Reyna Valerie
Department of Human Development, Human Neuroscience Institute, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA.
J Intell. 2018 Jun 8;6(2):29. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence6020029.
I take a decision-making approach to consider ways of addressing the "unresolved and dramatic problems in the world". Traditional approaches to good decision-making are reviewed. These approaches reduce complex decisions to tradeoffs between magnitudes of probabilities, and outcomes in which the quantity and precision of information are key to making good decisions. I discuss a contrasting framework, called "fuzzy-trace theory", which emphasizes understanding the simple gist of options and applying core social and moral values. Importantly, the tendency to rely on meaningful but simple gist increases from childhood to adulthood (or, in adulthood, as people gain experience in a domain), so that specific irrational biases grow with knowledge and experience. As predicted theoretically, these violations of rationality in the traditional sense are associated empirically with healthier and more adaptive outcomes. Thus, interventions that help decision makers understand the essential gist of their options and how it connects to core values are practical approaches to reducing "unresolved and dramatic problems in the world" one decision at a time.
我采用决策方法来思考解决“世界上未解决的重大问题”的方式。回顾了传统的良好决策方法。这些方法将复杂的决策简化为概率大小与结果之间的权衡,其中信息的数量和精确性是做出良好决策的关键。我讨论了一个与之形成对比的框架,称为“模糊痕迹理论”,该理论强调理解选项的简单要点并应用核心社会和道德价值观。重要的是,从童年到成年(或者在成年后,随着人们在某个领域积累经验),依赖有意义但简单要点的倾向会增加,因此特定的非理性偏差会随着知识和经验的增长而增加。正如理论预测的那样,这些传统意义上对理性的违背在经验上与更健康、更具适应性的结果相关联。因此,帮助决策者理解其选项的基本要点以及它如何与核心价值观相联系的干预措施,是一次解决一个决策从而减少“世界上未解决的重大问题”的实用方法。