Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Med Phys. 2019 Aug;46(8):3582-3591. doi: 10.1002/mp.13624. Epub 2019 Jul 5.
The use of radiomic features as biomarkers of treatment response and outcome or as correlates to genomic variations requires that the computed features are robust and reproducible. Segmentation, a crucial step in radiomic analysis, is a major source of variability in the computed radiomic features. Therefore, we studied the impact of tumor segmentation variability on the robustness of MRI radiomic features.
Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (T1WI ) MRI of 90 patients diagnosed with glioblastoma were segmented using a semiautomatic algorithm and an interactive segmentation with two different raters. We analyzed the robustness of 108 radiomic features from five categories (intensity histogram, gray-level co-occurrence matrix, gray-level size-zone matrix (GLSZM), edge maps, and shape) using intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland and Altman analysis.
Our results show that both segmentation methods are reliable with ICC ≥ 0.96 and standard deviation (SD) of mean differences between the two raters (SD ) ≤ 30%. Features computed from the histogram and co-occurrence matrices were found to be the most robust (ICC ≥ 0.8 and SD ≤ 30% for most features in these groups). Features from GLSZM were shown to have mixed robustness. Edge, shape, and GLSZM features were the most impacted by the choice of segmentation method with the interactive method resulting in more robust features than the semiautomatic method. Finally, features computed from T1WI and FLAIR images were found to have similar robustness when computed with the interactive segmentation method.
Semiautomatic and interactive segmentation methods using two raters are both reliable. The interactive method produced more robust features than the semiautomatic method. We also found that the robustness of radiomic features varied by categories. Therefore, this study could help motivate segmentation methods and feature selection in MRI radiomic studies.
将放射组学特征用作治疗反应和结果的生物标志物,或用作与基因组变异的相关性,这就要求计算出的特征具有稳健性和可重复性。在放射组学分析中,分割是一个关键步骤,也是计算出的放射组学特征中变异性的主要来源。因此,我们研究了肿瘤分割变异性对 MRI 放射组学特征稳健性的影响。
对 90 名经诊断患有胶质母细胞瘤的患者的液体衰减反转恢复(FLAIR)和对比增强 T1 加权(T1WI)MRI 进行分割,使用半自动算法和两位不同的读者的交互式分割。我们使用组内相关系数(ICC)和 Bland 和 Altman 分析来分析来自五个类别(强度直方图、灰度共生矩阵、灰度大小区域矩阵(GLSZM)、边缘图和形状)的 108 个放射组学特征的稳健性。
我们的结果表明,这两种分割方法都具有很高的可靠性(ICC≥0.96,两位读者之间的平均差异标准差(SD)≤30%)。从直方图和共生矩阵计算得出的特征被发现是最稳健的(在这些组中,大多数特征的 ICC≥0.8,SD≤30%)。GLSZM 特征的稳健性则存在混合情况。边缘、形状和 GLSZM 特征受分割方法选择的影响最大,交互式方法产生的特征比半自动方法更稳健。最后,使用交互式分割方法计算时,发现 T1WI 和 FLAIR 图像的特征具有相似的稳健性。
使用两位读者的半自动和交互式分割方法都是可靠的。与半自动方法相比,交互式方法产生的特征更稳健。我们还发现,放射组学特征的稳健性因类别而异。因此,本研究有助于激发 MRI 放射组学研究中的分割方法和特征选择。