伤后蒙特利尔认知评估的时间稳定性和反应性
Brain Inj. 2016;30(1):29-35. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2015.1079732. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
3
Relationship between the Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Mini-mental State Examination for assessment of mild cognitive impairment in older adults.蒙特利尔认知评估量表与简易精神状态检查表在评估老年人轻度认知障碍中的关系。
BMC Geriatr. 2015 Sep 7;15:107. doi: 10.1186/s12877-015-0103-3.
4
Potential predictors for health-related quality of life in stroke patients undergoing inpatient rehabilitation.接受住院康复治疗的中风患者健康相关生活质量的潜在预测因素。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015 Aug 5;13:118. doi: 10.1186/s12955-015-0314-5.
5
Characteristics of Cognitive Impairment in Patients With Post-stroke Aphasia.脑卒中后失语症患者认知障碍的特征
Ann Rehabil Med. 2014 Dec;38(6):759-65. doi: 10.5535/arm.2014.38.6.759. Epub 2014 Dec 24.
6
Post-stroke cognitive impairment: high prevalence and determining factors in a cohort of mild stroke.中风后认知障碍:轻度中风队列中的高患病率及决定因素
J Alzheimers Dis. 2014;40(4):1029-38. doi: 10.3233/JAD-131580.
7
Impact of post-stroke cognitive impairment with no dementia on health-related quality of life.卒中后认知障碍但无痴呆对健康相关生活质量的影响。
J Stroke. 2013 Jan;15(1):49-56. doi: 10.5853/jos.2013.15.1.49. Epub 2013 Jan 31.
8
Nonlinguistic cognitive impairment in poststroke aphasia: a prospective study.卒中后失语症的非语言认知障碍:一项前瞻性研究。
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014 Mar-Apr;28(3):273-81. doi: 10.1177/1545968313508467. Epub 2013 Nov 8.
9
Prevalence of poststroke cognitive impairment: South London Stroke Register 1995-2010.卒中后认知障碍的患病率:1995-2010 年南伦敦卒中登记研究。
Stroke. 2013 Jan;44(1):138-45. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.670844. Epub 2012 Nov 13.
10
Brief screening for mild cognitive impairment: validation of the Brazilian version of the Montreal cognitive assessment.简易认知障碍筛查:蒙特利尔认知评估的巴西版验证。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2013 Jan;28(1):34-40. doi: 10.1002/gps.3787. Epub 2012 Feb 27.