Suppr超能文献

腐蚀性化学物质眼部灼伤的急救治疗:一项采用两种不同去污概念的30年纵向研究结果

First aid therapy for corrosive chemical eye burns: results of a 30-year longitudinal study with two different decontamination concepts.

作者信息

Wiesner N, Dutescu R M, Uthoff D, Kottek A, Reim M, Schrage N

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology Cologne Merheim, Kliniken der Stadt Köln, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, 51109, Cologne, Germany.

, Aachen, Germany.

出版信息

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019 Aug;257(8):1795-1803. doi: 10.1007/s00417-019-04350-x. Epub 2019 May 30.

Abstract

PURPOSE

There is currently uncertainty about the most efficacious decontamination solution for corrosive chemical eye burns. This 30-year longitudinal study evaluated the relative efficacy of two different decontamination methods. Passive decontamination consists of rinsing with tap water, 0.9% normal saline, isotonic buffered phosphate solution, or Ringer's lactate. Active decontamination adds an amphoteric, polyvalent, and chelating component with Previn® (Diphoterine®) solution (Laboratoire Prevor, Valmondois, France).

METHODS

A prospective evaluation of patients treated in two specialized eye clinics for eye burns was begun in 1988. Recorded data included exposure circumstances, type of corrosive, different types of first therapy, and clinical treatment and outcome. Patients were treated from clinic admission and up to 24 h after the corrosive chemical burn with rinsing for 15 min using two different protocols. From 1988 to 2005, sterile 0.9% normal saline or Ringer's lactate was used. Since 2006, sterile, hypertonic, amphoteric Previn® solution was used. Comparative statistical analysis was done with the Fisher contingency tables and Wilcoxon tests.

RESULTS

There were a total of 1495 patients with 2194 chemically burned eyes. In 1988-2005, the annual incidence was 66.1/year; in 2006-2017, it was 65.5/year. Similar incidences were noted when initial rinsing was with tap water or isotonic buffered phosphate solutions. There was a significantly more severe outcome of corrosive chemical eye burns with any first aid rinsing solutions other than Previn® solution or tap water was used (p < 0.001). Previn® solution or tap water rinsing in the pre-hospital setting and secondary rinsing with Previn® solution in the hospital decreased lesion severity in comparison with all other rinsing solutions (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The frequency of corrosive chemical eye burns was comparatively high despite tightening of occupational health and safety regulations over the past 30 years. The severity of corrosive chemical eye burns has been dramatically decreased since the introduction of Previn® solution for initial and secondary rinsing. A new protocol for immediate Previn® solution use by the Cologne Fire Brigade and secondary Previn® solution rinsing in hospital has reduced the frequency of severe corrosive chemical eye burns to less than 60% as compared to the period of 1988-2005 when other rinsing solutions were utilized.

摘要

目的

目前对于腐蚀性化学物质所致眼部烧伤,最有效的去污溶液尚无定论。这项为期30年的纵向研究评估了两种不同去污方法的相对疗效。被动去污包括用自来水、0.9%生理盐水、等渗磷酸盐缓冲溶液或乳酸林格氏液冲洗。主动去污则添加了一种两性、多价且具有螯合作用的成分,即Previn®(Diphoterine®)溶液(法国瓦尔蒙多瓦的Prevor实验室)。

方法

1988年开始对在两家专业眼科诊所接受眼部烧伤治疗的患者进行前瞻性评估。记录的数据包括暴露情况、腐蚀性物质类型、不同的首次治疗类型以及临床治疗和结果。患者从入院起至腐蚀性化学物质烧伤后24小时,使用两种不同方案冲洗15分钟。1988年至2005年,使用无菌0.9%生理盐水或乳酸林格氏液。自2006年起,使用无菌、高渗、两性的Previn®溶液。采用费舍尔列联表和威尔科克森检验进行比较统计分析。

结果

共有1495例患者,2194只眼睛受到化学烧伤。1988 - 2005年,年发病率为66.1/年;2006 - 2017年,年发病率为65.5/年。当初始冲洗使用自来水或等渗磷酸盐缓冲溶液时,发病率相似。与使用Previn®溶液或自来水以外的任何急救冲洗溶液相比,腐蚀性化学物质所致眼部烧伤的后果明显更严重(p < 0.001)。与所有其他冲洗溶液相比,在院前使用Previn®溶液冲洗并在医院用Previn®溶液进行二次冲洗可降低损伤严重程度(p < 0.001)。

结论

尽管过去30年职业健康与安全法规有所加强,但腐蚀性化学物质所致眼部烧伤的发生率仍相对较高。自引入Previn®溶液进行初次和二次冲洗以来,腐蚀性化学物质所致眼部烧伤的严重程度已大幅降低。科隆消防队立即使用Previn®溶液并在医院进行二次Previn®溶液冲洗的新方案,与1988 - 2005年使用其他冲洗溶液的时期相比,已将严重腐蚀性化学物质所致眼部烧伤的发生率降低至60%以下。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验