McBain Ryan K, Kareddy Vishnupriya, Cantor Jonathan H, Stein Bradley D, Yu Hao
RAND Corporation, Boston, MA.
RAND Corporation, Boston, MA.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2020 Jan;59(1):113-139. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2019.04.027. Epub 2019 May 29.
A diversity of health professional disciplines provide services for children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in the United States. We conducted a systematic review examining the availability, distribution, and competencies of the US workforce for autism-related child health care services, and assess studies' strength of evidence.
We searched PubMed, PsychINFO, Embase, and Google Scholar from 2008 to 2018 for relevant US-based studies. Two investigators independently screened and evaluated studies against a set of prespecified inclusion criteria and evaluated strength of evidence (SOE) using a framework designed to integrate a mixed-methods research.
Of 754 records identified, 33 studies (24 quantitative, 6 qualitative, and 3 mixed-methods) were included. Strength of evidence associated was low-to-moderate, with only 8 studies (24%) satisfying criteria for strong SOE. Geographies and provider cadres varied considerably. The most common specialties studied were pediatricians (n = 13), occupational therapists (n = 12), speech therapists (n = 11), physical therapists (n = 10), and child psychiatrists (n = 8). Topical areas included the following: provider availability by service area and care delivery model; qualitative assessments of provider availability and competency; role of insurance mandates in increasing access to providers: and disparities in access. Across provider categories, we found that workforce availability for autism-related services was limited in terms of overall numbers, time available, and knowledgeability. The greatest unmet need was observed among minorities and in rural settings. Most studies were short term, were limited in scope, and used convenience samples.
There is limited evidence to characterize the availability and distribution of the US workforce for autism-related child health care services. Existing evidence to date indicates significantly restricted availability.
在美国,多种卫生专业学科为自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)儿童提供服务。我们进行了一项系统综述,以研究美国自闭症相关儿童保健服务劳动力的可及性、分布情况和能力,并评估研究的证据强度。
我们在2008年至2018年期间检索了PubMed、PsychINFO、Embase和谷歌学术,以查找美国的相关研究。两名研究人员根据一组预先设定的纳入标准独立筛选和评估研究,并使用一个旨在整合混合方法研究的框架评估证据强度(SOE)。
在识别出的754条记录中,纳入了33项研究(24项定量研究、6项定性研究和3项混合方法研究)。相关证据强度为低到中等,只有8项研究(24%)符合强SOE标准。地理区域和提供者类别差异很大。研究最多的常见专业是儿科医生(n = 13)、职业治疗师(n = 12)、言语治疗师(n = 11)、物理治疗师(n = 10)和儿童精神科医生(n = 8)。主题领域包括:按服务区域和护理提供模式划分的提供者可及性;对提供者可及性和能力的定性评估;保险授权在增加获得提供者机会方面的作用;以及获得服务的差异。在所有提供者类别中,我们发现自闭症相关服务的劳动力可及性在总体数量、可用时间和知识水平方面都很有限。在少数族裔和农村地区观察到最大的未满足需求。大多数研究是短期的,范围有限,且使用的是便利样本。
关于美国自闭症相关儿童保健服务劳动力的可及性和分布情况方面的证据有限。迄今为止的现有证据表明可及性受到显著限制。