Theilen U, Wilsberg F J, Böhm R, Strauch D
Fachgebiet Tierhygiene im Institut für Tiermedizin und Tierhygiene der Universität Hohenheim.
Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg B Umwelthyg Krankenhaushyg Arbeitshyg Prav Med. 1987 Jun;184(3-4):229-52.
The present investigations are divided into two parts. First it is tested which commercial disinfectants are efficient in aerosol disinfection of bacterial spores. This part is carried out in an aerosol chamber with airborne spores (laboratory experiments). The best results are obtained with peracetic acid, hydrogen peroxide and formaldehyde are effective with some restrictions. With these disinfectants it is tested in the second part if the aerosol disinfecting-method is capable for disinfecting rooms with electronic equipment. This part is carried out in a vessel under open air conditions (field experiments). Bacterial spores dried on germ carriers of limewood, aluminium and rusty iron are exposed to disinfectant aerosols under those temperature and relative humidity conditions which are representative for the four seasons in Germany. In these investigations there are also included germ carriers with spores, that have been lyophilized without any protective substances respectively with Bentonite, Mixtura desiccans and Silicagel + Serum as protective substances. To check the corrosive effect of disinfectant aerosols electronic pocket calculators and pocket transistor receivers have been exposed to the aerosols. The best results are obtained with formaldehyde at temperatures above 10 degrees C and relative humidities within 65% to 95%. At temperatures and relative humidity conditions outside of this optimal range the effectiveness of formaldehyde tends to zero. Hydrogen peroxide is capable for disinfecting spores on germ carriers of limewood and aluminium at all temperature and relative humidity conditions; on germ carriers of rusty iron the effectiveness is reduced strongly. Same results could be obtained with peracetic acid respectively a mixture of peracetic acid and hydrogen peroxide. With these disinfectants a decontamination of rusty iron surfaces is impossible too except the germ concentration on the surface is below 10(4) CFU/cm2. As to the protective substances used in the lyophilization process Bentonite and Mixtura desiccans cause hardly any change in the disinfectant resistance of bacterial spores. Silicagel + Serum in comparison to that protects the imbedded spores that far, that no disinfection of these germ carriers was achieved with the oxidizing agents. As about 15 disinfection runs with each disinfectant did not cause permanent damages to the pocket calculators and transistor receivers it can be emphasized as result of these investigations that aerosol disinfection is an effective method in disinfecting rooms with electronic equipment under middle European climate conditions.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
目前的研究分为两个部分。首先,测试哪些商用消毒剂对细菌芽孢的气溶胶消毒有效。这部分在带有空气传播芽孢的气溶胶室中进行(实验室实验)。过氧乙酸、过氧化氢和甲醛取得了最佳效果,甲醛在某些方面有一定限制。在第二部分中,使用这些消毒剂测试气溶胶消毒方法是否能够对有电子设备的房间进行消毒。这部分在露天条件下的容器中进行(现场实验)。将干燥在椴木、铝和生锈铁等菌载体上的细菌芽孢,在代表德国四季的温度和相对湿度条件下暴露于消毒剂气溶胶中。在这些研究中,还包括分别用膨润土、干燥剂混合物和硅胶 + 血清作为保护物质冻干的带芽孢菌载体,其中一些冻干时未添加任何保护物质。为检查消毒剂气溶胶的腐蚀性,将电子袖珍计算器和袖珍晶体管收音机暴露于气溶胶中。在温度高于10摄氏度且相对湿度在65%至95%范围内时,甲醛取得了最佳效果。在该最佳范围之外的温度和相对湿度条件下,甲醛的有效性趋于零。过氧化氢在所有温度和相对湿度条件下都能够对椴木和铝菌载体上的芽孢进行消毒;在生锈铁菌载体上,其有效性大幅降低。过氧乙酸或过氧乙酸与过氧化氢的混合物也得到了相同结果。使用这些消毒剂,除非生锈铁表面的菌浓度低于10⁴CFU/cm²,否则无法对其表面进行去污处理。至于冻干过程中使用的保护物质,膨润土和干燥剂混合物对细菌芽孢的抗消毒能力几乎没有任何影响。相比之下,硅胶 + 血清对包埋的芽孢保护得很好,以至于使用氧化剂无法对这些菌载体进行消毒。由于每种消毒剂进行约15次消毒操作都未对袖珍计算器和晶体管收音机造成永久性损坏,这些研究结果可以强调,在中欧气候条件下,气溶胶消毒是对有电子设备的房间进行消毒的有效方法。(摘要截断于400字)