Suppr超能文献

联合治疗优于序贯单药治疗高血压的初始治疗:一项双盲随机对照试验。

Combination Therapy Is Superior to Sequential Monotherapy for the Initial Treatment of Hypertension: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

机构信息

Medicines Monitoring Unit, Division of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, University of Dundee, United Kingdom.

Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University College London (UCL), London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Nov 18;6(11):e006986. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006986.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Guidelines for hypertension vary in their preference for initial combination therapy or initial monotherapy, stratified by patient profile; therefore, we compared the efficacy and tolerability of these approaches.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed a 1-year, double-blind, randomized controlled trial in 605 untreated patients aged 18 to 79 years with systolic blood pressure (BP) ≥150 mm Hg or diastolic BP ≥95 mm Hg. In phase 1 (weeks 0-16), patients were randomly assigned to initial monotherapy (losartan 50-100 mg or hydrochlorothiazide 12.5-25 mg crossing over at 8 weeks), or initial combination (losartan 50-100 mg plus hydrochlorothiazide 12.5-25 mg). In phase 2 (weeks 17-32), all patients received losartan 100 mg and hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 to 25 mg. In phase 3 (weeks 33-52), amlodipine with or without doxazosin could be added to achieve target BP. Hierarchical primary outcomes were the difference from baseline in home systolic BP, averaged over phases 1 and 2 and, if significant, at 32 weeks. Secondary outcomes included adverse events, and difference in home systolic BP responses between tertiles of plasma renin. Home systolic BP after initial monotherapy fell 4.9 mm Hg (range: 3.7-6.0 mm Hg) less over 32 weeks (<0.001) than after initial combination but caught up at 32 weeks (difference 1.2 mm Hg [range: -0.4 to 2.8 mm Hg], =0.13). In phase 1, home systolic BP response to each monotherapy differed substantially between renin tertiles, whereas response to combination therapy was uniform and at least 5 mm Hg more than to monotherapy. There were no differences in withdrawals due to adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Initial combination therapy can be recommended for patients with BP >150/95 mm Hg.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00994617.

摘要

背景

由于患者特征不同,高血压指南在初始联合治疗或初始单药治疗的偏好上存在差异;因此,我们比较了这两种方法的疗效和耐受性。

方法和结果

我们对 605 例年龄在 18 至 79 岁之间、收缩压(BP)≥150mmHg 或舒张压(BP)≥95mmHg 的未经治疗的患者进行了为期 1 年的、双盲、随机对照试验。在第 1 阶段(第 0-16 周),患者随机分为初始单药治疗组(氯沙坦 50-100mg 或氢氯噻嗪 12.5-25mg,第 8 周交叉)或初始联合治疗组(氯沙坦 50-100mg 加氢氯噻嗪 12.5-25mg)。在第 2 阶段(第 17-32 周),所有患者均接受氯沙坦 100mg 和氢氯噻嗪 12.5-25mg。在第 3 阶段(第 33-52 周),可加用氨氯地平和/或多沙唑嗪以达到目标血压。分层的主要终点是第 1 阶段和第 2 阶段的平均自家庭收缩压与基线的差值,以及如果有统计学意义,在第 32 周的差值。次要终点包括不良事件和血浆肾素三分位组之间自家庭收缩压反应的差异。初始单药治疗后 32 周的自家庭收缩压下降 4.9mmHg(范围:3.7-6.0mmHg)(<0.001),低于初始联合治疗,但在第 32 周时恢复(差值 1.2mmHg,范围:-0.4 至 2.8mmHg)(=0.13)。在第 1 阶段,两种单药治疗的自家庭收缩压反应在肾素三分位组之间存在显著差异,而联合治疗的反应则是一致的,且至少比单药治疗高 5mmHg。因不良事件而停药的差异无统计学意义。

结论

对于血压>150/95mmHg 的患者,推荐初始联合治疗。

临床试验注册

网址:http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov。唯一标识符:NCT00994617。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f9f/5721778/48cfc4925b1d/JAH3-6-e006986-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验