Suppr超能文献

观察虚拟现实模拟中旁观者干预的各个阶段。

Observing the stages of bystander intervention in virtual reality simulation.

作者信息

Buckler David G, Almodovar Alfredo, Snobelen Paul, Abella Benjamin S, Blewer Audrey, Leary Marion

机构信息

Center for Resuscitation Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

Peel Regional Paramedic Service, 1600 Bovaird Dr. E, Brampton ON, L6R 3S8, Canada.

出版信息

World J Emerg Med. 2019;10(3):145-151. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2019.03.003.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Understanding bystander reactions to an emergency is an important component of effective training. Four stages of bystander intervention (BI) have been previously described: noticing the situation as a problem, interpreting when it is appropriate to intervene, recognizing personal responsibility to intervene, and knowing how to intervene. Using virtual reality (VR) to simulate emergencies such as sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) can be used to study these stages.

METHODS

In a secondary analysis of an observational cohort study, we analyzed bystander self-efficacy for stages of BI before and after simulated SCA. Each subject participated in a single-player, immersive, VR SCA scenario. Subjects interacted with simulated bystanders through voice commands ("call 911", "get an AED"). Actions taken in scenario, like performing CPR, were documented. Scenario BI actions were compared based on dichotomized comfort/discomfort.

RESULTS

From June 2016 to June 2017, 119 subjects participated. Average age was 37±14 years, 44% were female and 46% reported CPR training within 2 years. During the scenario, 98% "noticed the event" and "interpreted it as a problem", 78% "took responsibility", and 54% "possessed the necessary skills". Self-efficacy increased from pre- to post-scenario: noticing the event increased from 80% to 96%; interpreting as a problem increased from 86% to 97%; taking responsibility increased from 56% to 93%; possessing necessary skills increased from 47% to 63% (<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Self-efficacy to respond to an SCA event increased pre- to post-scenario. Bystanders who reported feeling comfortable "taking responsibility to intervene" during an emergency were more likely to take action during a simulated emergency.

摘要

背景

了解旁观者对紧急情况的反应是有效培训的重要组成部分。先前已描述了旁观者干预(BI)的四个阶段:将情况视为问题加以注意、判断何时适合干预、认识到个人干预的责任以及知道如何干预。使用虚拟现实(VR)模拟诸如心脏骤停(SCA)等紧急情况可用于研究这些阶段。

方法

在一项观察性队列研究的二次分析中,我们分析了模拟SCA前后旁观者在BI各阶段的自我效能感。每个受试者参与了一个单人沉浸式VR SCA场景。受试者通过语音指令(“拨打911”,“拿一台自动体外除颤器”)与模拟旁观者互动。记录在场景中采取的行动,如进行心肺复苏。根据二分法的舒适/不舒适对场景中的BI行动进行比较。

结果

2016年6月至2017年6月,119名受试者参与。平均年龄为37±14岁,44%为女性,46%报告在2年内接受过心肺复苏培训。在场景中,98%的人“注意到事件”并“将其视为问题”,78%的人“承担责任”,54%的人“具备必要技能”。自我效能感从场景前到场景后有所提高:注意到事件从80%提高到96%;视为问题从86%提高到97%;承担责任从56%提高到93%;具备必要技能从47%提高到63%(<0.001)。

结论

应对SCA事件的自我效能感在场景前后有所提高。报告在紧急情况下对“承担干预责任”感到舒适的旁观者在模拟紧急情况下更有可能采取行动。

相似文献

1
Observing the stages of bystander intervention in virtual reality simulation.
World J Emerg Med. 2019;10(3):145-151. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2019.03.003.
4
Public CPR and AED Knowledge: An Opportunity for Educational Outreach in South Carolina.
South Med J. 2018 Jun;111(6):349-352. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000818.
6
Use of automated external defibrillators in cardiac arrest: an evidence-based analysis.
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2005;5(19):1-29. Epub 2005 Dec 1.
7
Drone delivery of an automated external defibrillator - a mixed method simulation study of bystander experience.
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2019 Apr 8;27(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s13049-019-0622-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Extended reality technologies in adult basic life support education: A scoping review.
Resusc Plus. 2025 Mar 14;23:100927. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2025.100927. eCollection 2025 May.
2
First aid self-efficacy: a scale adaptation and psychometric properties.
BMC Public Health. 2025 Apr 1;25(1):1234. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22486-w.
3
Intention to Act: Predicting Bystander Intervention in Violent Situations in South Korea.
J Interpers Violence. 2025 Jan;40(1-2):252-278. doi: 10.1177/08862605241246797. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
4
Effects of different cardiopulmonary resuscitation education interventions among university students: A randomized controlled trial.
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 14;18(3):e0283099. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283099. eCollection 2023.
5
Efficacy of Virtual Reality Simulation in Teaching Basic Life Support and Its Retention at 6 Months.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 24;20(5):4095. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054095.
6
A Pilot Study of CPR Quality Comparing an Augmented Reality Application vs. a Standard Audio-Visual Feedback Manikin.
Front Digit Health. 2020 Feb 28;2:1. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2020.00001. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

2
4
"Please. Don't. Die.": A Grounded Theory Study of Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018 Feb;11(2):e004035. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.004035.
5
RCT Testing Bystander Effectiveness to Reduce Violence.
Am J Prev Med. 2017 May;52(5):566-578. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.01.020. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
6
Comparison of Online and Traditional Basic Life Support Renewal Training Methods for Registered Professional Nurses.
J Nurses Prof Dev. 2015 Nov-Dec;31(6):E1-10. doi: 10.1097/NND.0000000000000201.
8
An Online Bystander Intervention Program for the Prevention of Sexual Violence.
Psychol Violence. 2015 Jul;5(3):227-235. doi: 10.1037/a0037393.
9
Impact of levels of simulation fidelity on training of interns in ACLS.
Hosp Pract (1995). 2014 Oct;42(4):135-41. doi: 10.3810/hp.2014.10.1150.
10
High-fidelity simulation for advanced cardiac life support training.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2013 Apr 12;77(3):59. doi: 10.5688/ajpe77359.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验