Sun Jinbin, Chen Ming, Cai Weijie, Wang Zhong, Wu Shaoning, Sun Xiao, Liu Hongbo
a School of Public Health , China Medical University , Shenyang , PR China.
b Department of Sports , China Medical University , Shenyang , PR China.
Chronobiol Int. 2019 Aug;36(8):1115-1123. doi: 10.1080/07420528.2019.1619181. Epub 2019 May 29.
Medical students who suffer from poor sleep quality may be afflicted by distress. While the change of chronotype may improve sleep quality, few studies have focused on this association. The objective of this study is to analyze the effects of chronotype on sleep quality in medical students while controlling for confounding covariate factors. A cross-sectional survey on sleep quality was conducted among 5497 medical students. Sleep quality, chronotype, and lifestyle were measured according to the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, Morningness-eveningness Questionnaire and Health-promoting Lifestyle Profile. Hierarchical logistic regression was conducted to analyze the influence of various factors, especially chronotype effect on sleep quality. Our results showed that the total score of sleep quality in evening-types was 5.43 ± 2.66, which was significantly higher than that in morning-types (3.88 ± 2.20, P < .001). Morning-type students (OR = 0.40, 95%CI = 0.29-0.55) and intermediate-type students (OR = 0.53, 95%CI = 0.41-0.69) had a lower risk of poor sleep quality compared to evening-types. The strongest predictor of sleep quality was chronotype while controlling for covariates (grade, gender, father's educational level, mother's educational level, internet addiction, mood state, midnight snack frequency, and health-promoting lifestyle profile). Based on the results, we believe that sleep quality among evening-type students may be improved by shifting to keep early hours.
睡眠质量差的医学生可能会感到苦恼。虽然昼夜节律类型的改变可能会改善睡眠质量,但很少有研究关注这种关联。本研究的目的是在控制混杂协变量因素的同时,分析昼夜节律类型对医学生睡眠质量的影响。对5497名医学生进行了关于睡眠质量的横断面调查。根据匹兹堡睡眠质量指数、晨型-夜型问卷和健康促进生活方式量表对睡眠质量、昼夜节律类型和生活方式进行了测量。采用分层逻辑回归分析各种因素的影响,尤其是昼夜节律类型对睡眠质量的影响。我们的结果显示,夜型学生的睡眠质量总分是5.43±2.66,显著高于晨型学生(3.88±2.20,P<.001)。与夜型学生相比,晨型学生(OR=0.40,95%CI=0.29-0.55)和中间型学生(OR=0.53,95%CI=0.41-0.69)睡眠质量差的风险较低。在控制协变量(年级、性别、父亲教育水平、母亲教育水平、网络成瘾、情绪状态、午夜零食频率和健康促进生活方式量表)的情况下,睡眠质量的最强预测因素是昼夜节律类型。基于这些结果,我们认为夜型学生的睡眠质量可能通过改为早睡早起得到改善。