• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

反馈影响风险下描述性选择中概率加权的可辨别性和吸引力成分。

Feedback Influences Discriminability and Attractiveness Components of Probability Weighting in Descriptive Choice Under Risk.

作者信息

Goyal Shruti, Miyapuram Krishna P

机构信息

Centre for Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2019 May 3;10:962. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00962. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00962
PMID:31130892
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6509417/
Abstract

Our understanding of the decisions made under scenarios where both descriptive and experience-based information are available is very limited. Underweighting of small probabilities was observed in the gain domain when both description and experience were provided. The divergence observed from the prospect theory suggests a need for a separate or modified theory of decision making under risk. Recent studies suggest a possible role of probability weighting in the choice behavior under risk. We investigated both gain and loss domains with and without feedback for small and large probability conditions. We characterized the shape of the probability weighting function by a two-parameter functional form representing discriminability (concave-convex shape) and attractiveness (level of absolute weights relative to objective probability). We replicated a fourfold pattern of risk attitude on non-WEIRD population. We find that feedback leads to underweighting of small probabilities and overweighting of large probabilities in the gain domain and overall underweighting of probabilities in the loss domain. We find that underweighting of small probabilities is driven by changes in discriminability and attractiveness components in the gain domain and changes in the attractiveness component in the loss domain. We have interpreted the results by proposing an updated belief-based account of decisions under uncertainty in which feedback, when available, influences the probability weighting mediating the choice behavior.

摘要

我们对于在既有描述性信息又有基于经验的信息的情况下所做决策的理解非常有限。当同时提供描述和经验时,在收益领域观察到小概率被低估的情况。与前景理论的分歧表明需要一种单独的或经过修正的风险决策理论。最近的研究表明概率加权在风险下的选择行为中可能发挥作用。我们研究了有反馈和无反馈情况下小概率和大概率条件下的收益和损失领域。我们通过一个双参数函数形式来刻画概率加权函数的形状,该函数形式表示可辨别性(凹凸形状)和吸引力(相对于客观概率的绝对权重水平)。我们在非西方、工业化、富裕、民主(WEIRD)人群中重现了风险态度的四重模式。我们发现反馈导致收益领域中小概率被低估、大概率被高估,而损失领域中概率总体被低估。我们发现小概率被低估是由收益领域中可辨别性和吸引力成分的变化以及损失领域中吸引力成分的变化驱动的。我们通过提出一种更新的基于信念的不确定性决策解释来解读这些结果,在这种解释中,反馈(如果可用)会影响介导选择行为的概率加权。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a866/6509417/8b0a05c55ee6/fpsyg-10-00962-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a866/6509417/28085eecd33e/fpsyg-10-00962-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a866/6509417/d7fe600beead/fpsyg-10-00962-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a866/6509417/8b0a05c55ee6/fpsyg-10-00962-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a866/6509417/28085eecd33e/fpsyg-10-00962-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a866/6509417/d7fe600beead/fpsyg-10-00962-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a866/6509417/8b0a05c55ee6/fpsyg-10-00962-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Feedback Influences Discriminability and Attractiveness Components of Probability Weighting in Descriptive Choice Under Risk.反馈影响风险下描述性选择中概率加权的可辨别性和吸引力成分。
Front Psychol. 2019 May 3;10:962. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00962. eCollection 2019.
2
Social Distance Reduces the Biases of Overweighting Small Probabilities and Underweighting Large Probabilities.社交距离减少了对小概率事件的高估和对大概率事件的低估的偏差。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2021 Aug;47(8):1309-1324. doi: 10.1177/0146167220969051. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
3
Feedback produces divergence from prospect theory in descriptive choice.反馈在描述性选择中产生了与前景理论的偏差。
Psychol Sci. 2008 Oct;19(10):1015-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02193.x.
4
Are probabilities overweighted or underweighted when rare outcomes are experienced (rarely)?当罕见结果出现(很少发生)时,概率是否被过度加权或加权不足?
Psychol Sci. 2009 Apr;20(4):473-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02319.x.
5
Uncertainty plus prior equals rational bias: an intuitive Bayesian probability weighting function.不确定性加先验等于理性偏差:直观的贝叶斯概率加权函数。
Psychol Rev. 2012 Oct;119(4):878-87. doi: 10.1037/a0029346. Epub 2012 Jul 16.
6
Music-evoked incidental happiness modulates probability weighting during risky lottery choices.音乐诱发的偶然幸福感调节风险彩票选择中的概率加权。
Front Psychol. 2014 Jan 7;4:981. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00981.
7
Yes, they can! Appropriate weighting of small probabilities as a function of information acquisition.是的,它们可以!根据信息获取情况对小概率进行适当加权。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 Nov;138(3):390-6. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.09.005. Epub 2011 Oct 5.
8
Stochastic representation decision theory: How probabilities and values are entangled dual characteristics in cognitive processes.随机表示决策理论:概率和价值如何在认知过程中纠缠为双重特征。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 14;15(12):e0243661. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243661. eCollection 2020.
9
Experience and rationality under risk: re-examining the impact of sampling experience.风险下的经验与理性:重新审视抽样经验的影响
Exp Econ. 2020;23(4):1100-1128. doi: 10.1007/s10683-019-09641-y. Epub 2020 Jan 16.
10
Neural response to reward anticipation under risk is nonlinear in probabilities.在风险下,神经对奖励预期的反应在概率上是非线性的。
J Neurosci. 2009 Feb 18;29(7):2231-7. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5296-08.2009.

本文引用的文献

1
A meta-analytic review of two modes of learning and the description-experience gap.两种学习模式与描述-体验差距的元分析综述。
Psychol Bull. 2018 Feb;144(2):140-176. doi: 10.1037/bul0000115. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
2
Analyzing Test-Taking Behavior: Decision Theory Meets Psychometric Theory.分析应试行为:决策理论与心理测量理论的结合
Psychometrika. 2015 Dec;80(4):1105-22. doi: 10.1007/s11336-014-9425-x. Epub 2014 Aug 21.
3
Maximization, learning, and economic behavior.最大化、学习和经济行为。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jul 22;111 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):10818-25. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1402846111. Epub 2014 Jul 14.
4
The weirdest people in the world?世界上最奇怪的人?
Behav Brain Sci. 2010 Jun;33(2-3):61-83; discussion 83-135. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X0999152X. Epub 2010 Jun 15.
5
The description-experience gap in risky choice.风险选择中的描述-体验差距。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 Dec;13(12):517-23. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2009.09.004. Epub 2009 Oct 14.
6
Neural correlates of value, risk, and risk aversion contributing to decision making under risk.价值、风险和风险厌恶的神经关联对风险决策的影响。
J Neurosci. 2009 Oct 7;29(40):12574-83. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2614-09.2009.
7
Feedback produces divergence from prospect theory in descriptive choice.反馈在描述性选择中产生了与前景理论的偏差。
Psychol Sci. 2008 Oct;19(10):1015-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02193.x.
8
Neuronal distortions of reward probability without choice.无选择情况下奖励概率的神经元扭曲。
J Neurosci. 2008 Nov 5;28(45):11703-11. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2870-08.2008.
9
The role of experience in decisions from description.经验在基于描述的决策中的作用。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Dec;14(6):1133-9. doi: 10.3758/bf03193102.
10
Prospect theory on the brain? Toward a cognitive neuroscience of decision under risk.大脑中的前景理论?迈向风险决策的认知神经科学。
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 Apr;23(1):34-50. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.01.016.